ORLANDO, Fla. -- Forensic tests made public Wednesday show that George
Zimmerman's was the only DNA that could be identified on the grip of
the gun used to fatally shoot 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.

The results rule out Martin's DNA from being on the gun's grip.
Zimmerman's DNA also was identified on the gun's holster, but no
determination could be made as to whether Martin's DNA was on the
gun's holster, according to the report from the Florida Department of
Law Enforcement.


Looks like no "struggle for the gun" argument to be made.

In article ,
says...

ORLANDO, Fla. -- Forensic tests made public Wednesday show that George
Zimmerman's was the only DNA that could be identified on the grip of
the gun used to fatally shoot 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.

The results rule out Martin's DNA from being on the gun's grip.
Zimmerman's DNA also was identified on the gun's holster, but no
determination could be made as to whether Martin's DNA was on the
gun's holster, according to the report from the Florida Department of
Law Enforcement.


Looks like no "struggle for the gun" argument to be made.

You've been watching too many TV shows.

On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 19:41:06 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

ORLANDO, Fla. -- Forensic tests made public Wednesday show that George
Zimmerman's was the only DNA that could be identified on the grip of
the gun used to fatally shoot 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.

The results rule out Martin's DNA from being on the gun's grip.
Zimmerman's DNA also was identified on the gun's holster, but no
determination could be made as to whether Martin's DNA was on the
gun's holster, according to the report from the Florida Department of
Law Enforcement.


Looks like no "struggle for the gun" argument to be made.

You've been watching too many TV shows.

===

Yes, and furthermore no struggle for the gun is necessary for
Zimmerman to have felt "threatened" although it would certainly help
his defense.

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:31:53 -0700, jps wrote:


ORLANDO, Fla. -- Forensic tests made public Wednesday show that George
Zimmerman's was the only DNA that could be identified on the grip of
the gun used to fatally shoot 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.

The results rule out Martin's DNA from being on the gun's grip.
Zimmerman's DNA also was identified on the gun's holster, but no
determination could be made as to whether Martin's DNA was on the
gun's holster, according to the report from the Florida Department of
Law Enforcement.


Looks like no "struggle for the gun" argument to be made.

If Zimmerman was even slightly trained in gun retention, there could
be a hell of a struggle and Martin would still have never touched the
gun.

Did you hear, Omara got Lester tossed. The immunity hearing will be in
front of another judge.

Intersting!

On Sep 19, 7:41*pm, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...



ORLANDO, Fla. -- Forensic tests made public Wednesday show that George
Zimmerman's was the only DNA that could be identified on the grip of
the gun used to fatally shoot 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.

The results rule out Martin's DNA from being on the gun's grip.
Zimmerman's DNA also was identified on the gun's holster, but no
determination could be made as to whether Martin's DNA was on the
gun's holster, according to the report from the Florida Department of
Law Enforcement.

Looks like no "struggle for the gun" argument to be made.

You've been watching too many TV shows.

" It " wants to be on CSI Miami....as a floor sweeper.

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:31:53 -0700, jps wrote:


ORLANDO, Fla. -- Forensic tests made public Wednesday show that George
Zimmerman's was the only DNA that could be identified on the grip of
the gun used to fatally shoot 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.

The results rule out Martin's DNA from being on the gun's grip.
Zimmerman's DNA also was identified on the gun's holster, but no
determination could be made as to whether Martin's DNA was on the
gun's holster, according to the report from the Florida Department of
Law Enforcement.


Looks like no "struggle for the gun" argument to be made.

There was an article in the paper about this today.
It turns out that not only was there no Martin DNA on the gun, there
was also NO Zimmerman DNA on the gun. (the only identifiable DNA was
on the holster)


Maybe Zimmerman didn't do it ;-)

We know that Zimmerman kept his weapon clean.

On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:14:53 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:31:53 -0700, jps wrote:


ORLANDO, Fla. -- Forensic tests made public Wednesday show that George
Zimmerman's was the only DNA that could be identified on the grip of
the gun used to fatally shoot 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.

The results rule out Martin's DNA from being on the gun's grip.
Zimmerman's DNA also was identified on the gun's holster, but no
determination could be made as to whether Martin's DNA was on the
gun's holster, according to the report from the Florida Department of
Law Enforcement.


Looks like no "struggle for the gun" argument to be made.

There was an article in the paper about this today.
It turns out that not only was there no Martin DNA on the gun, there
was also NO Zimmerman DNA on the gun. (the only identifiable DNA was
on the holster)


Maybe Zimmerman didn't do it ;-)

We know that Zimmerman kept his weapon clean.

Clean weapons are happy weapons!

On 9/21/2012 12:49 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:04:49 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

Whether or not Zimmerman is guilty of a crime is something the courts
will have to decide. It has become pretty clear however that he is
not exactly a model citizen or a paragon of good judgement. In
addition to that he has cast a lot of unwanted attention onto the
stand your ground law.

It also increased the number of people who simply do not want to be
involved.
Why would you want to take the chance of paying too much attention to
a thug who can beat you senseless and you can't defend yourself. It is
better to just look the other way.


Well, when you get down to it, that's what folks like Sharpton and
Jackson, Enfume want. They want to take the pressure off of the
criminals to keep the cycle that feeds them, going...

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:04:49 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

Whether or not Zimmerman is guilty of a crime is something the courts
will have to decide. It has become pretty clear however that he is
not exactly a model citizen or a paragon of good judgement. In
addition to that he has cast a lot of unwanted attention onto the
stand your ground law.

It also increased the number of people who simply do not want to be
involved.
Why would you want to take the chance of paying too much attention to
a thug who can beat you senseless and you can't defend yourself. It is
better to just look the other way.

And that's what Martin tried to do!

In article , says...

On 9/21/2012 12:49 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:04:49 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

Whether or not Zimmerman is guilty of a crime is something the courts
will have to decide. It has become pretty clear however that he is
not exactly a model citizen or a paragon of good judgement. In
addition to that he has cast a lot of unwanted attention onto the
stand your ground law.

It also increased the number of people who simply do not want to be
involved.
Why would you want to take the chance of paying too much attention to
a thug who can beat you senseless and you can't defend yourself. It is
better to just look the other way.


Well, when you get down to it, that's what folks like Sharpton and
Jackson, Enfume want. They want to take the pressure off of the
criminals to keep the cycle that feeds them, going...

Damn you are insane.