Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default For the 4G dummies!!

In article ,
says...

On Sunday, September 23, 2012 10:34:26 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

It's the multipath that will get you service without line of sight.


Multipath in the RF world is, by definition, a bad thing. It is not desirable, as it can destroy your signal.

"As seen below, the spread spectrum radio technology used in 3G systems, is abandoned in all 4G candidate systems and replaced by OFDMA multi-carrier transmission and other frequency-domain equalization (FDE) schemes, making it possible to transfer very high bit rates *despite extensive multi-path radio propagation (echoes)*. The peak bit rate is further improved by smart antenna arrays for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communications."

"despite extensive multi-path radio propagation" They take measures to insure multipath doesn't screw up 4G.

Every time you try to post about something technical, you get bitch-slapped. You should stick to something you know, like... umm. Nevermind.


Bull****. Here, moron:

"The results of outdoor experiments and computer simulations confirm
that no serious multipath degradation occurs in a service area with a
radius of a few hundred- meters and that the application of multi-hop
transmission technology can drastically improve the frame success rate,
which effectively avoids the degraded radio link by multipath."
  #22   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,107
Default For the 4G dummies!!

On 9/23/2012 11:19 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Sunday, September 23, 2012 10:34:26 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

It's the multipath that will get you service without line of sight.


Multipath in the RF world is, by definition, a bad thing. It is not desirable, as it can destroy your signal.

"As seen below, the spread spectrum radio technology used in 3G systems, is abandoned in all 4G candidate systems and replaced by OFDMA multi-carrier transmission and other frequency-domain equalization (FDE) schemes, making it possible to transfer very high bit rates *despite extensive multi-path radio propagation (echoes)*. The peak bit rate is further improved by smart antenna arrays for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communications."

"despite extensive multi-path radio propagation" They take measures to insure multipath doesn't screw up 4G.

Every time you try to post about something technical, you get bitch-slapped. You should stick to something you know, like... umm. Nevermind.


Bull****. Here, moron:

"The results of outdoor experiments and computer simulations confirm
that no serious multipath degradation occurs in a service area with a
radius of a few hundred- meters and that the application of multi-hop
transmission technology can drastically improve the frame success rate,
which effectively avoids the degraded radio link by multipath."

If you quote a source you need to attribute, dummy.
  #23   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,027
Default For the 4G dummies!!

On Sunday, September 23, 2012 11:19:38 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Sunday, September 23, 2012 10:34:26 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:




It's the multipath that will get you service without line of sight.




Multipath in the RF world is, by definition, a bad thing. It is not desirable, as it can destroy your signal.




"As seen below, the spread spectrum radio technology used in 3G systems, is abandoned in all 4G candidate systems and replaced by OFDMA multi-carrier transmission and other frequency-domain equalization (FDE) schemes, making it possible to transfer very high bit rates *despite extensive multi-path radio propagation (echoes)*. The peak bit rate is further improved by smart antenna arrays for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communications.."




"despite extensive multi-path radio propagation" They take measures to insure multipath doesn't screw up 4G.




Every time you try to post about something technical, you get bitch-slapped. You should stick to something you know, like... umm. Nevermind.




Bull****. Here, moron:



"The results of outdoor experiments and computer simulations confirm
that no serious multipath degradation occurs in a service area with a
radius of a few hundred- meters and that the application of multi-hop
transmission technology can drastically improve the frame success rate,
which effectively avoids the degraded radio link by multipath."


So their experiments and simulation show that the measures they took ("multi-hop transmission technology") were effective in avoiding "degraded radio link by multipath".

Thanks for proving my point!
  #24   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,333
Default For the 4G dummies!!

On 9/23/2012 11:36 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 11:19:36 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sunday, September 23, 2012 10:34:26 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

It's the multipath that will get you service without line of sight.

Multipath in the RF world is, by definition, a bad thing. It is not desirable, as it can destroy your signal.

"As seen below, the spread spectrum radio technology used in 3G systems, is abandoned in all 4G candidate systems and replaced by OFDMA multi-carrier transmission and other frequency-domain equalization (FDE) schemes, making it possible to transfer very high bit rates *despite extensive multi-path radio propagation (echoes)*. The peak bit rate is further improved by smart antenna arrays for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communications."

"despite extensive multi-path radio propagation" They take measures to insure multipath doesn't screw up 4G.

Every time you try to post about something technical, you get bitch-slapped. You should stick to something you know, like... umm. Nevermind.


Bull****. Here, moron:

"The results of outdoor experiments and computer simulations confirm
that no serious multipath degradation occurs in a service area with a
radius of a few hundred- meters and that the application of multi-hop
transmission technology can drastically improve the frame success rate,
which effectively avoids the degraded radio link by multipath."



In the mountains, you need LOS. Walking 50 feet can be the difference
between no bars and a full house.


He is a narrow flatlander... He doesn't understand that the whole
country is not like his area..
  #25   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default For the 4G dummies!!

In article ,
says...

On Sunday, September 23, 2012 11:19:38 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Sunday, September 23, 2012 10:34:26 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:




It's the multipath that will get you service without line of sight.




Multipath in the RF world is, by definition, a bad thing. It is not desirable, as it can destroy your signal.




"As seen below, the spread spectrum radio technology used in 3G systems, is abandoned in all 4G candidate systems and replaced by OFDMA multi-carrier transmission and other frequency-domain equalization (FDE) schemes, making it possible to transfer very high bit rates *despite extensive multi-path radio propagation (echoes)*. The peak bit rate is further improved by smart antenna arrays for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communications."




"despite extensive multi-path radio propagation" They take measures to insure multipath doesn't screw up 4G.




Every time you try to post about something technical, you get bitch-slapped. You should stick to something you know, like... umm. Nevermind.




Bull****. Here, moron:



"The results of outdoor experiments and computer simulations confirm
that no serious multipath degradation occurs in a service area with a
radius of a few hundred- meters and that the application of multi-hop
transmission technology can drastically improve the frame success rate,
which effectively avoids the degraded radio link by multipath."


So their experiments and simulation show that the measures they took ("multi-hop transmission technology") were effective in avoiding "degraded radio link by multipath".

Thanks for proving my point!


If that's what you think you are a fool.


  #26   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default For the 4G dummies!!

In article , says...

On 9/23/2012 11:36 AM,
wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 11:19:36 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sunday, September 23, 2012 10:34:26 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

It's the multipath that will get you service without line of sight.

Multipath in the RF world is, by definition, a bad thing. It is not desirable, as it can destroy your signal.

"As seen below, the spread spectrum radio technology used in 3G systems, is abandoned in all 4G candidate systems and replaced by OFDMA multi-carrier transmission and other frequency-domain equalization (FDE) schemes, making it possible to transfer very high bit rates *despite extensive multi-path radio propagation (echoes)*. The peak bit rate is further improved by smart antenna arrays for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communications."

"despite extensive multi-path radio propagation" They take measures to insure multipath doesn't screw up 4G.

Every time you try to post about something technical, you get bitch-slapped. You should stick to something you know, like... umm. Nevermind.

Bull****. Here, moron:

"The results of outdoor experiments and computer simulations confirm
that no serious multipath degradation occurs in a service area with a
radius of a few hundred- meters and that the application of multi-hop
transmission technology can drastically improve the frame success rate,
which effectively avoids the degraded radio link by multipath."



In the mountains, you need LOS. Walking 50 feet can be the difference
between no bars and a full house.


He is a narrow flatlander... He doesn't understand that the whole
country is not like his area..


What a moron.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stimulus package for dummies Cliff General 2 February 13th 09 02:32 PM
Stimulus package for dummies Cliff General 0 February 12th 09 11:32 AM
Stimulus package for dummies Cliff General 0 February 12th 09 11:30 AM
Stimulus package for dummies Frogwatch General 0 February 1st 09 04:45 PM
Uffda!! What a bunch of dummies JAXAshby ASA 1 March 11th 04 07:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017