Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Someone here the other day was asking about CZ pistols, and I commented that I thought they were pretty good and was interested in a .45ACP version of the CZ 75. Here's a pretty good video on the CZ 75: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb0DgMcpXWQ HEre's some stuff on the 97, which interests me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-thtHIeR448 From the comment under the video: This model was evaluated by the American magazine Soldier of Fortune in its '99 issue as the most accurate serially produced "Combat" pistol in ..45 ACP calibre. Here's another vid on the 97: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cOfpkbCr0U |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/15/2012 1:13 PM, EmpacherFan wrote:
Someone here the other day was asking about CZ pistols, and I commented that I thought they were pretty good and was interested in a .45ACP version of the CZ 75. Here's a pretty good video on the CZ 75: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb0DgMcpXWQ HEre's some stuff on the 97, which interests me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-thtHIeR448 From the comment under the video: This model was evaluated by the American magazine Soldier of Fortune in its '99 issue as the most accurate serially produced "Combat" pistol in ..45 ACP calibre. Here's another vid on the 97: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cOfpkbCr0U Is there any evidence that supports the notion that a CZ pistol is better than it's Sig equivilent? |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, October 15, 2012 1:13:47 PM UTC-4, EmpacherFan wrote:
Someone here the other day was asking about CZ pistols, and I commented that I thought they were pretty good and was interested in a .45ACP version of the CZ 75. Here's a pretty good video on the CZ 75: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb0DgMcpXWQ HEre's some stuff on the 97, which interests me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-thtHIeR448 From the comment under the video: This model was evaluated by the American magazine Soldier of Fortune in its '99 issue as the most accurate serially produced "Combat" pistol in .45 ACP calibre. Here's another vid on the 97: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cOfpkbCr0U I have a CZ82 in the 9x18 Makarov caliber. 12+1 capacity, inexpensive, reliable, accurate, and cheap ammo. Great for general purpose plinking. Oh, and easy to disassemble for cleaning. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 15, 1:13*pm, EmpacherFan wrote:
Someone here the other day was asking about CZ pistols, and I commented that I thought they were pretty good and was interested in a .45ACP version of the CZ 75. Here's a pretty good video on the CZ 75: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb0DgMcpXWQ HEre's some stuff on the 97, which interests me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-thtHIeR448 From the comment under the video: This model was evaluated by the American magazine Soldier of Fortune in its '99 issue as the most accurate serially produced "Combat" pistol in .45 ACP calibre. Here's another vid on the 97: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cOfpkbCr0U WHY....are you all responding to Harrys new sock-puppet? |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 15, 2:28*pm, EmpacherFan wrote:
In article om, says... On 10/15/2012 1:13 PM, EmpacherFan wrote: Someone here the other day was asking about CZ pistols, and I commented that I thought they were pretty good and was interested in a .45ACP version of the CZ 75. Here's a pretty good video on the CZ 75: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb0DgMcpXWQ HEre's some stuff on the 97, which interests me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-thtHIeR448 *From the comment under the video: This model was evaluated by the American magazine Soldier of Fortune in its '99 issue as the most accurate serially produced "Combat" pistol in ..45 ACP calibre. Here's another vid on the 97: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cOfpkbCr0U Is there any evidence that supports the notion that a CZ pistol is better than it's Sig equivilent? I'm not sure what you mean by better. SIG and CZ both make fine quality firearms. They have significant design differences. For one thing, I think the CZ slide/frame mating is tighter than the slide/frame mating on a SIG but I am not sure that impacts accuracy in any measurable way. SIG makes some fancier models, but I am not sure they shoot better than their plainer models or the corresponding CZ offerings. Maybe if you qualified your "better" question it would make the response easier. I will say I see a lot more CZs in competition than SIGs. I am going to buy a CZ 97B in .45 ACP soon and use it as my carry defense pistol if I can. I don't much like the .40 S&W round especially in a polymer pistol like my Glock.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sure, Harry.....keep dreaming. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... In article om, says... On 10/15/2012 1:13 PM, EmpacherFan wrote: Someone here the other day was asking about CZ pistols, and I commented that I thought they were pretty good and was interested in a .45ACP version of the CZ 75. Here's a pretty good video on the CZ 75: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb0DgMcpXWQ HEre's some stuff on the 97, which interests me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-thtHIeR448 From the comment under the video: This model was evaluated by the American magazine Soldier of Fortune in its '99 issue as the most accurate serially produced "Combat" pistol in ..45 ACP calibre. Here's another vid on the 97: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cOfpkbCr0U Is there any evidence that supports the notion that a CZ pistol is better than it's Sig equivilent? I'm not sure what you mean by better. SIG and CZ both make fine quality firearms. They have significant design differences. For one thing, I think the CZ slide/frame mating is tighter than the slide/frame mating on a SIG but I am not sure that impacts accuracy in any measurable way. SIG makes some fancier models, but I am not sure they shoot better than their plainer models or the corresponding CZ offerings. Maybe if you qualified your "better" question it would make the response easier. I will say I see a lot more CZs in competition than SIGs. I am going to buy a CZ 97B in .45 ACP soon and use it as my carry defense pistol if I can. I don't much like the .40 S&W round especially in a polymer pistol like my Glock. Why don't you like the .40S&W? Why would you drop it for a .45 ACP? |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 15, 7:23*pm, BAR wrote:
In article , says... In article om, says... On 10/15/2012 1:13 PM, EmpacherFan wrote: Someone here the other day was asking about CZ pistols, and I commented that I thought they were pretty good and was interested in a .45ACP version of the CZ 75. Here's a pretty good video on the CZ 75: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb0DgMcpXWQ HEre's some stuff on the 97, which interests me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-thtHIeR448 *From the comment under the video: This model was evaluated by the American magazine Soldier of Fortune in its '99 issue as the most accurate serially produced "Combat" pistol in ..45 ACP calibre. Here's another vid on the 97: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cOfpkbCr0U Is there any evidence that supports the notion that a CZ pistol is better than it's Sig equivilent? I'm not sure what you mean by better. SIG and CZ both make fine quality firearms. They have significant design differences. For one thing, I think the CZ slide/frame mating is tighter than the slide/frame mating on a SIG but I am not sure that impacts accuracy in any measurable way. SIG makes some fancier models, but I am not sure they shoot better than their plainer models or the corresponding CZ offerings. Maybe if you qualified your "better" question it would make the response easier. I will say I see a lot more CZs in competition than SIGs. I am going to buy a CZ 97B in .45 ACP soon and use it as my carry defense pistol if I can. I don't much like the .40 S&W round especially in a polymer pistol like my Glock. Why don't you like the .40S&W? Why would you drop it for a .45 ACP? My view is simple. I'm used to the .45 govt. "Old habits (like you)- are too hard to break..." |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 15, 12:54*pm, wrote:
On Monday, October 15, 2012 1:13:47 PM UTC-4, EmpacherFan wrote: Someone here the other day was asking about CZ pistols, and I commented that I thought they were pretty good and was interested in a .45ACP version of the CZ 75. Here's a pretty good video on the CZ 75: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb0DgMcpXWQ HEre's some stuff on the 97, which interests me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-thtHIeR448 From the comment under the video: This model was evaluated by the American magazine Soldier of Fortune in its '99 issue as the most accurate serially produced "Combat" pistol in .45 ACP calibre. Here's another vid on the 97: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cOfpkbCr0U I have a CZ82 in the 9x18 Makarov caliber. *12+1 capacity, inexpensive, reliable, accurate, and cheap ammo. *Great for general purpose plinking. *Oh, and easy to disassemble for cleaning. Speaking of 'cheap'- I just picked up 300 rd. of 9x18 Mak. for $20.00. An elderly friend of my parked his *cold war souvenir* Radum P-64 years ago, and was digging though an attic box and found the cartridges. Perfect for my Feg PA-63 Hungarian~ ?;^ ) |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 18:23:11 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: Why don't you like the .40S&W? Why would you drop it for a .45 ACP? My view is simple. I'm used to the .45 govt. "Old habits (like you)- are too hard to break..." === In an emergency the best gun is the one you know (and the one you have). |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Check out the pics and vids under News, gallery etc. | Tall Ship Photos | |||
Pistol shooting on the block | General | |||
Flare launcher pistol. 25mm. | Cruising |