In article ,
says...

On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 07:45:38 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 11/30/12 7:35 AM, Gogarty wrote:
In article ,
says...


On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:00:48 -0500, JustWait
wrote:

Hey, it's the way I read it. Only saw one write up though and I have
been clear with all of my posts that I am not yet clear but "if it
happened the way I read it". All of you need to read better...


I think is interesting that these good liberal folks have convicted
this guy without a word of testimony, a hearing or a trial, based on a
news story. I think that is what we call a lynch mob isn't it?

No. The news story, in the NY Times and elsewhere, is based on what the
police said, such as the man did not report to the police on the day of
the intrusion and murders because he did not want to disturb the cops'
holiday. Seems to me he has pretty much convicted himself unless the
papers are making it all up.



Fretwell thinks everyone has the right to shoot anyone he or she finds
offensive.

Harry I remember you talking about all the people you would shoot if
they were in your house.

The real issue here is due process. If this guy actually gets
convicted of all of the allegations, he should go to jail.

I suppose it really just depends on how good a lawyer he can afford.

Heck, it was worse than that, he said he'd shoot anyone who showed up at
his door unannounced!

"ESAD" wrote in message
m...

On 11/30/12 7:35 AM, Gogarty wrote:
In article ,
says...


On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:00:48 -0500, JustWait
wrote:

Hey, it's the way I read it. Only saw one write up though and I have
been clear with all of my posts that I am not yet clear but "if it
happened the way I read it". All of you need to read better...


I think is interesting that these good liberal folks have convicted
this guy without a word of testimony, a hearing or a trial, based on a
news story. I think that is what we call a lynch mob isn't it?

No. The news story, in the NY Times and elsewhere, is based on what the
police said, such as the man did not report to the police on the day of
the intrusion and murders because he did not want to disturb the cops'
holiday. Seems to me he has pretty much convicted himself unless the
papers are making it all up.



Fretwell thinks everyone has the right to shoot anyone he or she finds
offensive.


--------------------

No he doesn't and you know you exaggerated. He figures you can protect your
self against a home invasion. Which is what these two did. The guy went
overboard in the shooting department, but he still had a right to shoot
them. And some you may want to execute, so when they get out of jail, or
while awaiting trial his friends decide to make it impossible for you to
testify. Which is a big problem with gang affiliated bandits. Sort of like
the B movie it Charles Bronson. Forget the name. As to home invasion being
dangerous.
http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/...on-4080653.php
Very upscale region. so not inner city crime.

GuzzisRule wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:28:36 -0800, jps wrote:

Good example of irrational scum who think taking a life for the theft
of stuff is fair and balanced.

Wonder how he'll feel when we're furnishing him with three hots and a
cot for the rest of his miserable life.


A Minnesota homeowner who shot two teenagers in the midst of an
apparent Thanksgiving Day break-in told authorities he feared they had
a weapon, but acknowledged firing "more shots than I needed to" and
appeared to take pride in "a good clean finishing shot" for one teen,
according to investigators.

Byron David Smith, 64, was charged Monday with two counts of
second-degree murder in a criminal complaint that was chilling for the
clinical way investigators said he described the shootings.

And he *should* finish his life in prison. Once the threat was gone he should have stopped shooting,
as the cop said. As someone else said, a bigger gun would have kept him out of trouble.
Well said.

ESAD wrote:
On 11/28/12 7:57 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , thujas96825
@mypacks.net says...

On 11/27/12 6:52 PM, Tim wrote:
On Nov 27, 5:38 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 11/27/12 6:23 PM, Tim wrote:

On Nov 27, 8:50 am, Gogarty wrote:

The man is a cold-blooded murderer. Like all gun nuts he has
just been sitting there waiting all these years to kill
somebody. ...

Hmmm, I didn't know that about myself.

I'm a gun nut and I don't have plans on killing anybody. Never did.

However I DID bag a 4 point buck early this morning. a 12 ga. slug
right through the lungs at approx 60 yards. That's not a record shot
but it worked. It's [the deer] already at the processors and the
venison will be donated to the local food pantry.

Impressed by your bravery in shooting one of those dangerous bambis!

In cane you missed it, the deer will be processed and donated to the
local food pantry (to help feed those in need)

Remember that next time you eat Porky the Pig, or Elsie, and Elmer the
cow.


I don't usually go out and shoot a steak.

You usually don't pay your taxes or your debts either.


How interesting.


Losing track of your personalities, Krause? Be more careful next time..

ESAD wrote:
On 11/30/12 7:35 AM, Gogarty wrote:
In article ,
says...


On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:00:48 -0500, JustWait
wrote:

Hey, it's the way I read it. Only saw one write up though and I have
been clear with all of my posts that I am not yet clear but "if it
happened the way I read it". All of you need to read better...


I think is interesting that these good liberal folks have convicted
this guy without a word of testimony, a hearing or a trial, based on a
news story. I think that is what we call a lynch mob isn't it?

No. The news story, in the NY Times and elsewhere, is based on what the
police said, such as the man did not report to the police on the day of
the intrusion and murders because he did not want to disturb the cops'
holiday. Seems to me he has pretty much convicted himself unless the
papers are making it all up.



Fretwell thinks everyone has the right to shoot anyone he or she finds
offensive.
Krause thinks taxes are optional.

In article , earl18134
@hotmail.com says...

ESAD wrote:
On 11/30/12 7:35 AM, Gogarty wrote:
In article ,
says...


On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:00:48 -0500, JustWait
wrote:

Hey, it's the way I read it. Only saw one write up though and I have
been clear with all of my posts that I am not yet clear but "if it
happened the way I read it". All of you need to read better...


I think is interesting that these good liberal folks have convicted
this guy without a word of testimony, a hearing or a trial, based on a
news story. I think that is what we call a lynch mob isn't it?

No. The news story, in the NY Times and elsewhere, is based on what the
police said, such as the man did not report to the police on the day of
the intrusion and murders because he did not want to disturb the cops'
holiday. Seems to me he has pretty much convicted himself unless the
papers are making it all up.



Fretwell thinks everyone has the right to shoot anyone he or she finds
offensive.
Krause thinks taxes are optional.

Optional for him and mandatory for others.

This guy might do some time. And that's a very slim 'might' knowing
who he is and where he's from.

Er... Forget something, Senator?

http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/poli...bag/singleton/

In article 48c909b9-ff5d-4e84-8d52-21fd22405cd5
@v9g2000yql.googlegroups.com, says...

This guy might do some time. And that's a very slim 'might' knowing
who he is and where he's from.

Er... Forget something, Senator?

http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/poli...bag/singleton/

Oops!

So I thought I'd do a bit of a follow up on this incident, and sure enough. Not much happened. Not much at all...

State Sen. Donne Trotter, D-Chicago got court supervision...

http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2013/04/...-gun-to-ohare/