On 2/28/13 2:25 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:39:47 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:14:31 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:36:55 PM UTC-5, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:32:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:



Oh, and

he has worked very hard to divert the disaster



====



It was his idea.



http://www.amazon.com/The-Price-Politics-Bob-Woodward/dp/1451651104

Yup

Moron.

http://tinyurl.com/bm3llve

====

Let me see if I understand this. You and some low profile blog site
are challenging the journalistic integrity of Bob Woodward and the
Washington Post?



When he runs to Hannity the Manity, yes.



Really. If you heading to Hannity to whine, as Woodward reportedly is
going to do, you've already lost.

In article ,
says...


Now, I've heard the stories that maybe he and others never thought it
would go this far, but that makes no difference to me. *If* this
arm-twisting sequester concept originated in his administration ....
and *if* he approved of it, he's gambling with American interests
and the economy. No president, Senator or Congressman/woman has the
right to gamble with national interests in a show of brinkmanship.
The should all be impeached or fired.

That's my story and I am sticking to it. Notice that I am not
picking sides. They are *all* at fault.

Why pay attention to "stories?" That's just spin, from either side.
Here's the facts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_Control_Act_of_2011
It's easy to read.
Note when the legislation was agreed to.
"as the midnight August 2, 2011, deadline for an unprecedented U.S.
sovereign default drew nearer and nearer."

You already forgot the Republican House was about to default on American
debt, and make every one of us a deadbeat?
The same Republican House had already done enough damage that U.S.
credit was downgraded.
Sequestration was the only way to get the Republican house to vote for
the debt ceiling increase, and that prevented U.S. default.
This country's citizens will never agree with the Republican party's
desired method to solve the debt problem. But the Republican party will
persist until they are destroyed.
Why? Because the Republican party is full of uncompromising dumb-asses.
Just get ready for more "bloodshed."
This is only the beginning. Besides budgetary matters, the Republican
party is soon to prove itself uncompromising on immigration reform and
gun safety, preventing any advance in those areas.
Why? Because the Republican party is full of uncompromising dumb-asses.
Just watch. Let the chips fall where they may.

On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:37:06 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/28/13 2:25 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:39:47 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:14:31 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:36:55 PM UTC-5, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:32:33 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:



Oh, and

he has worked very hard to divert the disaster



====



It was his idea.



http://www.amazon.com/The-Price-Politics-Bob-Woodward/dp/1451651104

Yup

Moron.

http://tinyurl.com/bm3llve

====

Let me see if I understand this. You and some low profile blog site
are challenging the journalistic integrity of Bob Woodward and the
Washington Post?



When he runs to Hannity the Manity, yes.



Really. If you heading to Hannity to whine, as Woodward reportedly is
going to do, you've already lost.

I don't dismiss him entirely, but it sure is suspect.

On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:38:20 -0600, Boating All Out wrote:

In article ,
says...


Now, I've heard the stories that maybe he and others never thought it
would go this far, but that makes no difference to me. *If* this
arm-twisting sequester concept originated in his administration ....
and *if* he approved of it, he's gambling with American interests
and the economy. No president, Senator or Congressman/woman has the
right to gamble with national interests in a show of brinkmanship.
The should all be impeached or fired.

That's my story and I am sticking to it. Notice that I am not
picking sides. They are *all* at fault.

Why pay attention to "stories?" That's just spin, from either side.
Here's the facts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_Control_Act_of_2011
It's easy to read.
Note when the legislation was agreed to.
"as the midnight August 2, 2011, deadline for an unprecedented U.S.
sovereign default drew nearer and nearer."

You already forgot the Republican House was about to default on American
debt, and make every one of us a deadbeat?
The same Republican House had already done enough damage that U.S.
credit was downgraded.
Sequestration was the only way to get the Republican house to vote for
the debt ceiling increase, and that prevented U.S. default.
This country's citizens will never agree with the Republican party's
desired method to solve the debt problem. But the Republican party will
persist until they are destroyed.
Why? Because the Republican party is full of uncompromising dumb-asses.
Just get ready for more "bloodshed."
This is only the beginning. Besides budgetary matters, the Republican
party is soon to prove itself uncompromising on immigration reform and
gun safety, preventing any advance in those areas.
Why? Because the Republican party is full of uncompromising dumb-asses.
Just watch. Let the chips fall where they may.



Horse****.

Why not just say, "It's Bush's fault."
--
Salmonbait

All decisions are the result of binary thinking.

On 2/28/13 4:40 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:38:20 -0600, Boating All Out wrote:

In article ,
says...


Now, I've heard the stories that maybe he and others never thought it
would go this far, but that makes no difference to me. *If* this
arm-twisting sequester concept originated in his administration ....
and *if* he approved of it, he's gambling with American interests
and the economy. No president, Senator or Congressman/woman has the
right to gamble with national interests in a show of brinkmanship.
The should all be impeached or fired.

That's my story and I am sticking to it. Notice that I am not
picking sides. They are *all* at fault.

Why pay attention to "stories?" That's just spin, from either side.
Here's the facts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_Control_Act_of_2011
It's easy to read.
Note when the legislation was agreed to.
"as the midnight August 2, 2011, deadline for an unprecedented U.S.
sovereign default drew nearer and nearer."

You already forgot the Republican House was about to default on American
debt, and make every one of us a deadbeat?
The same Republican House had already done enough damage that U.S.
credit was downgraded.
Sequestration was the only way to get the Republican house to vote for
the debt ceiling increase, and that prevented U.S. default.
This country's citizens will never agree with the Republican party's
desired method to solve the debt problem. But the Republican party will
persist until they are destroyed.
Why? Because the Republican party is full of uncompromising dumb-asses.
Just get ready for more "bloodshed."
This is only the beginning. Besides budgetary matters, the Republican
party is soon to prove itself uncompromising on immigration reform and
gun safety, preventing any advance in those areas.
Why? Because the Republican party is full of uncompromising dumb-asses.
Just watch. Let the chips fall where they may.



Horse****.

Why not just say, "It's Bush's fault."



Ahh, J Herring an uncompromising Republican dumbass.

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:38:20 -0600, Boating All Out wrote:

In article ,
says...


Now, I've heard the stories that maybe he and others never thought it
would go this far, but that makes no difference to me. *If* this
arm-twisting sequester concept originated in his administration ....
and *if* he approved of it, he's gambling with American interests
and the economy. No president, Senator or Congressman/woman has the
right to gamble with national interests in a show of brinkmanship.
The should all be impeached or fired.

That's my story and I am sticking to it. Notice that I am not
picking sides. They are *all* at fault.

Why pay attention to "stories?" That's just spin, from either side.
Here's the facts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_Control_Act_of_2011
It's easy to read.
Note when the legislation was agreed to.
"as the midnight August 2, 2011, deadline for an unprecedented U.S.
sovereign default drew nearer and nearer."

You already forgot the Republican House was about to default on American
debt, and make every one of us a deadbeat?
The same Republican House had already done enough damage that U.S.
credit was downgraded.
Sequestration was the only way to get the Republican house to vote for
the debt ceiling increase, and that prevented U.S. default.
This country's citizens will never agree with the Republican party's
desired method to solve the debt problem. But the Republican party will
persist until they are destroyed.
Why? Because the Republican party is full of uncompromising dumb-asses.
Just get ready for more "bloodshed."
This is only the beginning. Besides budgetary matters, the Republican
party is soon to prove itself uncompromising on immigration reform and
gun safety, preventing any advance in those areas.
Why? Because the Republican party is full of uncompromising dumb-asses.
Just watch. Let the chips fall where they may.



Horse****.

Why not just say, "It's Bush's fault."

What part of this is bull****? Please give cite as to why.