On 3/15/2013 11:25 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:55:57 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

No woman should be forced to bring an unwanted child into the world
just to comply with someone else's religious beliefs.


Kinda' like Row vs Wade forcing me to pay for someone else s abortions?

The $500 abortion is a lot cheaper than 18 years of welfare and a life
time of prison costs.


And more specifically which women in the US don't have access simply
because there is an so far unsuccessful lobby group out there?

On 3/15/13 11:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/15/2013 11:25 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:55:57 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

No woman should be forced to bring an unwanted child into the world
just to comply with someone else's religious beliefs.


Kinda' like Row vs Wade forcing me to pay for someone else s abortions?

The $500 abortion is a lot cheaper than 18 years of welfare and a life
time of prison costs.


And more specifically which women in the US don't have access simply
because there is an so far unsuccessful lobby group out there?


As just one example, there is a single abortion provider in the state of
Mississippi, and next month the state will hold a license hearing on the
facility in an attempt to shut it down.

I think Kansas and several other backwards states are moving in similar
directions, and I know there are attempts in Virginia to shut down clinics.

So, there is an answer to your question. Women of Mississippi may soon
lose the one clinic in their state that provides abortions, and
therefore they will have no access unless they have a way to get to
another state.

Perhaps you should expand your research venues.

On 3/14/2013 11:13 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/14/2013 10:18 PM, Eisboch wrote:
For many, church teachings and
traditions are a buffet ... take what you like and leave the rest. I
see nothing wrong with that.




....except it's dismissive bull****. They don't "take what you like"...
You make decisions to follow teachings or not based on your own
experience and your willingness to sin for the mortal life. Sometimes
you decide to let the Lord judge you, not folks here who would "gage"
how much of a Christian somebody is.. as that alone shows a lack of
understanding and tolerance too...

Believe what you want. Do as you please, but don't break the law. And
you won't go to jail or hell.

On 3/15/2013 11:55 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/15/13 11:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/15/2013 11:25 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:55:57 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

No woman should be forced to bring an unwanted child into the world
just to comply with someone else's religious beliefs.


Kinda' like Row vs Wade forcing me to pay for someone else s abortions?

The $500 abortion is a lot cheaper than 18 years of welfare and a life
time of prison costs.


And more specifically which women in the US don't have access simply
because there is an so far unsuccessful lobby group out there?


As just one example, there is a single abortion provider in the state of
Mississippi, and next month the state will hold a license hearing on the
facility in an attempt to shut it down.

I think Kansas and several other backwards states are moving in similar
directions, and I know there are attempts in Virginia to shut down clinics.

So, there is an answer to your question. Women of Mississippi may soon
lose the one clinic in their state that provides abortions, and
therefore they will have no access unless they have a way to get to
another state.

Perhaps you should expand your research venues.

Yes, the answer to my question is there are no women in the US who don't
have access because of the Church.

On 3/15/13 12:09 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/15/2013 11:55 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/15/13 11:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/15/2013 11:25 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:55:57 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

No woman should be forced to bring an unwanted child into the world
just to comply with someone else's religious beliefs.


Kinda' like Row vs Wade forcing me to pay for someone else s
abortions?

The $500 abortion is a lot cheaper than 18 years of welfare and a life
time of prison costs.


And more specifically which women in the US don't have access simply
because there is an so far unsuccessful lobby group out there?


As just one example, there is a single abortion provider in the state of
Mississippi, and next month the state will hold a license hearing on the
facility in an attempt to shut it down.

I think Kansas and several other backwards states are moving in similar
directions, and I know there are attempts in Virginia to shut down
clinics.

So, there is an answer to your question. Women of Mississippi may soon
lose the one clinic in their state that provides abortions, and
therefore they will have no access unless they have a way to get to
another state.

Perhaps you should expand your research venues.

Yes, the answer to my question is there are no women in the US who don't
have access because of the Church.

If that Mississippi clinic is forced to close, lower income women in
Mississippi will not have reasonable access to a clinic, especially
since other southern states are proceeding similarly.

On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:23:30 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/15/13 12:09 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/15/2013 11:55 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/15/13 11:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/15/2013 11:25 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:55:57 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

No woman should be forced to bring an unwanted child into the world
just to comply with someone else's religious beliefs.


Kinda' like Row vs Wade forcing me to pay for someone else s
abortions?

The $500 abortion is a lot cheaper than 18 years of welfare and a life
time of prison costs.


And more specifically which women in the US don't have access simply
because there is an so far unsuccessful lobby group out there?


As just one example, there is a single abortion provider in the state of
Mississippi, and next month the state will hold a license hearing on the
facility in an attempt to shut it down.

I think Kansas and several other backwards states are moving in similar
directions, and I know there are attempts in Virginia to shut down
clinics.

So, there is an answer to your question. Women of Mississippi may soon
lose the one clinic in their state that provides abortions, and
therefore they will have no access unless they have a way to get to
another state.

Perhaps you should expand your research venues.

Yes, the answer to my question is there are no women in the US who don't
have access because of the Church.

If that Mississippi clinic is forced to close, lower income women in
Mississippi will not have reasonable access to a clinic, especially
since other southern states are proceeding similarly.

There are many other methods of birth control besides killing a baby. If there's only one clinic,
then very few folks have reasonable access to it anyway (remember all the problems you mentioned
yesterday?). Can they not get medical care at their local hospital? Perhaps education is the key.


Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

On 3/15/2013 12:23 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/15/13 12:09 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/15/2013 11:55 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/15/13 11:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/15/2013 11:25 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:55:57 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

No woman should be forced to bring an unwanted child into the world
just to comply with someone else's religious beliefs.


Kinda' like Row vs Wade forcing me to pay for someone else s
abortions?

The $500 abortion is a lot cheaper than 18 years of welfare and a life
time of prison costs.


And more specifically which women in the US don't have access simply
because there is an so far unsuccessful lobby group out there?


As just one example, there is a single abortion provider in the state of
Mississippi, and next month the state will hold a license hearing on the
facility in an attempt to shut it down.

I think Kansas and several other backwards states are moving in similar
directions, and I know there are attempts in Virginia to shut down
clinics.

So, there is an answer to your question. Women of Mississippi may soon
lose the one clinic in their state that provides abortions, and
therefore they will have no access unless they have a way to get to
another state.

Perhaps you should expand your research venues.

Yes, the answer to my question is there are no women in the US who don't
have access because of the Church.

If that Mississippi clinic is forced to close, lower income women in
Mississippi will not have reasonable access to a clinic, especially
since other southern states are proceeding similarly.

Let me know when it happens...

On 3/15/2013 12:30 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:23:30 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/15/13 12:09 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/15/2013 11:55 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/15/13 11:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/15/2013 11:25 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:55:57 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

No woman should be forced to bring an unwanted child into the world
just to comply with someone else's religious beliefs.


Kinda' like Row vs Wade forcing me to pay for someone else s
abortions?

The $500 abortion is a lot cheaper than 18 years of welfare and a life
time of prison costs.


And more specifically which women in the US don't have access simply
because there is an so far unsuccessful lobby group out there?


As just one example, there is a single abortion provider in the state of
Mississippi, and next month the state will hold a license hearing on the
facility in an attempt to shut it down.

I think Kansas and several other backwards states are moving in similar
directions, and I know there are attempts in Virginia to shut down
clinics.

So, there is an answer to your question. Women of Mississippi may soon
lose the one clinic in their state that provides abortions, and
therefore they will have no access unless they have a way to get to
another state.

Perhaps you should expand your research venues.

Yes, the answer to my question is there are no women in the US who don't
have access because of the Church.

If that Mississippi clinic is forced to close, lower income women in
Mississippi will not have reasonable access to a clinic, especially
since other southern states are proceeding similarly.

There are many other methods of birth control besides killing a baby. If there's only one clinic,
then very few folks have reasonable access to it anyway (remember all the problems you mentioned
yesterday?). Can they not get medical care at their local hospital? Perhaps education is the key.


Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

Doesn't seem to be a religious problem at all. It's the state
interfering with woman's rights.

On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:35:56 -0400, Meyer wrote:

On 3/15/2013 12:30 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:23:30 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/15/13 12:09 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/15/2013 11:55 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/15/13 11:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/15/2013 11:25 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:55:57 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

No woman should be forced to bring an unwanted child into the world
just to comply with someone else's religious beliefs.


Kinda' like Row vs Wade forcing me to pay for someone else s
abortions?

The $500 abortion is a lot cheaper than 18 years of welfare and a life
time of prison costs.


And more specifically which women in the US don't have access simply
because there is an so far unsuccessful lobby group out there?


As just one example, there is a single abortion provider in the state of
Mississippi, and next month the state will hold a license hearing on the
facility in an attempt to shut it down.

I think Kansas and several other backwards states are moving in similar
directions, and I know there are attempts in Virginia to shut down
clinics.

So, there is an answer to your question. Women of Mississippi may soon
lose the one clinic in their state that provides abortions, and
therefore they will have no access unless they have a way to get to
another state.

Perhaps you should expand your research venues.

Yes, the answer to my question is there are no women in the US who don't
have access because of the Church.

If that Mississippi clinic is forced to close, lower income women in
Mississippi will not have reasonable access to a clinic, especially
since other southern states are proceeding similarly.

There are many other methods of birth control besides killing a baby. If there's only one clinic,
then very few folks have reasonable access to it anyway (remember all the problems you mentioned
yesterday?). Can they not get medical care at their local hospital? Perhaps education is the key.


Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

Doesn't seem to be a religious problem at all. It's the state
interfering with woman's rights.

Maybe it's the state protecting the baby's rights!


Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

On 3/15/2013 7:51 AM, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:14:59 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

please tell us how this Pope, or his immediate
predecessors have adversely affected your life or interfered with your
beliefs.

========

The Roman Catholic church, led by the pope, has been a regressive
force against every attempt a population control. A major portion of
the world's problems are the result of over population and it's just
going to get worse until a majority of people recognize the issue.

One of the primary teachings of the Roman Catholic Church and most other
christian churches is the sanctity of life.

What is India's excuse, I mean the Hindi's excuse for not controlling
thier population.


Are you a adherent to Sanger's policies.

Does Wayne not believe in the sanctity of life as Krause does?