"jps" wrote in message
...

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:32:45 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:09:56 -0700, jps wrote:

According to the Post, law enforcement sources believed that the
teen
may have entered the home through a rear window and was not armed.

===

Entering someone else's through a rear window? Give me a break.
Would you have offered him tea and cookies?

Imagine what a schmuck you'd feel like if you didn't give the kid 10
seconds to explain himself and found that you'd just shot your
neighbor's kid who was too drunk to know the difference between
houses.

You want to carry that kind of weight around for the rest of your
life, like your compatriots here?

Ya'll put up a brave face but I have to wonder how many nights you'd
sit awake wondering how that kid's father and mother feel.

The callous responses here are astounding. Christians, no doubt.

-------------------------------------


Castle laws may give you legal authority but I'd have to be more
convinced that the intruder was an immediate threat to me or my wife
before I'd open fire. Shooting someone is pretty serious stuff.

On 3/18/13 3:21 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"jps" wrote in message ...

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:32:45 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:09:56 -0700, jps wrote:

According to the Post, law enforcement sources believed that the teen
may have entered the home through a rear window and was not armed.

===

Entering someone else's through a rear window? Give me a break.
Would you have offered him tea and cookies?

Imagine what a schmuck you'd feel like if you didn't give the kid 10
seconds to explain himself and found that you'd just shot your
neighbor's kid who was too drunk to know the difference between
houses.

You want to carry that kind of weight around for the rest of your
life, like your compatriots here?

Ya'll put up a brave face but I have to wonder how many nights you'd
sit awake wondering how that kid's father and mother feel.

The callous responses here are astounding. Christians, no doubt.

-------------------------------------


Castle laws may give you legal authority but I'd have to be more
convinced that the intruder was an immediate threat to me or my wife
before I'd open fire. Shooting someone is pretty serious stuff.



Depends on who is breaking in. If it is a 50+ year old little **** with
an ugly puss and an attitude breaking in, it is probably PsychoSnotty, a
guy who would be up to no good, according to all the threats he has made
here. He's not a kid and he wouldn't be a wayward drunk in our
neighborhood.

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:21:35 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote
"jps" wrote in message
...


On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:32:45 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:


On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:09:56 -0700, jps wrote:

According to the Post, law enforcement sources believed that the
teen
may have entered the home through a rear window and was not armed.

===

Entering someone else's through a rear window? Give me a break.
Would you have offered him tea and cookies?


Imagine what a schmuck you'd feel like if you didn't give the kid 10
seconds to explain himself and found that you'd just shot your
neighbor's kid who was too drunk to know the difference between
houses.


You want to carry that kind of weight around for the rest of your
life, like your compatriots here?


Ya'll put up a brave face but I have to wonder how many nights you'd
sit awake wondering how that kid's father and mother feel.


The callous responses here are astounding. Christians, no doubt.


-------------------------------------




Castle laws may give you legal authority but I'd have to be more
convinced that the intruder was an immediate threat to me or my
wife
before I'd open fire. Shooting someone is pretty serious stuff.

Depending on his motives, you might not have much time to make up
your mind.
But according to harry, it's a no brainer.

On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:02:01 -0400, Meyer wrote:

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:21:35 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote
"jps" wrote in message
...


On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:32:45 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:


On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:09:56 -0700, jps wrote:

According to the Post, law enforcement sources believed that the
teen
may have entered the home through a rear window and was not armed.

===

Entering someone else's through a rear window? Give me a break.
Would you have offered him tea and cookies?


Imagine what a schmuck you'd feel like if you didn't give the kid 10
seconds to explain himself and found that you'd just shot your
neighbor's kid who was too drunk to know the difference between
houses.


You want to carry that kind of weight around for the rest of your
life, like your compatriots here?


Ya'll put up a brave face but I have to wonder how many nights you'd
sit awake wondering how that kid's father and mother feel.


The callous responses here are astounding. Christians, no doubt.


-------------------------------------




Castle laws may give you legal authority but I'd have to be more
convinced that the intruder was an immediate threat to me or my
wife
before I'd open fire. Shooting someone is pretty serious stuff.

Depending on his motives, you might not have much time to make up
your mind.
But according to harry, it's a no brainer.

And, a warning shot was fired. I hope the ceiling didn't suffer too much.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

On 3/19/2013 11:02 AM, Meyer wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:21:35 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote
"jps" wrote in message
...


On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:32:45 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:


On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:09:56 -0700, jps wrote:

According to the Post, law enforcement sources believed that the teen
may have entered the home through a rear window and was not armed.

===

Entering someone else's through a rear window? Give me a break.
Would you have offered him tea and cookies?


Imagine what a schmuck you'd feel like if you didn't give the kid 10
seconds to explain himself and found that you'd just shot your
neighbor's kid who was too drunk to know the difference between
houses.


You want to carry that kind of weight around for the rest of your
life, like your compatriots here?


Ya'll put up a brave face but I have to wonder how many nights you'd
sit awake wondering how that kid's father and mother feel.


The callous responses here are astounding. Christians, no doubt.


-------------------------------------




Castle laws may give you legal authority but I'd have to be more
convinced that the intruder was an immediate threat to me or my
wife
before I'd open fire. Shooting someone is pretty serious stuff.

Depending on his motives, you might not have much time to make up your
mind.
But according to harry, it's a no brainer.

According to everything harry has said over the years, the kid would
have been dead at his home too...

On 3/18/2013 2:49 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:32:45 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:09:56 -0700, jps wrote:

According to the Post, law enforcement sources believed that the teen
may have entered the home through a rear window and was not armed.

===

Entering someone else's through a rear window? Give me a break.
Would you have offered him tea and cookies?

Imagine what a schmuck you'd feel like if you didn't give the kid 10
seconds to explain himself

Oh brother, did you and harry talk about the "ten seconds" talking point
before hand? Cause 10 seconds is a lot of ****ing time even if nobody
has a weapon... Why not make it two? How about 45?

Learn to exchange ideas, then someone might take you seriously instead
of just laughing at you here...

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:24:43 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/18/2013 2:49 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:32:45 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:09:56 -0700, jps wrote:

According to the Post, law enforcement sources believed that the teen
may have entered the home through a rear window and was not armed.

===

Entering someone else's through a rear window? Give me a break.
Would you have offered him tea and cookies?

Imagine what a schmuck you'd feel like if you didn't give the kid 10
seconds to explain himself

Oh brother, did you and harry talk about the "ten seconds" talking point
before hand? Cause 10 seconds is a lot of ****ing time even if nobody
has a weapon... Why not make it two? How about 45?

Learn to exchange ideas, then someone might take you seriously instead
of just laughing at you here...

God you are a sad sack of ****. Even when someone is being civil with
you, you cannot help but spew your stupid bile.

In article ,
says...

On 3/18/2013 2:49 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:32:45 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:09:56 -0700, jps wrote:

According to the Post, law enforcement sources believed that the teen
may have entered the home through a rear window and was not armed.

===

Entering someone else's through a rear window? Give me a break.
Would you have offered him tea and cookies?

Imagine what a schmuck you'd feel like if you didn't give the kid 10
seconds to explain himself

Oh brother, did you and harry talk about the "ten seconds" talking point
before hand? Cause 10 seconds is a lot of ****ing time even if nobody
has a weapon... Why not make it two? How about 45?

Learn to exchange ideas, then someone might take you seriously instead
of just laughing at you here...

The vulgarities start, next, completely insane babble, nasty vulgar lies
about poster's and their families, racial slurs, etc.

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:32:45 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:09:56 -0700, jps wrote:

According to the Post, law enforcement sources believed that the teen
may have entered the home through a rear window and was not armed.

===

Entering someone else's through a rear window? Give me a break.
Would you have offered him tea and cookies?

Imagine what a schmuck you'd feel like if you didn't give the kid 10
seconds to explain himself and found that you'd just shot your
neighbor's kid who was too drunk to know the difference between
houses.

You want to carry that kind of weight around for the rest of your
life, like your compatriots here?

Ya'll put up a brave face but I have to wonder how many nights you'd
sit awake wondering how that kid's father and mother feel.

The callous responses here are astounding. Christians, no doubt.

Remember that gun nuts are frequently shooting and killing kin.
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013...eports-father-
accidentally-shoots-kills-10-month-old-son-in-front-of-family?lite
I didn't bother chasing links. Just typed accident shot son in google.
So it's no surprise this kid got killed.
What's really funny is except for Eisboch, apparently none of the jokers
here have been "out of it" drunk, or seen an "out of it" drunk.
Makes you wonder about their life experience, morality, and judgment.

On 3/18/13 4:36 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:32:45 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:09:56 -0700, jps wrote:

According to the Post, law enforcement sources believed that the teen
may have entered the home through a rear window and was not armed.

===

Entering someone else's through a rear window? Give me a break.
Would you have offered him tea and cookies?

Imagine what a schmuck you'd feel like if you didn't give the kid 10
seconds to explain himself and found that you'd just shot your
neighbor's kid who was too drunk to know the difference between
houses.

You want to carry that kind of weight around for the rest of your
life, like your compatriots here?

Ya'll put up a brave face but I have to wonder how many nights you'd
sit awake wondering how that kid's father and mother feel.

The callous responses here are astounding. Christians, no doubt.

Remember that gun nuts are frequently shooting and killing kin.
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013...eports-father-
accidentally-shoots-kills-10-month-old-son-in-front-of-family?lite
I didn't bother chasing links. Just typed accident shot son in google.
So it's no surprise this kid got killed.
What's really funny is except for Eisboch, apparently none of the jokers
here have been "out of it" drunk, or seen an "out of it" drunk.
Makes you wonder about their life experience, morality, and judgment.



Neither my wife nor I drink, and we know how to get into the house if
we've forgotten or lost our keys. Therefore, someone forcing his way in
late at night is...a home invader.