On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:28:27 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:23:01 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

an overeager asshole who shot before he could properly
assess the situation.

You don't know that at all...


But do make it up as you go along, just like the Zimmerman case... Or
Sharpton/Brawley..

My take away from Zimmerman is even if you are right and the shooting
is justified, it still may cost you $300,000 to stay out of jail.

My takeaway is that if you're looking for trouble with a gun in your
hand, you're likely to find it.

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:26:36 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:21:05 -0700, jps wrote:

====

Sorry you didn't like my offer of tea and cookies.

At our house we make it a point to leave no doors or windows unlocked
at night. Anyone entering has already forced their way in, and in my
mind, that is justification enough to open fire. State law agrees
with that position.

Well then, I'm glad you didn't accidently kill one of your kids for
being stupid.

===

Don't know about your kids but mine are smart enough to not try and
force their way into a house.

Are all kids just like yours? Kids between 14 and 19 are brain
scrambled and likely to make stupid errors in judgement. Should they
be subject to death because they've made an error in judgement?

While this is an unfortunate turn of events, common sense tells me the
shooter was a trigger happy idiot. The kid was unarmed.

On 3/18/2013 10:33 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:28:27 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:23:01 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

an overeager asshole who shot before he could properly
assess the situation.

You don't know that at all...


But do make it up as you go along, just like the Zimmerman case... Or
Sharpton/Brawley..

My take away from Zimmerman is even if you are right and the shooting
is justified, it still may cost you $300,000 to stay out of jail.

My takeaway is that if you're looking for trouble with a gun in your
hand, you're likely to find it.


Well of course it is... Something happened to you with your guns and not
you are an advocate, we get it...

On 3/18/2013 10:39 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:26:36 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:


While this is an unfortunate turn of events, common sense tells me the
shooter was a trigger happy idiot.

More of your ideological loogieisms...

On Monday, March 18, 2013 12:09:56 PM UTC-4, jps wrote:
Looks like this drunk teen tried to get in a house just two doors from
his own. His reward? Shot to death by "a helper, someone who spends
spare time volunteering to help others."

The kid wasn't armed, was drunk and a neighbor from two doors down.

This is what Merika has come to...


At 2:30 a.m., how is a homeowner supposed to know that an intruder is unarmed, and when the intruder is six feet tall, what difference does that make?

The kid lived "just two doors down," in a flop house with transient residents the rest of the neighbors wouldn't recognize either.

Here's what happens to homeowners who live in liberal paradises where they're not able to own guns for self-defense.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/...l?tid=obinsite

When the burglar alarm is ringing, a large male is coming up the stairs, and you're not Chuck Norris, my advice to you is: pull the trigger. Stop blaming America for the actions of irresponsible people -- in this case, the intoxicated teen, his friends, and his parents.

On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:05:51 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:39:01 -0700, jps wrote:

Don't know about your kids but mine are smart enough to not try and
force their way into a house.

Are all kids just like yours? Kids between 14 and 19 are brain
scrambled and likely to make stupid errors in judgement. Should they
be subject to death because they've made an error in judgement?

While this is an unfortunate turn of events, common sense tells me the
shooter was a trigger happy idiot. The kid was unarmed.

"Unarmed" really doesn't mean much. Over 700 people a year are beaten
to death with bare hands, another 500 or so are killed by weapons of
opportunity (blunt objects mostly).

My bet is that the shooter didn't wait to find out intent.

On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:22:34 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Monday, March 18, 2013 12:09:56 PM UTC-4, jps wrote:
Looks like this drunk teen tried to get in a house just two doors from
his own. His reward? Shot to death by "a helper, someone who spends
spare time volunteering to help others."

The kid wasn't armed, was drunk and a neighbor from two doors down.

This is what Merika has come to...


At 2:30 a.m., how is a homeowner supposed to know that an intruder is unarmed, and when the intruder is six feet tall, what difference does that make?

The kid lived "just two doors down," in a flop house with transient residents the rest of the neighbors wouldn't recognize either.

Here's what happens to homeowners who live in liberal paradises where they're not able to own guns for self-defense.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/...l?tid=obinsite

When the burglar alarm is ringing, a large male is coming up the stairs, and you're not Chuck Norris, my advice to you is: pull the trigger. Stop blaming America for the actions of irresponsible people -- in this case, the intoxicated teen, his friends, and his parents.

Merika, where we shoot first and ask questions later.

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:39:01 -0700, jps wrote:

Don't know about your kids but mine are smart enough to not try and
force their way into a house.

Are all kids just like yours? Kids between 14 and 19 are brain
scrambled and likely to make stupid errors in judgement. Should they
be subject to death because they've made an error in judgement?

=====

Teenagers die because of stupid errors in judgement every day, most
often behind the wheel of a car. It's been going on for years.

On 3/19/2013 5:03 AM, jps wrote:


My bet is that the shooter didn't wait to find out intent.


Yes, we wouldn't expect anything less of you..

On 3/19/2013 5:05 AM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:22:34 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Monday, March 18, 2013 12:09:56 PM UTC-4, jps wrote:
Looks like this drunk teen tried to get in a house just two doors from
his own. His reward? Shot to death by "a helper, someone who spends
spare time volunteering to help others."

The kid wasn't armed, was drunk and a neighbor from two doors down.

This is what Merika has come to...


At 2:30 a.m., how is a homeowner supposed to know that an intruder is unarmed, and when the intruder is six feet tall, what difference does that make?

The kid lived "just two doors down," in a flop house with transient residents the rest of the neighbors wouldn't recognize either.

Here's what happens to homeowners who live in liberal paradises where they're not able to own guns for self-defense.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/...l?tid=obinsite

When the burglar alarm is ringing, a large male is coming up the stairs, and you're not Chuck Norris, my advice to you is: pull the trigger. Stop blaming America for the actions of irresponsible people -- in this case, the intoxicated teen, his friends, and his parents.

Merika, where we shoot first and ask questions later.


Nobody said that... you are still nothing but a liar. Now tell us why
your guns were taken away? Did you have an incident?