On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:08:48 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 10:55 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:02:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 9:56 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:51:15 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 9:45 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:37:51 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 8:50 AM, Eisboch wrote:
Looks like they will for many, despite popular claims to the contrary:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324557804578374761054496682.html



Yet another reason to get rid of health insurance companies, who do
nothing but skim money out of the health care delivery system.

Isn't the socialist goal 'Medicare for all'?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.



Aren't you on medicare or some variation of it?

Yup, but I paid (and pay) for mine, without a 'tax credit'. That's the big difference, ESAD.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.


So, you have no objection to a single-payer system. Good.

Isn't the socialist goal 'Medicare for all'?


Salmonbait



Is this another in your series of your moronic, oft-repeated mantras?


Did you answer the question?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

"J Herring" wrote in message
...

On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 08:50:53 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Looks like they will for many, despite popular claims to the contrary:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324557804578374761054496682.html

Apparently the unions are starting to see the light also...

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/unions-grow-wary-health-law-034700539.html?l=1


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.


-----------------------

What is really going to rile the people is even with a tax credit, people
can not afford the $20,000 premiums the first year. Pay now and in a year
get a tax credit. Pay 80% of your income for insurance?

On 3/22/2013 9:37 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/22/13 8:50 AM, Eisboch wrote:
Looks like they will for many, despite popular claims to the contrary:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324557804578374761054496682.html




Yet another reason to get rid of health insurance companies, who do
nothing but skim money out of the health care delivery system.

Sorry. No need to pander to unions anymore. The votes have been counted
and he's a lame duck.

On 3/22/13 11:43 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:08:48 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 10:55 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:02:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 9:56 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:51:15 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 9:45 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:37:51 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 8:50 AM, Eisboch wrote:
Looks like they will for many, despite popular claims to the contrary:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324557804578374761054496682.html



Yet another reason to get rid of health insurance companies, who do
nothing but skim money out of the health care delivery system.

Isn't the socialist goal 'Medicare for all'?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.



Aren't you on medicare or some variation of it?

Yup, but I paid (and pay) for mine, without a 'tax credit'. That's the big difference, ESAD.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.


So, you have no objection to a single-payer system. Good.

Isn't the socialist goal 'Medicare for all'?


Salmonbait



Is this another in your series of your moronic, oft-repeated mantras?


Did you answer the question?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.



Oh. No, it isn't.

On 3/22/2013 11:08 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/22/13 10:55 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:02:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 9:56 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:51:15 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 9:45 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:37:51 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

On 3/22/13 8:50 AM, Eisboch wrote:
Looks like they will for many, despite popular claims to the
contrary:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324557804578374761054496682.html




Yet another reason to get rid of health insurance companies, who do
nothing but skim money out of the health care delivery system.

Isn't the socialist goal 'Medicare for all'?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.



Aren't you on medicare or some variation of it?

Yup, but I paid (and pay) for mine, without a 'tax credit'. That's
the big difference, ESAD.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.


So, you have no objection to a single-payer system. Good.

Isn't the socialist goal 'Medicare for all'?


Salmonbait



Is this another in your series of your moronic, oft-repeated mantras?


Speaking of stupid signature lines. Yours seem to have disappeared
lately. Wassup with dat?

In article ,
says...

On 3/22/13 10:55 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:02:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 9:56 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:51:15 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 9:45 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:37:51 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 8:50 AM, Eisboch wrote:
Looks like they will for many, despite popular claims to the contrary:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324557804578374761054496682.html



Yet another reason to get rid of health insurance companies, who do
nothing but skim money out of the health care delivery system.

Isn't the socialist goal 'Medicare for all'?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.



Aren't you on medicare or some variation of it?

Yup, but I paid (and pay) for mine, without a 'tax credit'. That's the big difference, ESAD.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.


So, you have no objection to a single-payer system. Good.

Isn't the socialist goal 'Medicare for all'?


Salmonbait



Is this another in your series of your moronic, oft-repeated mantras?

You must learn, if it doesn't positively influence John, then it's bad.
BUT, if it's something that saves him a penny, it's all good.

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:08:48 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 10:55 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:02:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 9:56 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:51:15 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 9:45 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:37:51 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 8:50 AM, Eisboch wrote:
Looks like they will for many, despite popular claims to the contrary:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324557804578374761054496682.html



Yet another reason to get rid of health insurance companies, who do
nothing but skim money out of the health care delivery system.

Isn't the socialist goal 'Medicare for all'?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.



Aren't you on medicare or some variation of it?

Yup, but I paid (and pay) for mine, without a 'tax credit'. That's the big difference, ESAD.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.


So, you have no objection to a single-payer system. Good.

Isn't the socialist goal 'Medicare for all'?


Salmonbait



Is this another in your series of your moronic, oft-repeated mantras?


Did you answer the question?


Salmonbait

He probably didn't answer because you asked a Socialist.

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:02:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:




So, you have no objection to a single-payer system. Good.

I am taking the medicare voucher that everyone on the left hates and
it seems to be working out well for me.

Are you sure that "everyone on the left" hates it, or is that just an
ASSumption?

"Meyer" wrote in message
eb.com...

On 3/22/2013 9:37 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/22/13 8:50 AM, Eisboch wrote:
Looks like they will for many, despite popular claims to the contrary:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324557804578374761054496682.html




Yet another reason to get rid of health insurance companies, who do
nothing but skim money out of the health care delivery system.

Sorry. No need to pander to unions anymore. The votes have been counted
and he's a lame duck.
----------------------

Problem is the unions are government workers. Twice as many union postal
workers as union auto workers.

On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 08:50:53 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Looks like they will for many, despite popular claims to the contrary:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324557804578374761054496682.html

Claims by who? The only claims have been to reduce the rate of the
increases. We need a system that can actually negotiate with drug
companies, and we need some laws that ban nonsense prices, such as
chargemaster.