On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 07:09:46 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/29/2013 7:06 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:41:18 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:10:35 -0700, jps wrote:

that gunshot fired a year
ago in East Baltimore


Maryland has some of the strictest gun laws in the country. They must
not really be that effective I guess.

The facts are a bit more nuance that making the case either way on
strict gun laws, except it seems with regard to carry permits. Those
cause more problems.

http://factcheck.org/2012/12/gun-rhetoric-vs-gun-facts/

Why doens't the article pick a date and compare all scenarios using the same time period?


Because they have a political agenda... There should be a site out there
dedicated to getting the facts out, but it's not this one

Well, you have a stupid agenda, but we don't hold it against you
because you ARE stupid.

In article , says...

On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 07:09:46 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/29/2013 7:06 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:41:18 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:10:35 -0700, jps wrote:

that gunshot fired a year
ago in East Baltimore


Maryland has some of the strictest gun laws in the country. They must
not really be that effective I guess.

The facts are a bit more nuance that making the case either way on
strict gun laws, except it seems with regard to carry permits. Those
cause more problems.

http://factcheck.org/2012/12/gun-rhetoric-vs-gun-facts/

Why doens't the article pick a date and compare all scenarios using the same time period?


Because they have a political agenda... There should be a site out there
dedicated to getting the facts out, but it's not this one

Well, you have a stupid agenda, but we don't hold it against you
because you ARE stupid.

Some day in the future you are going sit down and wonder where all of your freedoms went.
Then you may sit back and come to the realization that the non-stupid won. Enjoy your police
state.

On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:23:35 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , says...

On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 07:09:46 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/29/2013 7:06 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:41:18 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:10:35 -0700, jps wrote:

that gunshot fired a year
ago in East Baltimore


Maryland has some of the strictest gun laws in the country. They must
not really be that effective I guess.

The facts are a bit more nuance that making the case either way on
strict gun laws, except it seems with regard to carry permits. Those
cause more problems.

http://factcheck.org/2012/12/gun-rhetoric-vs-gun-facts/

Why doens't the article pick a date and compare all scenarios using the same time period?


Because they have a political agenda... There should be a site out there
dedicated to getting the facts out, but it's not this one

Well, you have a stupid agenda, but we don't hold it against you
because you ARE stupid.

Some day in the future you are going sit down and wonder where all of your freedoms went.
Then you may sit back and come to the realization that the non-stupid won. Enjoy your police
state.

Come on. There's absolutely no evidence or even a hint of evidence
that anything even close to this is in our future. This is a paranoid,
hide under the mattress with some guns and 20,000 rounds of ammo
diatribe that the right wingers dredge up when they have nothing of
substance to say.

In article , says...

On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:23:35 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , says...

On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 07:09:46 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/29/2013 7:06 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:41:18 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:10:35 -0700, jps wrote:

that gunshot fired a year
ago in East Baltimore


Maryland has some of the strictest gun laws in the country. They must
not really be that effective I guess.

The facts are a bit more nuance that making the case either way on
strict gun laws, except it seems with regard to carry permits. Those
cause more problems.

http://factcheck.org/2012/12/gun-rhetoric-vs-gun-facts/

Why doens't the article pick a date and compare all scenarios using the same time period?


Because they have a political agenda... There should be a site out there
dedicated to getting the facts out, but it's not this one

Well, you have a stupid agenda, but we don't hold it against you
because you ARE stupid.

Some day in the future you are going sit down and wonder where all of your freedoms went.
Then you may sit back and come to the realization that the non-stupid won. Enjoy your police
state.

Come on. There's absolutely no evidence or even a hint of evidence
that anything even close to this is in our future. This is a paranoid,
hide under the mattress with some guns and 20,000 rounds of ammo
diatribe that the right wingers dredge up when they have nothing of
substance to say.

You are blind to what is happening in the USA.

On 4/2/2013 7:35 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:23:35 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , says...

On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 07:09:46 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/29/2013 7:06 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:41:18 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:10:35 -0700, jps wrote:

that gunshot fired a year
ago in East Baltimore


Maryland has some of the strictest gun laws in the country. They must
not really be that effective I guess.

The facts are a bit more nuance that making the case either way on
strict gun laws, except it seems with regard to carry permits. Those
cause more problems.

http://factcheck.org/2012/12/gun-rhetoric-vs-gun-facts/

Why doens't the article pick a date and compare all scenarios using the same time period?


Because they have a political agenda... There should be a site out there
dedicated to getting the facts out, but it's not this one

Well, you have a stupid agenda, but we don't hold it against you
because you ARE stupid.

Some day in the future you are going sit down and wonder where all of your freedoms went.
Then you may sit back and come to the realization that the non-stupid won. Enjoy your police
state.

Come on. There's absolutely no evidence or even a hint of evidence
that anything even close to this is in our future. This is a paranoid,
hide under the mattress with some guns and 20,000 rounds of ammo
diatribe that the right wingers dredge up when they have nothing of
substance to say.

You are blind to what is happening in the USA.


**** is already starting. In California they just repealed a 50% small
business tax break and furthermore are sending bills for years already
filed legally by business...

In article ,
says...

On 4/2/2013 7:35 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:23:35 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , says...

On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 07:09:46 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/29/2013 7:06 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:41:18 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:10:35 -0700, jps wrote:

that gunshot fired a year
ago in East Baltimore


Maryland has some of the strictest gun laws in the country. They must
not really be that effective I guess.

The facts are a bit more nuance that making the case either way on
strict gun laws, except it seems with regard to carry permits. Those
cause more problems.

http://factcheck.org/2012/12/gun-rhetoric-vs-gun-facts/

Why doens't the article pick a date and compare all scenarios using the same time period?


Because they have a political agenda... There should be a site out there
dedicated to getting the facts out, but it's not this one

Well, you have a stupid agenda, but we don't hold it against you
because you ARE stupid.

Some day in the future you are going sit down and wonder where all of your freedoms went.
Then you may sit back and come to the realization that the non-stupid won. Enjoy your police
state.

Come on. There's absolutely no evidence or even a hint of evidence
that anything even close to this is in our future. This is a paranoid,
hide under the mattress with some guns and 20,000 rounds of ammo
diatribe that the right wingers dredge up when they have nothing of
substance to say.

You are blind to what is happening in the USA.


**** is already starting. In California they just repealed a 50% small
business tax break and furthermore are sending bills for years already
filed legally by business...

Insane Scotty strikes again!!!

On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 07:35:28 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , says...

On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:23:35 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , says...

On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 07:09:46 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/29/2013 7:06 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:41:18 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:10:35 -0700, jps wrote:

that gunshot fired a year
ago in East Baltimore


Maryland has some of the strictest gun laws in the country. They must
not really be that effective I guess.

The facts are a bit more nuance that making the case either way on
strict gun laws, except it seems with regard to carry permits. Those
cause more problems.

http://factcheck.org/2012/12/gun-rhetoric-vs-gun-facts/

Why doens't the article pick a date and compare all scenarios using the same time period?


Because they have a political agenda... There should be a site out there
dedicated to getting the facts out, but it's not this one

Well, you have a stupid agenda, but we don't hold it against you
because you ARE stupid.

Some day in the future you are going sit down and wonder where all of your freedoms went.
Then you may sit back and come to the realization that the non-stupid won. Enjoy your police
state.

Come on. There's absolutely no evidence or even a hint of evidence
that anything even close to this is in our future. This is a paranoid,
hide under the mattress with some guns and 20,000 rounds of ammo
diatribe that the right wingers dredge up when they have nothing of
substance to say.

You are blind to what is happening in the USA.

I'm not blind to your unflinching paranoid delusions.

On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:32:47 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 4/2/2013 7:35 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:23:35 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , says...

On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 07:09:46 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/29/2013 7:06 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:41:18 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:10:35 -0700, jps wrote:

that gunshot fired a year
ago in East Baltimore


Maryland has some of the strictest gun laws in the country. They must
not really be that effective I guess.

The facts are a bit more nuance that making the case either way on
strict gun laws, except it seems with regard to carry permits. Those
cause more problems.

http://factcheck.org/2012/12/gun-rhetoric-vs-gun-facts/

Why doens't the article pick a date and compare all scenarios using the same time period?


Because they have a political agenda... There should be a site out there
dedicated to getting the facts out, but it's not this one

Well, you have a stupid agenda, but we don't hold it against you
because you ARE stupid.

Some day in the future you are going sit down and wonder where all of your freedoms went.
Then you may sit back and come to the realization that the non-stupid won. Enjoy your police
state.

Come on. There's absolutely no evidence or even a hint of evidence
that anything even close to this is in our future. This is a paranoid,
hide under the mattress with some guns and 20,000 rounds of ammo
diatribe that the right wingers dredge up when they have nothing of
substance to say.

You are blind to what is happening in the USA.


**** is already starting. In California they just repealed a 50% small
business tax break and furthermore are sending bills for years already
filed legally by business...

Insane Scotty strikes again!!!

They're feeling each other up... mentally that is... to see who's
crazier.

On 4/2/2013 8:49 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:32:47 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 4/2/2013 7:35 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:23:35 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , says...

On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 07:09:46 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/29/2013 7:06 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:41:18 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:10:35 -0700, jps wrote:

that gunshot fired a year
ago in East Baltimore


Maryland has some of the strictest gun laws in the country. They must
not really be that effective I guess.

The facts are a bit more nuance that making the case either way on
strict gun laws, except it seems with regard to carry permits. Those
cause more problems.

http://factcheck.org/2012/12/gun-rhetoric-vs-gun-facts/

Why doens't the article pick a date and compare all scenarios using the same time period?


Because they have a political agenda... There should be a site out there
dedicated to getting the facts out, but it's not this one

Well, you have a stupid agenda, but we don't hold it against you
because you ARE stupid.

Some day in the future you are going sit down and wonder where all of your freedoms went.
Then you may sit back and come to the realization that the non-stupid won. Enjoy your police
state.

Come on. There's absolutely no evidence or even a hint of evidence
that anything even close to this is in our future. This is a paranoid,
hide under the mattress with some guns and 20,000 rounds of ammo
diatribe that the right wingers dredge up when they have nothing of
substance to say.

You are blind to what is happening in the USA.


**** is already starting. In California they just repealed a 50% small
business tax break and furthermore are sending bills for years already
filed legally by business...

Insane Scotty strikes again!!!

They're feeling each other up... mentally that is... to see who's
crazier.


Drunken Kevin Noble strikes again....

On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:07:10 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 4/2/2013 8:49 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:32:47 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 4/2/2013 7:35 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:23:35 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , says...

On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 07:09:46 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/29/2013 7:06 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:41:18 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:10:35 -0700, jps wrote:

that gunshot fired a year
ago in East Baltimore


Maryland has some of the strictest gun laws in the country. They must
not really be that effective I guess.

The facts are a bit more nuance that making the case either way on
strict gun laws, except it seems with regard to carry permits. Those
cause more problems.

http://factcheck.org/2012/12/gun-rhetoric-vs-gun-facts/

Why doens't the article pick a date and compare all scenarios using the same time period?


Because they have a political agenda... There should be a site out there
dedicated to getting the facts out, but it's not this one

Well, you have a stupid agenda, but we don't hold it against you
because you ARE stupid.

Some day in the future you are going sit down and wonder where all of your freedoms went.
Then you may sit back and come to the realization that the non-stupid won. Enjoy your police
state.

Come on. There's absolutely no evidence or even a hint of evidence
that anything even close to this is in our future. This is a paranoid,
hide under the mattress with some guns and 20,000 rounds of ammo
diatribe that the right wingers dredge up when they have nothing of
substance to say.

You are blind to what is happening in the USA.


**** is already starting. In California they just repealed a 50% small
business tax break and furthermore are sending bills for years already
filed legally by business...

Insane Scotty strikes again!!!

They're feeling each other up... mentally that is... to see who's
crazier.


Drunken Kevin Noble strikes again....

I'm kevin again? So, who the **** is kevin?