Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,756
Default Here you go Dick...

On Friday, 29 March 2013 09:41:16 UTC-3, Eisboch wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message

...



On 3/29/13 8:16 AM, Eisboch wrote:





"F.O.A.D." wrote in message


news




On 3/29/13 6:43 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:


... you know guys, if you stop looking to Anderson Cooper and


Racheal


Maddcow for your news, you may even become an informed American


voter....




http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...dhs-stocks-up/








Soooo, take a quick check and verify what I said earlier like Greg


usually does for me... I don't make this **** up, even if you don't


like


the way I present it.






You ignorant little ****, do you even read what you post before you


post


it and then claim "facts" not in play?




From your article:




Local law enforcement face ammo shortage as gun owners, DHS stock up




Published March 23, 2013




| FoxNews.com






Ammo *is* in short supply, an artificial situation caused by gun


owners


and ammo manufactuers, the former because they are just plain stupid


sheeples and the latter because they see a way to make extra bucks.




Who is a stupid sheeple? Your buddy Herring, for one, who apparently


drives over to Wal-Mart every morning to see if he can buy five more


boxes of ammo.




If the DHS wants to buy a boatload of ammo over the next five years,


it


will contract directly with the manufacturers, and the manufacturers


who


get the contracts will ramp up production of the calibers the agency


wants. There is no shortage of ammo manufacturers willing to suck on


the


government's teat for five years.






----------------------------------




Heh. I just scolded him for the same thing. I think he reads the


headlines only, not the article.






It is embarrassing that Scotty even claims to have graduated from a

high

school in Connecticut.



=======================



What really surprises me is the number of reasonably well educated

people (meaning they should be able to read and comprehend) who share

Scott's paranoia regarding guns and ammo shortages. Not all, but

some people I talk to or meet when I go to the range talk the same

talk and some are lawyers or other educated professionals. There are

a few obvious "preppers" here and there, but not many. Most of the

conversations center on types of firearms, experiences with them,

likes and dislikes, etc., but I am still surprised at the number of

people who think the government is plotting to take away their right

to own a gun.


We went through all that when a previous Liberal Gov't brought in long arm registration a number of years ago. We already had fairly restrictive handgun controls.
People pointed to Australia.. claimed that the gov't was going to first force us to register and then take our firearms.
I registered and I still have my 20 ga shotgun and my 22 cal semi-auto rifle with 6x scope.
Our current Conservative govt just abolished the firearm registry last year.
Handguns are still heavily restricted, of course.
  #12   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,605
Default Here you go Dick...

On 3/29/13 9:11 AM, True North wrote:
On Friday, 29 March 2013 09:41:16 UTC-3, Eisboch wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message

...



On 3/29/13 8:16 AM, Eisboch wrote:





"F.O.A.D." wrote in message


news




On 3/29/13 6:43 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:


... you know guys, if you stop looking to Anderson Cooper and


Racheal


Maddcow for your news, you may even become an informed American


voter....




http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...dhs-stocks-up/








Soooo, take a quick check and verify what I said earlier like Greg


usually does for me... I don't make this **** up, even if you don't


like


the way I present it.






You ignorant little ****, do you even read what you post before you


post


it and then claim "facts" not in play?




From your article:




Local law enforcement face ammo shortage as gun owners, DHS stock up




Published March 23, 2013




| FoxNews.com






Ammo *is* in short supply, an artificial situation caused by gun


owners


and ammo manufactuers, the former because they are just plain stupid


sheeples and the latter because they see a way to make extra bucks.




Who is a stupid sheeple? Your buddy Herring, for one, who apparently


drives over to Wal-Mart every morning to see if he can buy five more


boxes of ammo.




If the DHS wants to buy a boatload of ammo over the next five years,


it


will contract directly with the manufacturers, and the manufacturers


who


get the contracts will ramp up production of the calibers the agency


wants. There is no shortage of ammo manufacturers willing to suck on


the


government's teat for five years.






----------------------------------




Heh. I just scolded him for the same thing. I think he reads the


headlines only, not the article.






It is embarrassing that Scotty even claims to have graduated from a

high

school in Connecticut.



=======================



What really surprises me is the number of reasonably well educated

people (meaning they should be able to read and comprehend) who share

Scott's paranoia regarding guns and ammo shortages. Not all, but

some people I talk to or meet when I go to the range talk the same

talk and some are lawyers or other educated professionals. There are

a few obvious "preppers" here and there, but not many. Most of the

conversations center on types of firearms, experiences with them,

likes and dislikes, etc., but I am still surprised at the number of

people who think the government is plotting to take away their right

to own a gun.


We went through all that when a previous Liberal Gov't brought in long arm registration a number of years ago. We already had fairly restrictive handgun controls.
People pointed to Australia.. claimed that the gov't was going to first force us to register and then take our firearms.
I registered and I still have my 20 ga shotgun and my 22 cal semi-auto rifle with 6x scope.
Our current Conservative govt just abolished the firearm registry last year.
Handguns are still heavily restricted, of course.


Canadians and Canadian gun laws are far more rational than Americans and
American gun laws.
  #13   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2013
Posts: 569
Default Here you go Dick...

On 3/29/2013 9:11 AM, True North wrote:
On Friday, 29 March 2013 09:41:16 UTC-3, Eisboch wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message

...



On 3/29/13 8:16 AM, Eisboch wrote:





"F.O.A.D." wrote in message


news




On 3/29/13 6:43 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:


... you know guys, if you stop looking to Anderson Cooper and


Racheal


Maddcow for your news, you may even become an informed American


voter....




http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...dhs-stocks-up/








Soooo, take a quick check and verify what I said earlier like Greg


usually does for me... I don't make this **** up, even if you don't


like


the way I present it.






You ignorant little ****, do you even read what you post before you


post


it and then claim "facts" not in play?




From your article:




Local law enforcement face ammo shortage as gun owners, DHS stock up




Published March 23, 2013




| FoxNews.com






Ammo *is* in short supply, an artificial situation caused by gun


owners


and ammo manufactuers, the former because they are just plain stupid


sheeples and the latter because they see a way to make extra bucks.




Who is a stupid sheeple? Your buddy Herring, for one, who apparently


drives over to Wal-Mart every morning to see if he can buy five more


boxes of ammo.




If the DHS wants to buy a boatload of ammo over the next five years,


it


will contract directly with the manufacturers, and the manufacturers


who


get the contracts will ramp up production of the calibers the agency


wants. There is no shortage of ammo manufacturers willing to suck on


the


government's teat for five years.






----------------------------------




Heh. I just scolded him for the same thing. I think he reads the


headlines only, not the article.






It is embarrassing that Scotty even claims to have graduated from a

high

school in Connecticut.



=======================



What really surprises me is the number of reasonably well educated

people (meaning they should be able to read and comprehend) who share

Scott's paranoia regarding guns and ammo shortages. Not all, but

some people I talk to or meet when I go to the range talk the same

talk and some are lawyers or other educated professionals. There are

a few obvious "preppers" here and there, but not many. Most of the

conversations center on types of firearms, experiences with them,

likes and dislikes, etc., but I am still surprised at the number of

people who think the government is plotting to take away their right

to own a gun.


We went through all that when a previous Liberal Gov't brought in long arm registration a number of years ago. We already had fairly restrictive handgun controls.
People pointed to Australia.. claimed that the gov't was going to first force us to register and then take our firearms.
I registered and I still have my 20 ga shotgun and my 22 cal semi-auto rifle with 6x scope.
Our current Conservative govt just abolished the firearm registry last year.
Handguns are still heavily restricted, of course.


Why do you insist on owning girly stuff?
  #14   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,103
Default Here you go Dick...



"Hank©" wrote in message
eb.com...

On 3/29/2013 8:04 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/29/13 6:43 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
... you know guys, if you stop looking to Anderson Cooper and
Racheal
Maddcow for your news, you may even become an informed American
voter....

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...dhs-stocks-up/



Soooo, take a quick check and verify what I said earlier like Greg
usually does for me... I don't make this **** up, even if you don't
like
the way I present it.



You ignorant little ****, do you even read what you post before you
post
it and then claim "facts" not in play?

From your article:

Local law enforcement face ammo shortage as gun owners, DHS stock up

Published March 23, 2013

| FoxNews.com

Local law enforcement agencies across the country are facing an ammo
shortage, as gun owners concerned about new laws at the federal and
state level stock up on firearms and bullets.

At the same time, the Department of Homeland Security has said it
*wants* to buy more than 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition in the
next
four or five years -- which could put further strain on the supply.

The shortage, coupled with an increase in prices, comes as many gun
owners head to the stores in anticipation of new gun control laws.
States like Colorado and New York have already approved such
legislation, while Democrats move toward bringing a bill to the
Senate
floor. At the moment, the congressional bill does not include an
assault-weapons ban, but a ban is expected to be floated as an
amendment.

Still, what one official described as "panic-buying" set in, as
lawmakers rallied to draft new legislation in the wake of a series
of
tragic mass shootings last year, from Aurora, Colo., to Oak Creek,
Wis.,
to Newtown, Conn.

------

The shortage is being cause by "panic buying" by gun nuts, not by
mass
purchases of ammo by a federal agency.

There are dozens and dozens of calibers used in firearms and within
those categories of dozens of different varieties. DHS is only
intending
to buy ammo in a couple of these categories, and has no use for ammo
in
most of the calibers available.

Ammo *is* in short supply, an artificial situation caused by gun
owners
and ammo manufactuers, the former because they are just plain stupid
sheeples and the latter because they see a way to make extra bucks.

Who is a stupid sheeple? Your buddy Herring, for one, who apparently
drives over to Wal-Mart every morning to see if he can buy five more
boxes of ammo.

If the DHS wants to buy a boatload of ammo over the next five years,
it
will contract directly with the manufacturers, and the manufacturers
who
get the contracts will ramp up production of the calibers the agency
wants. There is no shortage of ammo manufacturers willing to suck on
the
government's teat for five years.






So you think it's stupid for citizens to stockpile ammo? How many
cases
are you storing?

--------------------------------------------

You didn't direct your question to me, but I'll throw in my 2 cents
worth:

Yes, I think it's stupid for private citizens to stockpile more ammo
than they reasonably need for home defense or as a hobby shooting at a
range.
Why? Because it's based on hysteria and only serves to create
shortages and drive the price of ammo up.

That said though, I also would not favor new laws restricting the
amount of ammo a private citizen can buy. If the preppers and
fanatics want to blow their money on ammo, it's their right.
Eventually, it will pass.

Realistically, the chances of needing a gun for personal/home defense
is very small and statistics prove that without a doubt. But,
there's always the possibility and I believe having a gun and knowing
how to use it to protect yourself or your family is prudent and
responsible. I also respect the opinion of those who don't want the
responsibility or just don't like guns. I never wanted one around
when we had kids in the house. But, now that I am older and the kids
are on their own, I felt it was an appropriate time to get a permit
and gun. Since then, I've discovered that I enjoy going to the range
with some friends once a week or so and becoming more proficient with
shooting.

The bulk of ammo used by private citizens are for hobby shooting at a
range or for hunting. A massive stockpile of ammo isn't needed those
activities or hobbies.

This shortage will pass once the hysteria being promoted by the
ultra-right media dies down.



  #15   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,605
Default Here you go Dick...

On 3/29/13 9:23 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"Hank©" wrote in message
eb.com...

On 3/29/2013 8:04 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/29/13 6:43 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
... you know guys, if you stop looking to Anderson Cooper and Racheal
Maddcow for your news, you may even become an informed American
voter....

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...dhs-stocks-up/




Soooo, take a quick check and verify what I said earlier like Greg
usually does for me... I don't make this **** up, even if you don't like
the way I present it.



You ignorant little ****, do you even read what you post before you post
it and then claim "facts" not in play?

From your article:

Local law enforcement face ammo shortage as gun owners, DHS stock up

Published March 23, 2013

| FoxNews.com

Local law enforcement agencies across the country are facing an ammo
shortage, as gun owners concerned about new laws at the federal and
state level stock up on firearms and bullets.

At the same time, the Department of Homeland Security has said it
*wants* to buy more than 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition in the next
four or five years -- which could put further strain on the supply.

The shortage, coupled with an increase in prices, comes as many gun
owners head to the stores in anticipation of new gun control laws.
States like Colorado and New York have already approved such
legislation, while Democrats move toward bringing a bill to the Senate
floor. At the moment, the congressional bill does not include an
assault-weapons ban, but a ban is expected to be floated as an amendment.

Still, what one official described as "panic-buying" set in, as
lawmakers rallied to draft new legislation in the wake of a series of
tragic mass shootings last year, from Aurora, Colo., to Oak Creek, Wis.,
to Newtown, Conn.

------

The shortage is being cause by "panic buying" by gun nuts, not by mass
purchases of ammo by a federal agency.

There are dozens and dozens of calibers used in firearms and within
those categories of dozens of different varieties. DHS is only intending
to buy ammo in a couple of these categories, and has no use for ammo in
most of the calibers available.

Ammo *is* in short supply, an artificial situation caused by gun owners
and ammo manufactuers, the former because they are just plain stupid
sheeples and the latter because they see a way to make extra bucks.

Who is a stupid sheeple? Your buddy Herring, for one, who apparently
drives over to Wal-Mart every morning to see if he can buy five more
boxes of ammo.

If the DHS wants to buy a boatload of ammo over the next five years, it
will contract directly with the manufacturers, and the manufacturers who
get the contracts will ramp up production of the calibers the agency
wants. There is no shortage of ammo manufacturers willing to suck on the
government's teat for five years.






So you think it's stupid for citizens to stockpile ammo? How many cases
are you storing?

--------------------------------------------

You didn't direct your question to me, but I'll throw in my 2 cents worth:

Yes, I think it's stupid for private citizens to stockpile more ammo
than they reasonably need for home defense or as a hobby shooting at a
range.
Why? Because it's based on hysteria and only serves to create
shortages and drive the price of ammo up.

That said though, I also would not favor new laws restricting the
amount of ammo a private citizen can buy. If the preppers and fanatics
want to blow their money on ammo, it's their right. Eventually, it will
pass.

Realistically, the chances of needing a gun for personal/home defense is
very small and statistics prove that without a doubt. But, there's
always the possibility and I believe having a gun and knowing how to use
it to protect yourself or your family is prudent and responsible. I
also respect the opinion of those who don't want the responsibility or
just don't like guns. I never wanted one around when we had kids in
the house. But, now that I am older and the kids are on their own, I
felt it was an appropriate time to get a permit and gun. Since then,
I've discovered that I enjoy going to the range with some friends once
a week or so and becoming more proficient with shooting.

The bulk of ammo used by private citizens are for hobby shooting at a
range or for hunting. A massive stockpile of ammo isn't needed those
activities or hobbies.

This shortage will pass once the hysteria being promoted by the
ultra-right media dies down.




I have enough ammo on hand for a few trips to a nearby outdoor range as
soon as the weather warms up. I don't like shooting outdoors in the
cold, and lately I've only been going to the indoor range about twice a
month. I much prefer outdoor ranges.

Typically, at the range, I'll shoot two boxes or 100 rounds of ball ammo
9mm, two boxes or 200 rounds of .22LR in my pistol, and two boxes or 200
rounds of .22LR in my rifle. I use inexpensive but clean ammo for
practicing at the range. I like Sellier and Bellot and CCI. I keep a 9mm
mag full of hollow point at home for defensive purposes, plus my 12 gauge.







  #16   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,069
Default Here you go Dick...

In article ,
says...

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
...

On 3/29/13 8:16 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
news
On 3/29/13 6:43 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
... you know guys, if you stop looking to Anderson Cooper and
Racheal
Maddcow for your news, you may even become an informed American
voter....

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...dhs-stocks-up/



Soooo, take a quick check and verify what I said earlier like Greg
usually does for me... I don't make this **** up, even if you don't
like
the way I present it.



You ignorant little ****, do you even read what you post before you
post
it and then claim "facts" not in play?

From your article:

Local law enforcement face ammo shortage as gun owners, DHS stock up

Published March 23, 2013

| FoxNews.com


Ammo *is* in short supply, an artificial situation caused by gun
owners
and ammo manufactuers, the former because they are just plain stupid
sheeples and the latter because they see a way to make extra bucks.

Who is a stupid sheeple? Your buddy Herring, for one, who apparently
drives over to Wal-Mart every morning to see if he can buy five more
boxes of ammo.

If the DHS wants to buy a boatload of ammo over the next five years,
it
will contract directly with the manufacturers, and the manufacturers
who
get the contracts will ramp up production of the calibers the agency
wants. There is no shortage of ammo manufacturers willing to suck on
the
government's teat for five years.


----------------------------------

Heh. I just scolded him for the same thing. I think he reads the
headlines only, not the article.


It is embarrassing that Scotty even claims to have graduated from a
high
school in Connecticut.

=======================

What really surprises me is the number of reasonably well educated
people (meaning they should be able to read and comprehend) who share
Scott's paranoia regarding guns and ammo shortages. Not all, but
some people I talk to or meet when I go to the range talk the same
talk and some are lawyers or other educated professionals. There are
a few obvious "preppers" here and there, but not many. Most of the
conversations center on types of firearms, experiences with them,
likes and dislikes, etc., but I am still surprised at the number of
people who think the government is plotting to take away their right
to own a gun.





Yes, look no further than here in rec.boats. There is one in particular
who never talked about guns before and now it's about his only
conversation here other than far right wing crapola.
  #17   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,069
Default Here you go Dick...

In article ,
says...

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
news
On 3/29/13 6:43 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
... you know guys, if you stop looking to Anderson Cooper and
Racheal
Maddcow for your news, you may even become an informed American
voter....

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...dhs-stocks-up/


Soooo, take a quick check and verify what I said earlier like Greg
usually does for me... I don't make this **** up, even if you don't
like
the way I present it.



You ignorant little ****, do you even read what you post before you
post
it and then claim "facts" not in play?

---------------------------------------------------------

Last week my favorite gun shop was totally sold out of .380 ammo and I
had used up almost all I had at the range. They said they had more
coming in this past Wednesday, so yesterday I stopped in to check.
They had some, but all they could get was premium "law enforcement"
hollowpoints at $39 for a box of 50.

So much for DHS buying up all the ammo and "causing" the shortage.


Eh, you're a smart man, you already knew that was insane bullcrap!

  #18   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,106
Default Here you go Dick...

On 3/29/2013 8:16 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
news
On 3/29/13 6:43 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
... you know guys, if you stop looking to Anderson Cooper and Racheal
Maddcow for your news, you may even become an informed American voter....

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...dhs-stocks-up/



Soooo, take a quick check and verify what I said earlier like Greg
usually does for me... I don't make this **** up, even if you don't like
the way I present it.



You ignorant little ****, do you even read what you post before you post
it and then claim "facts" not in play?

From your article:

Local law enforcement face ammo shortage as gun owners, DHS stock up

Published March 23, 2013

| FoxNews.com

Local law enforcement agencies across the country are facing an ammo
shortage, as gun owners concerned about new laws at the federal and
state level stock up on firearms and bullets.

At the same time, the Department of Homeland Security has said it
*wants* to buy more than 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition in the next
four or five years -- which could put further strain on the supply.

The shortage, coupled with an increase in prices, comes as many gun
owners head to the stores in anticipation of new gun control laws.
States like Colorado and New York have already approved such
legislation, while Democrats move toward bringing a bill to the Senate
floor. At the moment, the congressional bill does not include an
assault-weapons ban, but a ban is expected to be floated as an amendment.

Still, what one official described as "panic-buying" set in, as
lawmakers rallied to draft new legislation in the wake of a series of
tragic mass shootings last year, from Aurora, Colo., to Oak Creek, Wis.,
to Newtown, Conn.

------

The shortage is being cause by "panic buying" by gun nuts, not by mass
purchases of ammo by a federal agency.

There are dozens and dozens of calibers used in firearms and within
those categories of dozens of different varieties. DHS is only intending
to buy ammo in a couple of these categories, and has no use for ammo in
most of the calibers available.

Ammo *is* in short supply, an artificial situation caused by gun owners
and ammo manufactuers, the former because they are just plain stupid
sheeples and the latter because they see a way to make extra bucks.

Who is a stupid sheeple? Your buddy Herring, for one, who apparently
drives over to Wal-Mart every morning to see if he can buy five more
boxes of ammo.

If the DHS wants to buy a boatload of ammo over the next five years, it
will contract directly with the manufacturers, and the manufacturers who
get the contracts will ramp up production of the calibers the agency
wants. There is no shortage of ammo manufacturers willing to suck on the
government's teat for five years.


----------------------------------

Heh. I just scolded him for the same thing. I think he reads the
headlines only, not the article.





Schooled what? I said that they were buying up 1.6 billion rounds, you
challenged me, I put up the article....
  #19   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,106
Default Here you go Dick...

On 3/29/2013 8:41 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
...

On 3/29/13 8:16 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
news
On 3/29/13 6:43 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
... you know guys, if you stop looking to Anderson Cooper and Racheal
Maddcow for your news, you may even become an informed American
voter....

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...dhs-stocks-up/




Soooo, take a quick check and verify what I said earlier like Greg
usually does for me... I don't make this **** up, even if you don't like
the way I present it.



You ignorant little ****, do you even read what you post before you post
it and then claim "facts" not in play?

From your article:

Local law enforcement face ammo shortage as gun owners, DHS stock up

Published March 23, 2013

| FoxNews.com


Ammo *is* in short supply, an artificial situation caused by gun owners
and ammo manufactuers, the former because they are just plain stupid
sheeples and the latter because they see a way to make extra bucks.

Who is a stupid sheeple? Your buddy Herring, for one, who apparently
drives over to Wal-Mart every morning to see if he can buy five more
boxes of ammo.

If the DHS wants to buy a boatload of ammo over the next five years, it
will contract directly with the manufacturers, and the manufacturers who
get the contracts will ramp up production of the calibers the agency
wants. There is no shortage of ammo manufacturers willing to suck on the
government's teat for five years.


----------------------------------

Heh. I just scolded him for the same thing. I think he reads the
headlines only, not the article.


It is embarrassing that Scotty even claims to have graduated from a high
school in Connecticut.

=======================

What really surprises me is the number of reasonably well educated
people (meaning they should be able to read and comprehend) who share
Scott's paranoia regarding guns and ammo shortages. Not all, but some
people I talk to or meet when I go to the range talk the same talk and
some are lawyers or other educated professionals. There are a few
obvious "preppers" here and there, but not many. Most of the
conversations center on types of firearms, experiences with them, likes
and dislikes, etc., but I am still surprised at the number of people
who think the government is plotting to take away their right to own a gun.






What surprises me is you and harry not reading what I said.. But do ego
on...
  #20   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,106
Default Here you go Dick...

On 3/29/2013 8:27 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
news
On 3/29/13 6:43 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
... you know guys, if you stop looking to Anderson Cooper and Racheal
Maddcow for your news, you may even become an informed American voter....

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...dhs-stocks-up/



Soooo, take a quick check and verify what I said earlier like Greg
usually does for me... I don't make this **** up, even if you don't like
the way I present it.



You ignorant little ****, do you even read what you post before you post
it and then claim "facts" not in play?

---------------------------------------------------------

Last week my favorite gun shop was totally sold out of .380 ammo and I
had used up almost all I had at the range. They said they had more
coming in this past Wednesday, so yesterday I stopped in to check. They
had some, but all they could get was premium "law enforcement"
hollowpoints at $39 for a box of 50.

So much for DHS buying up all the ammo and "causing" the shortage.



Now you are starting to sound like Loogie.... later... Cause of course
you found some ammo and MSNBC said.... LOL....
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Better than a Deadly Dick Eisboch General 12 August 22nd 08 06:34 PM
OT-Dick gets an earfull... [email protected] ASA 11 December 10th 04 07:14 PM
An even larger dick! Poppa Pimple ASA 7 December 5th 03 04:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017