On 4/4/13 11:25 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 4/3/2013 10:48 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:19:08 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

Question for you - you must have missed it the first time:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while
aiming.

==========

I'd personally question whether or not Harry has *any* meaningful
exerience at a well run gun range. If he exhibited the kind of
behavior and attitude at my range that he exhibits here, he would have
been permanently banned from the property.


He has been kicked out of several gun groups, the last one we saw the
admin actually called him an "asshat"... LOL! He shoots illegally, on
others property from everything he has told us.

Cite? I didn't think so, just more lies from you.


Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion
board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to
background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for
first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking
the "boys" there were rational.

I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there
are fewer crazies there.

On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion
board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to
background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for
first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking
the "boys" there were rational.

I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there
are fewer crazies there.

Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion
groups. The Android forum is just one other example.

On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote:

On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion
board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to
background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for
first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking
the "boys" there were rational.

I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there
are fewer crazies there.

Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion
groups. The Android forum is just one other example.

I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being
pro safety training. What a crock.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

On 4/4/13 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote:

On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion
board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to
background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for
first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking
the "boys" there were rational.

I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there
are fewer crazies there.

Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion
groups. The Android forum is just one other example.

I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being
pro safety training. What a crock.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


And once again you prove you cannot comprehend what you read.

"I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun
purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers,
and I said so."

Apparently he who laughs last does laugh best. Some of the boys on that
Maryland gun discussion board must be having strokes over what is about
to happen in this state.

On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:56:38 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/4/13 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote:

On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion
board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to
background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for
first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking
the "boys" there were rational.

I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there
are fewer crazies there.

Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion
groups. The Android forum is just one other example.

I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being
pro safety training. What a crock.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


And once again you prove you cannot comprehend what you read.

"I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun
purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers,
and I said so."

Apparently he who laughs last does laugh best. Some of the boys on that
Maryland gun discussion board must be having strokes over what is about
to happen in this state.


What is the difference between 'lack of opposition' and 'not opposed'?

What is the difference between 'NOT opposed to...mandatory safety training' and 'being pro safety
training'?

Reading comprehension comments???

Tell us about those 'special circumstances', ESAD.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

On 4/4/13 1:04 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:56:38 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/4/13 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote:

On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion
board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to
background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for
first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking
the "boys" there were rational.

I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there
are fewer crazies there.

Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion
groups. The Android forum is just one other example.

I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being
pro safety training. What a crock.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


And once again you prove you cannot comprehend what you read.

"I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun
purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers,
and I said so."

Apparently he who laughs last does laugh best. Some of the boys on that
Maryland gun discussion board must be having strokes over what is about
to happen in this state.


What is the difference between 'lack of opposition' and 'not opposed'?

What is the difference between 'NOT opposed to...mandatory safety training' and 'being pro safety
training'?

Reading comprehension comments???

Tell us about those 'special circumstances', ESAD.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



The "I said so" part.

On 4/4/2013 12:56 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/4/13 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400,
wrote:

On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion
board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to
background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for
first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of
thinking
the "boys" there were rational.

I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there
are fewer crazies there.

Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion
groups. The Android forum is just one other example.

I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to
background checks and being
pro safety training. What a crock.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


And once again you prove you cannot comprehend what you read.

"I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun
purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers,
and I said so."

Apparently he who laughs last does laugh best. Some of the boys on that
Maryland gun discussion board must be having strokes over what is about
to happen in this state.



You are having trouble with reality. I can help you turn your life
around and discover why you can't get along with anyone. Send me an email

On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/4/13 11:25 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 4/3/2013 10:48 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:19:08 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

Question for you - you must have missed it the first time:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol
aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would
violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a
round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to
immediately take it off again while
aiming.

==========

I'd personally question whether or not Harry has *any* meaningful
exerience at a well run gun range. If he exhibited the kind of
behavior and attitude at my range that he exhibits here, he would have
been permanently banned from the property.


He has been kicked out of several gun groups, the last one we saw the
admin actually called him an "asshat"... LOL! He shoots illegally, on
others property from everything he has told us.

Cite? I didn't think so, just more lies from you.


Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion
board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to
background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for
first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking
the "boys" there were rational.

I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there
are fewer crazies there.

You got booted for political bull****. We all read the thread...

On 4/4/2013 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote:

On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion
board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to
background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for
first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking
the "boys" there were rational.

I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there
are fewer crazies there.

Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion
groups. The Android forum is just one other example.

I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being
pro safety training. What a crock.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


No, we all read the thread. He was over there trolling with his DNC
bull**** being his usual asshat...

On 4/4/2013 1:04 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:56:38 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/4/13 12:53 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote:

On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion
board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to
background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for
first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking
the "boys" there were rational.

I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there
are fewer crazies there.

Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion
groups. The Android forum is just one other example.

I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being
pro safety training. What a crock.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


And once again you prove you cannot comprehend what you read.

"I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to background checks on gun
purchasers and mandatory safety training for first time gun purchasers,
and I said so."

Apparently he who laughs last does laugh best. Some of the boys on that
Maryland gun discussion board must be having strokes over what is about
to happen in this state.


What is the difference between 'lack of opposition' and 'not opposed'?

What is the difference between 'NOT opposed to...mandatory safety training' and 'being pro safety
training'?

Reading comprehension comments???

Tell us about those 'special circumstances', ESAD.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


I'd be willing to help fix Harry for free, if he'd only give me the chance.