On 4/3/13 9:32 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:23:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:23 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

You stressed the importance of a safety over and over. You say the only time you use it is on the
range during the interval between chambering a round and shooting the round.

Unless you're not ready to shoot, why did you chamber the round?

If you are ready to shoot, why not shoot?

Your long winded explanations of 'conditions' didn't answer the question.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



snerk

*Among other reasons*, gotta be ready to shoot *instantly* in case some
crazed rightie with an assault rife wanders onto the range and starts
firing at everyone. If a round is chambered and the safety is on, all I
have to do is flip off the safety and fire. And until I fire and the
safety is on, the weapon is safer than your unsafe "trigger safety."

Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?

On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:39:09 -0400, Hank© wrote:

On 4/3/2013 9:23 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol
aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would
violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round,
it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to
immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

John's gun safety question got you stumped?

Well, given his comments it's a pretty hard question.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

In article ,
says...

On 4/3/13 9:32 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:23:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:23 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina?s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

You stressed the importance of a safety over and over. You say the only time you use it is on the
range during the interval between chambering a round and shooting the round.

Unless you're not ready to shoot, why did you chamber the round?

If you are ready to shoot, why not shoot?

Your long winded explanations of 'conditions' didn't answer the question.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



snerk

*Among other reasons*, gotta be ready to shoot *instantly* in case some
crazed rightie with an assault rife wanders onto the range and starts
firing at everyone. If a round is chambered and the safety is on, all I
have to do is flip off the safety and fire. And until I fire and the
safety is on, the weapon is safer than your unsafe "trigger safety."

Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?

Holy ****, Herring is going as bat**** crazy as Scotty!!!

On 4/3/2013 9:49 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/3/13 9:32 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:23:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:23 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol
aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would
violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a
round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to
immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

You stressed the importance of a safety over and over. You say the
only time you use it is on the
range during the interval between chambering a round and shooting the
round.

Unless you're not ready to shoot, why did you chamber the round?

If you are ready to shoot, why not shoot?

Your long winded explanations of 'conditions' didn't answer the question.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



snerk

*Among other reasons*, gotta be ready to shoot *instantly* in case some
crazed rightie with an assault rife wanders onto the range and starts
firing at everyone. If a round is chambered and the safety is on, all I
have to do is flip off the safety and fire. And until I fire and the
safety is on, the weapon is safer than your unsafe "trigger safety."

Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?




Gotta be ready to shoot instantly doesn't mean safety on, fella.
If you are gonna rag on John's guns, you better find out how they work,
before you SHOOT your mouth off.

On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:29:01 -0400, Hank© wrote:

On 4/3/2013 9:49 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/3/13 9:32 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:23:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:23 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol
aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would
violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a
round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to
immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

You stressed the importance of a safety over and over. You say the
only time you use it is on the
range during the interval between chambering a round and shooting the
round.

Unless you're not ready to shoot, why did you chamber the round?

If you are ready to shoot, why not shoot?

Your long winded explanations of 'conditions' didn't answer the question.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



snerk

*Among other reasons*, gotta be ready to shoot *instantly* in case some
crazed rightie with an assault rife wanders onto the range and starts
firing at everyone. If a round is chambered and the safety is on, all I
have to do is flip off the safety and fire. And until I fire and the
safety is on, the weapon is safer than your unsafe "trigger safety."

Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?




Gotta be ready to shoot instantly doesn't mean safety on, fella.
If you are gonna rag on John's guns, you better find out how they work,
before you SHOOT your mouth off.

He obviously realizes he made a fool of himself with his 'conditions' essay, stolen from the
Internet most likely. Perhaps he should have read it before hitting the 'post' button.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

On 4/3/2013 11:28 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:29:01 -0400, Hank© wrote:

On 4/3/2013 9:49 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/3/13 9:32 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:23:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:23 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol
aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would
violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a
round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to
immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

You stressed the importance of a safety over and over. You say the
only time you use it is on the
range during the interval between chambering a round and shooting the
round.

Unless you're not ready to shoot, why did you chamber the round?

If you are ready to shoot, why not shoot?

Your long winded explanations of 'conditions' didn't answer the question.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



snerk

*Among other reasons*, gotta be ready to shoot *instantly* in case some
crazed rightie with an assault rife wanders onto the range and starts
firing at everyone. If a round is chambered and the safety is on, all I
have to do is flip off the safety and fire. And until I fire and the
safety is on, the weapon is safer than your unsafe "trigger safety."

Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?




Gotta be ready to shoot instantly doesn't mean safety on, fella.
If you are gonna rag on John's guns, you better find out how they work,
before you SHOOT your mouth off.

He obviously realizes he made a fool of himself with his 'conditions' essay, stolen from the
Internet most likely. Perhaps he should have read it before hitting the 'post' button.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


He doesn't get it. He just plods along like a doofus.

J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:29:01 -0400, Hank© wrote:

On 4/3/2013 9:49 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/3/13 9:32 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:23:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:23 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
CarolinaÂ’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol
aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would
violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a
round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to
immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

You stressed the importance of a safety over and over. You say the
only time you use it is on the
range during the interval between chambering a round and shooting the
round.

Unless you're not ready to shoot, why did you chamber the round?

If you are ready to shoot, why not shoot?

Your long winded explanations of 'conditions' didn't answer the question.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



snerk

*Among other reasons*, gotta be ready to shoot *instantly* in case some
crazed rightie with an assault rife wanders onto the range and starts
firing at everyone. If a round is chambered and the safety is on, all I
have to do is flip off the safety and fire. And until I fire and the
safety is on, the weapon is safer than your unsafe "trigger safety."

Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?




Gotta be ready to shoot instantly doesn't mean safety on, fella.
If you are gonna rag on John's guns, you better find out how they work,
before you SHOOT your mouth off.

He obviously realizes he made a fool of himself with his 'conditions'
essay, stolen from the
Internet most likely. Perhaps he should have read it before hitting the 'post' button.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

snark. No, herring. I am simply not playing your game. You should move on,
polymer man.

On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:49:25 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:32 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:23:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:23 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
Carolina’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round, it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

You stressed the importance of a safety over and over. You say the only time you use it is on the
range during the interval between chambering a round and shooting the round.

Unless you're not ready to shoot, why did you chamber the round?

If you are ready to shoot, why not shoot?

Your long winded explanations of 'conditions' didn't answer the question.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



snerk

*Among other reasons*, gotta be ready to shoot *instantly* in case some
crazed rightie with an assault rife wanders onto the range and starts
firing at everyone. If a round is chambered and the safety is on, all I
have to do is flip off the safety and fire. And until I fire and the
safety is on, the weapon is safer than your unsafe "trigger safety."

From what you've said so far about your rationale for safeties, I doubt if you'd be able to find the
thumb safety so you could 'off' it. The P250, with a round in the chamber is capable of being shot
*instantly*.


Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?


Don't you mean to say, "...when *we* were making war...", ESAD?

I'm surprised to see that the reason safeties are so important to you is because the military uses
them. You should have just stated that up front, rather than attempt to impress everyone with your
bull**** rationale.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:49:25 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:32 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:23:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/3/13 9:23 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Former governor Mark Sanford won a Republican runoff election in South
CarolinaÂ’s 1st congressional district on Tuesday, advancing to a
head-to-head race against Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert Busch
that early indicators suggest will be competitive.

Yeah, but:

When you chamber a round at the range do you then put the pistol
aside, or stand around and shoot
the ****, such that you need to put the thumb safety on? That would
violate your first rule - not
ready to fire 'til you're ready to fire. If you've chambered a round,
it should be because you're
ready to fire - no need to put the safety on, other than to
immediately take it off again while
aiming.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



Yawn. Herring's got a new burr up his ass.

You stressed the importance of a safety over and over. You say the only
time you use it is on the
range during the interval between chambering a round and shooting the round.

Unless you're not ready to shoot, why did you chamber the round?

If you are ready to shoot, why not shoot?

Your long winded explanations of 'conditions' didn't answer the question.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



snerk

*Among other reasons*, gotta be ready to shoot *instantly* in case some
crazed rightie with an assault rife wanders onto the range and starts
firing at everyone. If a round is chambered and the safety is on, all I
have to do is flip off the safety and fire. And until I fire and the
safety is on, the weapon is safer than your unsafe "trigger safety."

From what you've said so far about your rationale for safeties, I doubt
if you'd be able to find the
thumb safety so you could 'off' it. The P250, with a round in the chamber
is capable of being shot
*instantly*.


Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?


Don't you mean to say, "...when *we* were making war...", ESAD?

I'm surprised to see that the reason safeties are so important to you is
because the military uses
them. You should have just stated that up front, rather than attempt to
impress everyone with your
bull**** rationale.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

As usual your thought processes aren't processing.

On 4/3/13 11:34 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:49:25 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Weren't you issued an M1911A1 when you were making war against the
Vietnamese? Didn't it have a safety? Weren't you told why? How about its
military replacement, the Beretta M9? Does it have thumb safeties, or is
it equipped with the non-safe "safe trigger," instead?


Don't you mean to say, "...when *we* were making war...", ESAD?

No, Herring, I didn't mean to say "we." You were in Vietnam, making war
against the Vietnamese. Killing Vietnamese was not the reason I was there.