On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:33:03 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Ayers was not even prosecuted for any criminal activities. He was,
obviously, deeply involved in efforts to force an end to our war against
the people of Vietnam.

He was charged with a number of crimes and was pursued by the FBI. He remained a fugitive for a period of time. Because of some illegal activities by the FBI while investigating, the charges were dropped.

Ayers was a domestic terrorist and has admitted it. He got off on a technicality. That doesn't change the facts.

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:44:09 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:33:03 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Ayers was not even prosecuted for any criminal activities. He was,
obviously, deeply involved in efforts to force an end to our war against
the people of Vietnam.

He was charged with a number of crimes and was pursued by the FBI. He remained a fugitive for a period of time. Because of some illegal activities by the FBI while investigating, the charges were dropped.

Ayers was a domestic terrorist and has admitted it. He got off on a technicality. That doesn't change the facts.

So, you don't believe in the rule of law. The FBI has a long history
of ****ing up investigations and acting illegally.

In article , says...

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:44:09 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:33:03 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Ayers was not even prosecuted for any criminal activities. He was,
obviously, deeply involved in efforts to force an end to our war against
the people of Vietnam.

He was charged with a number of crimes and was pursued by the FBI. He remained a fugitive for a period of time. Because of some illegal activities by the FBI while investigating, the charges were dropped.

Ayers was a domestic terrorist and has admitted it. He got off on a technicality. That doesn't change the facts.

So, you don't believe in the rule of law. The FBI has a long history
of ****ing up investigations and acting illegally

Just because he wasn't prosecuted due to a technicality doesn't mean he didn't do the crime.

Urin Asshole wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:44:09 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:33:03 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Ayers was not even prosecuted for any criminal activities. He was,
obviously, deeply involved in efforts to force an end to our war against
the people of Vietnam.

He was charged with a number of crimes and was pursued by the FBI. He
remained a fugitive for a period of time. Because of some illegal
activities by the FBI while investigating, the charges were dropped.

Ayers was a domestic terrorist and has admitted it. He got off on a
technicality. That doesn't change the facts.

So, you don't believe in the rule of law. The FBI has a long history
of ****ing up investigations and acting illegally.

Cheney and Rumsfeld were serious terrorists and they weren't prosecuted
either.

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 19:05:05 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , says...

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:44:09 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:33:03 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Ayers was not even prosecuted for any criminal activities. He was,
obviously, deeply involved in efforts to force an end to our war against
the people of Vietnam.

He was charged with a number of crimes and was pursued by the FBI. He remained a fugitive for a period of time. Because of some illegal activities by the FBI while investigating, the charges were dropped.

Ayers was a domestic terrorist and has admitted it. He got off on a technicality. That doesn't change the facts.

So, you don't believe in the rule of law. The FBI has a long history
of ****ing up investigations and acting illegally

Just because he wasn't prosecuted due to a technicality doesn't mean he didn't do the crime.

So do you or don't you believe in the rule of law? It's a simple
question.

And, AGAIN, this has nothing to do with the Boston Marathon. NOTHING.

On 17 Apr 2013 23:32:02 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Urin Asshole wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:44:09 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:33:03 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Ayers was not even prosecuted for any criminal activities. He was,
obviously, deeply involved in efforts to force an end to our war against
the people of Vietnam.

He was charged with a number of crimes and was pursued by the FBI. He
remained a fugitive for a period of time. Because of some illegal
activities by the FBI while investigating, the charges were dropped.

Ayers was a domestic terrorist and has admitted it. He got off on a
technicality. That doesn't change the facts.

So, you don't believe in the rule of law. The FBI has a long history
of ****ing up investigations and acting illegally.

Cheney and Rumsfeld were serious terrorists and they weren't prosecuted
either.

That's right. A recent report showed that we did torture after 9/11
and nothing at all was accomplished as far as intel goes. Cheney
should have been prosecuted. It's too bad that won't happen.

In article ,
says...

In article , says...

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:44:09 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:33:03 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Ayers was not even prosecuted for any criminal activities. He was,
obviously, deeply involved in efforts to force an end to our war against
the people of Vietnam.

He was charged with a number of crimes and was pursued by the FBI. He remained a fugitive for a period of time. Because of some illegal activities by the FBI while investigating, the charges were dropped.

Ayers was a domestic terrorist and has admitted it. He got off on a technicality. That doesn't change the facts.

So, you don't believe in the rule of law. The FBI has a long history
of ****ing up investigations and acting illegally

Just because he wasn't prosecuted due to a technicality doesn't mean he didn't do the crime.

That's the hard core right for you, screw the rule of law if it gets in
your way.

On 4/18/13 8:39 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

In article , says...

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:44:09 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:33:03 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Ayers was not even prosecuted for any criminal activities. He was,
obviously, deeply involved in efforts to force an end to our war against
the people of Vietnam.

He was charged with a number of crimes and was pursued by the FBI. He remained a fugitive for a period of time. Because of some illegal activities by the FBI while investigating, the charges were dropped.

Ayers was a domestic terrorist and has admitted it. He got off on a technicality. That doesn't change the facts.

So, you don't believe in the rule of law. The FBI has a long history
of ****ing up investigations and acting illegally

Just because he wasn't prosecuted due to a technicality doesn't mean he didn't do the crime.

That's the hard core right for you, screw the rule of law if it gets in
your way.


Cheney wasn't prosecuted, either, and there's no question he did the
crime(s).

On 4/18/2013 8:40 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:



The shooting at Ft. Hood was classified as workplace violence, which is
what it was. Terrorism usually is reserved for large-scale acts of
violence that target non-combatant civilians.



You are a ****ing idiot... to call you retarded would be an insult to
the mentally challenged. It targeted civilians as well as soldiers, and
the asshole ran around screaming his Islamic rants while he was
shooting... He was a terrorist, he should be at Gitmo, period...

On 4/18/2013 8:41 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:



Cheney wasn't prosecuted, either, and there's no question he did the
crime(s).

For you maybe, but you are not a "reasonable person"...