Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Has anyone attempted to connect their GPS unit to more than one
"listener", e.g. DCS radio, autopilot, laptop, radar, etc? If so, how was it done? With hardware "expander"? Interested in any experiences. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Check out the seatalk module
http://www.marinecomputing.com/products/nmeaseatalk/ This will get you started. Shane. "Steve Zweigart" wrote in message ... Has anyone attempted to connect their GPS unit to more than one "listener", e.g. DCS radio, autopilot, laptop, radar, etc? If so, how was it done? With hardware "expander"? Interested in any experiences. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steve Zweigart" wrote in message
... Has anyone attempted to connect their GPS unit to more than one "listener", e.g. DCS radio, autopilot, laptop, radar, etc? If so, how was it done? With hardware "expander"? Interested in any experiences. According to the NMEA standard, every talker (GPS) should be able to drive up to four listeners. It is perfectly safe to feed the GPS output to more than one input. The worst thing that could happen is that at a certain number of listeners, the signal is loaded too much. But you won't break anything. So just try it. Meindert |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks!!! That's exactly the kind of info I was after!
Meindert Sprang wrote: "Steve Zweigart" wrote in message ... Has anyone attempted to connect their GPS unit to more than one "listener", e.g. DCS radio, autopilot, laptop, radar, etc? If so, how was it done? With hardware "expander"? Interested in any experiences. According to the NMEA standard, every talker (GPS) should be able to drive up to four listeners. It is perfectly safe to feed the GPS output to more than one input. The worst thing that could happen is that at a certain number of listeners, the signal is loaded too much. But you won't break anything. So just try it. Meindert |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's $250 US for a box with some connectors all wirenutted together
inside. "Optically isolated" means you can't see the wirenuts! There must be a less expensive way... Padeen "Shane Child" wrote in message ... Check out the seatalk module http://www.marinecomputing.com/products/nmeaseatalk/ This will get you started. Shane. "Steve Zweigart" wrote in message ... Has anyone attempted to connect their GPS unit to more than one "listener", e.g. DCS radio, autopilot, laptop, radar, etc? If so, how was it done? With hardware "expander"? Interested in any experiences. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"padeen" wrote in message
... That's $250 US for a box with some connectors all wirenutted together inside. "Optically isolated" means you can't see the wirenuts! There must be a less expensive way... Well, an expander is bit more complicated than just a 'junction box'. It contains an opto-coupler wich takes care of the optical- or galvanical isolation. Next, there are a few buffers to give each output enough power to drive the required four listeners per output. And then the power supply, this might vary from a simple three-terminal regulator to a more expensice DC/DC converter (also isolated). Put this on a PCB, stuff it in a box, add the usual markups and there you are at a pricelevel of around $150. So indeed, $250 is a bit over the top. Meindert |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the explanation, Meindert. You've allayed my suspicions 1/2 way.
Padeen "Meindert Sprang" wrote in message ... "padeen" wrote in message ... That's $250 US for a box with some connectors all wirenutted together inside. "Optically isolated" means you can't see the wirenuts! There must be a less expensive way... Well, an expander is bit more complicated than just a 'junction box'. It contains an opto-coupler wich takes care of the optical- or galvanical isolation. Next, there are a few buffers to give each output enough power to drive the required four listeners per output. And then the power supply, this might vary from a simple three-terminal regulator to a more expensice DC/DC converter (also isolated). Put this on a PCB, stuff it in a box, add the usual markups and there you are at a pricelevel of around $150. So indeed, $250 is a bit over the top. Meindert |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
To take this thread a step further, in my "junkbox" are two Delorme
Earthmate GPS receivers formerly used with laptop computers. For some reason, the output from these units does not convey location information to my radio. (I have not yet tried it with the autotiller.) My guess is that there's a baud rate problem. I'm not aware of adjustable settings on the units, which are said to be NMEA compliant, but it seems that there MUST be a way to switch from RS-232 to RS-422 in order to utilize the NMEA output feature. I've found Delomre tech support to be of absolutely no help with off-the-wall questions like this. padeen wrote: Thanks for the explanation, Meindert. You've allayed my suspicions 1/2 way. Padeen "Meindert Sprang" wrote in message ... "padeen" wrote in message ... That's $250 US for a box with some connectors all wirenutted together inside. "Optically isolated" means you can't see the wirenuts! There must be a less expensive way... Well, an expander is bit more complicated than just a 'junction box'. It contains an opto-coupler wich takes care of the optical- or galvanical isolation. Next, there are a few buffers to give each output enough power to drive the required four listeners per output. And then the power supply, this might vary from a simple three-terminal regulator to a more expensice DC/DC converter (also isolated). Put this on a PCB, stuff it in a box, add the usual markups and there you are at a pricelevel of around $150. So indeed, $250 is a bit over the top. Meindert |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steve Zweigart" wrote in message
... To take this thread a step further, in my "junkbox" are two Delorme Earthmate GPS receivers formerly used with laptop computers. For some reason, the output from these units does not convey location information to my radio. (I have not yet tried it with the autotiller.) My guess is that there's a baud rate problem. I'm not aware of adjustable settings on the units, which are said to be NMEA compliant, but it seems that there MUST be a way to switch from RS-232 to RS-422 in order to utilize the NMEA output feature. This could indeed be caused by incompatibility between RS-232 and RS-422 levels, not to mention the fact that RS-232 is 'single ended' and RS-422 is differential. If you want an explanation about connecting differential and single ended devices, download a manual of my NMEA multiplexers. It contains a page with drawings about how to connect devices with eachother. You can find it on http://www.shipmodul.com/datasheets/man_mpx-41_en.pdf Look at page 3. Meindert |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Save your Win 3.1 notebook for NMEA testing..... | Electronics | |||
Before you connect new NMEA and blow your network.... | Cruising | |||
Before you connect new NMEA and blow your network.... | Electronics | |||
NMEA Noise in SSB | Electronics | |||
Transmitting different versions of NMEA data | Electronics |