....is on the U.S. House Intelligence Committee:

http://tinyurl.com/pt6g4xx

On Monday, July 15, 2013 2:06:42 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...is on the U.S. House Intelligence Committee:



http://tinyurl.com/pt6g4xx

Oh well, this one was on a House hearing committee

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqjFBiPMmBE

So... what's the big deal?

On 7/15/13 6:48 PM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 2:06:42 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...is on the U.S. House Intelligence Committee:



http://tinyurl.com/pt6g4xx

Oh well, this one was on a House hearing committee

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqjFBiPMmBE

So... what's the big deal?



Right, because nationalizing the oil industry would be worse than what
we have now, just like it is in Norway and other Scandinavian countries.

On Monday, July 15, 2013 5:53:31 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/15/13 6:48 PM, Tim wrote:

On Monday, July 15, 2013 2:06:42 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

...is on the U.S. House Intelligence Committee:







http://tinyurl.com/pt6g4xx



Oh well, this one was on a House hearing committee



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqjFBiPMmBE



So... what's the big deal?







Right, because nationalizing the oil industry would be worse than what

we have now, just like it is in Norway and other Scandinavian countries.

Sure would, then we'd get to pay 3 or 4 times what we're paying now for fuel.

On Monday, July 15, 2013 7:50:21 PM UTC-4, Tim wrote:
On Monday, July 15, 2013 5:53:31 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

On 7/15/13 6:48 PM, Tim wrote:



On Monday, July 15, 2013 2:06:42 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:



...is on the U.S. House Intelligence Committee:















http://tinyurl.com/pt6g4xx







Oh well, this one was on a House hearing committee







https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqjFBiPMmBE







So... what's the big deal?















Right, because nationalizing the oil industry would be worse than what



we have now, just like it is in Norway and other Scandinavian countries.



Sure would, then we'd get to pay 3 or 4 times what we're paying now for fuel.

You're already getting a deal, quit the ****ing whining....

On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:50:21 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:

On Monday, July 15, 2013 5:53:31 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/15/13 6:48 PM, Tim wrote:

On Monday, July 15, 2013 2:06:42 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

...is on the U.S. House Intelligence Committee:







http://tinyurl.com/pt6g4xx



Oh well, this one was on a House hearing committee



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqjFBiPMmBE



So... what's the big deal?







Right, because nationalizing the oil industry would be worse than what

we have now, just like it is in Norway and other Scandinavian countries.

Sure would, then we'd get to pay 3 or 4 times what we're paying now for fuel.

When I rode the Guzzi to Sweden, it cost almost $40 to fill my 5+ gallon tank. I'm sure it's much
higher now. That was about 1989

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:22:13 -0400, Hank©
wrote:

I am slowly converting to electric vehicles. I have 4 of them now.

=====

Just got my electric bicycle. It's very cool and a real conversation
piece. Unfortunately my wife has yet to see the beauty of it but
think she'll like it if she tries.

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:11:06 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

Harry mentioned reports, not evidence. I wouldn't consider anything he
writes or links to, credible, entertaining, or main stream.


That's because there is no evidence.. Just "Al Gore" style hype and
group think social requirements...

Who told you there was no proof, FOX?

http://tinyurl.com/llawpw3

=======

"Stuart H. Smith is an attorney based in New Orleans fighting major
oil companies and other polluters" - See more at:
http://www.stuarthsmith.com/more-pro....JpHQbjbJ.dpuf

That sure does sound like a reliable scientific, unbiased source. Not.

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:35:27 -0400, John H
wrote:

When I rode the Guzzi to Sweden...

====

Sounds like a rough, wet ride to me.

On 7/16/2013 9:25 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:11:06 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

Harry mentioned reports, not evidence. I wouldn't consider anything he
writes or links to, credible, entertaining, or main stream.


That's because there is no evidence.. Just "Al Gore" style hype and
group think social requirements...

Who told you there was no proof, FOX?

http://tinyurl.com/llawpw3

=======

"Stuart H. Smith is an attorney based in New Orleans fighting major
oil companies and other polluters" - See more at:
http://www.stuarthsmith.com/more-pro....JpHQbjbJ.dpuf

That sure does sound like a reliable scientific, unbiased source. Not.


What, you don't trust bloggers?