On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:10:42 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 7/16/13 4:07 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/16/2013 12:52 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that
Martin attacked Zimmerman.


Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one
who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism,
sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else
would you expect?


Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder"
someone.
Your argument simply does not wash.


I don't do guns (much but I feel there are three kinds of gun
owners... Hobbyists, folks who want to preserve general society, and
folks who want to get away with being assholes...

How does a gun "preserve general society"?


By shooting black kids carrying bags of candy while walking through your
neighborhood

The camaraderie between you two is a beautiful thing to behold.

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!

In article , says...

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
...

On 7/15/13 6:31 PM, Eisboch wrote:


You think Martin Bashir is a "mainstream" journalist?

Thanks for the laugh.



He spent years as a newsman for the BBC and for ABC, and hosted
Nightline for a while. That's all pretty mainsteam.

---------------------------------

I guess it all depends on one's point of reference.

Personally, I'd like to see Bashir and Piers Morgan deported back to
the mother country.

I agree on both counts. Come to this country, then tell everyone
what's
wrong with this country!!!

--------------------------------------------

Morgan does more than just complain about what's wrong with the USA.
He has become a loud activist for banning the private ownership of
handguns and rudely interrupts or talks over anyone who disagrees with
him. I can't understand why CNN pays him the big bucks for this
unless is purely from a standpoint of ratings.

Bashir is similar in his bashing of American culture and laws. He
also talks over his guests if they don't share his viewpoints. I
find it very difficult to listen to either which is too bad because if
they were more considerate and polite to their guests, I'd probably
at listen to them even if I didn't agree with them.

Both expel a "I am superior to all" attitude.

Yet the have to come to the US of A to earn a big fat paycheck. The only fitting description
is whores.

On 7/16/2013 5:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:07:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 7/16/2013 12:52 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that
Martin attacked Zimmerman.


Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one
who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism,
sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else
would you expect?


Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder"
someone.
Your argument simply does not wash.


I don't do guns (much but I feel there are three kinds of gun
owners... Hobbyists, folks who want to preserve general society, and
folks who want to get away with being assholes...

How does a gun "preserve general society"?

Ask Adolf.

John (Gun Nut) H.


Seriously, do I have to explain what I meant?

In article ,
says...

On 7/16/2013 5:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:07:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 7/16/2013 12:52 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that
Martin attacked Zimmerman.


Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one
who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism,
sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else
would you expect?


Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder"
someone.
Your argument simply does not wash.


I don't do guns (much but I feel there are three kinds of gun
owners... Hobbyists, folks who want to preserve general society, and
folks who want to get away with being assholes...

How does a gun "preserve general society"?

Ask Adolf.

John (Gun Nut) H.


Seriously, do I have to explain what I meant?

Yes, please do, insane one.

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:11:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 7/16/13 12:52 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that
Martin attacked Zimmerman.


Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one
who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism,
sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else
would you expect?


Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder"
someone.
Your argument simply does not wash


I wasn't patrolling anyone's neighborhood, looking for someone to stalk,
confront and shoot. Zimmerman was.

If that was his intent, why did he call the cops and why didn't he
simply confront Martin right away when he had the tactical advantage
of knowing where he was.?

It's called CYA.

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:05:37 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:03:20 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:


What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that
Martin attacked Zimmerman.

cite?

Why don't you track down that juror interview and listen yourself.

That's not true. Show me.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/15/justic...man-juror-book

"I think George got in a little bit too deep, which he shouldn't have
been there. But Trayvon decided that he wasn't going to let him scare
him ... and I think Trayvon got mad and attacked him," she said.

Uh, YOU said "they ALL agreed that Martin attacked Zimmerman". Not one,
ALL.... Notice if you will, the lady specifically said "*I* think".

On 7/17/2013 1:43 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:11:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 7/16/13 12:52 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that
Martin attacked Zimmerman.


Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one
who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism,
sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else
would you expect?


Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder"
someone.
Your argument simply does not wash


I wasn't patrolling anyone's neighborhood, looking for someone to stalk,
confront and shoot. Zimmerman was.

If that was his intent, why did he call the cops and why didn't he
simply confront Martin right away when he had the tactical advantage
of knowing where he was.?

Harry did patrol Baltimore harbor with sole the intention of stalking
and shooting one of our former lady contributors. Baltimore is quite a
distance from his normal stomping grounds, I might add.

In article ,
says...

In article , says...

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
...

On 7/15/13 6:31 PM, Eisboch wrote:


You think Martin Bashir is a "mainstream" journalist?

Thanks for the laugh.



He spent years as a newsman for the BBC and for ABC, and hosted
Nightline for a while. That's all pretty mainsteam.

---------------------------------

I guess it all depends on one's point of reference.

Personally, I'd like to see Bashir and Piers Morgan deported back to
the mother country.

I agree on both counts. Come to this country, then tell everyone
what's
wrong with this country!!!

--------------------------------------------

Morgan does more than just complain about what's wrong with the USA.
He has become a loud activist for banning the private ownership of
handguns and rudely interrupts or talks over anyone who disagrees with
him. I can't understand why CNN pays him the big bucks for this
unless is purely from a standpoint of ratings.

Bashir is similar in his bashing of American culture and laws. He
also talks over his guests if they don't share his viewpoints. I
find it very difficult to listen to either which is too bad because if
they were more considerate and polite to their guests, I'd probably
at listen to them even if I didn't agree with them.

Both expel a "I am superior to all" attitude.

Yet the have to come to the US of A to earn a big fat paycheck. The only fitting description
is whores.

Yes, that Stuart Varney sure is a whore.

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 21:11:11 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

On 7/16/2013 5:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:07:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 7/16/2013 12:52 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that
Martin attacked Zimmerman.


Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one
who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism,
sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else
would you expect?


Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder"
someone.
Your argument simply does not wash.


I don't do guns (much but I feel there are three kinds of gun
owners... Hobbyists, folks who want to preserve general society, and
folks who want to get away with being assholes...

How does a gun "preserve general society"?

Ask Adolf.

John (Gun Nut) H.


Seriously, do I have to explain what I meant?

Did you ask how a gun preserves general society? I thought that was from Loogy. I figured you had
more sense than to ask the question.

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!

On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:23:29 -0400, Hank© wrote:

On 7/17/2013 1:43 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:11:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 7/16/13 12:52 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:52:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


What was the verdict? Did you hear the juror? They all agreed that
Martin attacked Zimmerman.


Which proves not a thing, other than a jury of five white people and one
who wasn't, and living in a "cracker" town with a history of racism,
sanctioned the murder of a black kid. But this is America...what else
would you expect?


Yet you felt obligated to arm yourself and potentially "murder"
someone.
Your argument simply does not wash


I wasn't patrolling anyone's neighborhood, looking for someone to stalk,
confront and shoot. Zimmerman was.

If that was his intent, why did he call the cops and why didn't he
simply confront Martin right away when he had the tactical advantage
of knowing where he was.?

Harry did patrol Baltimore harbor with sole the intention of stalking
and shooting one of our former lady contributors. Baltimore is quite a
distance from his normal stomping grounds, I might add.

I remember that.

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!