....restrict reproductive rights, scrap Planned Parenthood, close health
clinics that provide important services to women, force medical
professionals to lie to women, force women to undergo medically
unnecessary exams for political reasons, spew inexplicable rhetoric on
rape, oppose pay equity laws, and push antiquated views on gender
roles... *is* a war on women.

On Friday, July 26, 2013 1:31:43 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...restrict reproductive rights, scrap Planned Parenthood, close health

clinics that provide important services to women, force medical

professionals to lie to women, force women to undergo medically

unnecessary exams for political reasons, spew inexplicable rhetoric on

rape, oppose pay equity laws, and push antiquated views on gender

roles... *is* a war on women.

Trying to pick a fight with the 'righties' again, Harry?

On 7/27/2013 6:58 AM, Tim wrote:
On Friday, July 26, 2013 1:31:43 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...restrict reproductive rights, scrap Planned Parenthood, close health

clinics that provide important services to women, force medical

professionals to lie to women, force women to undergo medically

unnecessary exams for political reasons, spew inexplicable rhetoric on

rape, oppose pay equity laws, and push antiquated views on gender

roles... *is* a war on women.

Trying to pick a fight with the 'righties' again, Harry?


He's just following his marching orders.

On 7/27/13 6:58 AM, Tim wrote:
On Friday, July 26, 2013 1:31:43 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...restrict reproductive rights, scrap Planned Parenthood, close health

clinics that provide important services to women, force medical

professionals to lie to women, force women to undergo medically

unnecessary exams for political reasons, spew inexplicable rhetoric on

rape, oppose pay equity laws, and push antiquated views on gender

roles... *is* a war on women.

Trying to pick a fight with the 'righties' again, Harry?



Not me. I'm just pointing out the truth of the Republican-Conservative
war against women. It's important to keep the war against women in the
forefront of discussions, in order to help defeat the
Republican-Conservative pigs in upcoming elections, at least in those
places where they haven't gerrymandered themselves into perpetual victory.

You never know if the wife of some Republican-Conservative pig poster
here might pressure her hubby into voting more intelligently.

On 7/27/2013 11:34 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 07:39:37 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 7/27/13 6:58 AM, Tim wrote:
On Friday, July 26, 2013 1:31:43 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...restrict reproductive rights, scrap Planned Parenthood, close health

clinics that provide important services to women, force medical

professionals to lie to women, force women to undergo medically

unnecessary exams for political reasons, spew inexplicable rhetoric on

rape, oppose pay equity laws, and push antiquated views on gender

roles... *is* a war on women.

Trying to pick a fight with the 'righties' again, Harry?



Not me. I'm just pointing out the truth of the Republican-Conservative
war against women. It's important to keep the war against women in the
forefront of discussions, in order to help defeat the
Republican-Conservative pigs in upcoming elections, at least in those
places where they haven't gerrymandered themselves into perpetual victory.

You never know if the wife of some Republican-Conservative pig poster
here might pressure her hubby into voting more intelligently.

There are plenty of conservative women who agree with these dumb
policies. That is how the politicians get elected.


If you look at any logical criteria, democrats have a "war on women" and
in true democratic style, that of course is what they blame on the
right. Remember the "vast right wing conspiracy", how did that turn
out, Anyway, with wanting women to be forced into substandard back
rooms like they are trying to do in Texas, that is a war. Why if they
care about women won't they allow rules that protect them with adequate
health care which is after all what the Texas law is really about?

In article ,
says...

On 7/27/2013 11:34 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 07:39:37 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 7/27/13 6:58 AM, Tim wrote:
On Friday, July 26, 2013 1:31:43 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...restrict reproductive rights, scrap Planned Parenthood, close health

clinics that provide important services to women, force medical

professionals to lie to women, force women to undergo medically

unnecessary exams for political reasons, spew inexplicable rhetoric on

rape, oppose pay equity laws, and push antiquated views on gender

roles... *is* a war on women.

Trying to pick a fight with the 'righties' again, Harry?



Not me. I'm just pointing out the truth of the Republican-Conservative
war against women. It's important to keep the war against women in the
forefront of discussions, in order to help defeat the
Republican-Conservative pigs in upcoming elections, at least in those
places where they haven't gerrymandered themselves into perpetual victory.

You never know if the wife of some Republican-Conservative pig poster
here might pressure her hubby into voting more intelligently.

There are plenty of conservative women who agree with these dumb
policies. That is how the politicians get elected.


If you look at any logical criteria, democrats have a "war on women" and
in true democratic style, that of course is what they blame on the
right. Remember the "vast right wing conspiracy", how did that turn
out, Anyway, with wanting women to be forced into substandard back
rooms like they are trying to do in Texas, that is a war. Why if they
care about women won't they allow rules that protect them with adequate
health care which is after all what the Texas law is really about?

What the Texas law "is really about" is the right telling women what
they can and can't do with their own bodies.

On 7/27/13 12:09 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 7/27/2013 11:34 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 07:39:37 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 7/27/13 6:58 AM, Tim wrote:
On Friday, July 26, 2013 1:31:43 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...restrict reproductive rights, scrap Planned Parenthood, close
health

clinics that provide important services to women, force medical

professionals to lie to women, force women to undergo medically

unnecessary exams for political reasons, spew inexplicable rhetoric on

rape, oppose pay equity laws, and push antiquated views on gender

roles... *is* a war on women.

Trying to pick a fight with the 'righties' again, Harry?



Not me. I'm just pointing out the truth of the Republican-Conservative
war against women. It's important to keep the war against women in the
forefront of discussions, in order to help defeat the
Republican-Conservative pigs in upcoming elections, at least in those
places where they haven't gerrymandered themselves into perpetual
victory.

You never know if the wife of some Republican-Conservative pig poster
here might pressure her hubby into voting more intelligently.

There are plenty of conservative women who agree with these dumb
policies. That is how the politicians get elected.


If you look at any logical criteria, democrats have a "war on women" and
in true democratic style, that of course is what they blame on the
right. Remember the "vast right wing conspiracy", how did that turn
out, Anyway, with wanting women to be forced into substandard back
rooms like they are trying to do in Texas, that is a war. Why if they
care about women won't they allow rules that protect them with adequate
health care which is after all what the Texas law is really about?


I was wondering if there was a naive moron in the United States who
thought what the right-wing political taliban did in Texas was to
"protect women."

Well, I have my answer.

The Texas law has nothing to do with protecting adequate health care for
women and everything to do with curtailing the availability of safe
abortions for women.

There still will be abortions in Texas outside of the one or two places
where they are now allowed. But they won't be safe abortions. Perhaps
you and a few of your ignorant right wing morons could sell coat hangers.