![]() |
Do I need this?
On Tuesday, August 27, 2013 7:40:54 PM UTC-5, F. O. A. D. wrote:
Tim wrote: On Tuesday, August 27, 2013 7:11:22 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: ... A sign from that mysterious imaginary being of mythology and superstition ... Which one? All of them. Then why didn't you say something to the effect of- " ... 'sign[s] from 'those' imaginary being[s]...?" |
Do I need this?
On 8/28/13 8:21 PM, Tim wrote:
On Tuesday, August 27, 2013 7:40:54 PM UTC-5, F. O. A. D. wrote: Tim wrote: On Tuesday, August 27, 2013 7:11:22 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: ... A sign from that mysterious imaginary being of mythology and superstition ... Which one? All of them. Then why didn't you say something to the effect of- " ... 'sign[s] from 'those' imaginary being[s]...?" Tim, I'm not writing garden-path sentences. The imaginary being(s) are all part of the conceptions of a god, the god, gods, whatever, all part of the same sort of superstition. |
Do I need this?
On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 7:36:48 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 8/28/13 8:21 PM, Tim wrote: On Tuesday, August 27, 2013 7:40:54 PM UTC-5, F. O. A. D. wrote: Tim wrote: On Tuesday, August 27, 2013 7:11:22 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: ... A sign from that mysterious imaginary being of mythology and superstition ... Which one? All of them. Then why didn't you say something to the effect of- " ... 'sign[s] from 'those' imaginary being[s]...?" Tim, I'm not writing garden-path sentences. The imaginary being(s) are all part of the conceptions of a god, the god, gods, whatever, all part of the same sort of superstition. But still, it doesn't make sense at least to me why you'd write singular then plural- back and forth etc. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com