Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,868
Default Do I need this?

In article , says...

Beautiful gun. Nice price.

http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5

John (Gun Nut) H.


My birthday is next week!
  #32   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,868
Default Do I need this?

In article , says...

On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:59:27 -0400, John H
wrote:

Beautiful gun. Nice price.

http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5

John (Gun Nut) H.


That is a lot of gun to carry.
Kimber does make a nice mini 9mm that my neighbor has. It is $1500 or
so.


I am looking at a couple of Sig's, P239 and P938, a Beretta Nano and the gun I have always
wanted a Colt Mustang .380.
  #33   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,069
Default Do I need this?

In article ,
says...

Beautiful gun. Nice price.

http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5

John (Gun Nut) H.


Yes, of course you do. Have to protect yourself against all of those
that you show hatred and bigotry for.
  #35   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,069
Default Do I need this?

In article ,
says...

On 8/22/2013 8:03 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
...

On 8/22/13 7:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"Tim" wrote in message
...

On Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:59:27 PM UTC-5, John H wrote:
Beautiful gun. Nice price.



http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5



John (Gun Nut) H.


For that price?

YES!

----------------------------

I really like some of the Kimber handguns although I've never fired
one. Unfortunately, the people's republic of Massachusetts has
determined that none of Kimber's models are worthy of being determined
to be MA compliant and it's therefore not possible for to buy one, new
or used.

Meanwhile, mini-me (Patrick Duval, Governor) has sponsored proposed
legislation to further limit what may be owned or done in MA with regard
to firearms. Included in the proposed changes to MA General Laws a

1. Limit of one firearm purchase per resident, per month. The
purchase of more than one firearm within a 30 day period will be a
felony,
punishable by 2.5 years in prison for the buyer.

2. Previously grandfathered magazine clips that hold 11 or more rounds
(standard Glock mag) must be legally disposed of within one year.
Only 7 round magazines will be permitted.

3. Require gun license applicants to disclose their mental health
histories.

4. Prohibit assault style firearms from being stored in homes.

5. Ban all high-capacity ammunition magazines, grandfathered or new,
including .22lr.

6. Require gun owners to purchase liability insurance.

7. Tighten access to high-powered rounds of ammunition. (whatever
*that* means).

8. Mandate buyers to undergo background checks before purchasing weapons
at gun shows.

9. Require private gun sales to occur at the business of a licensed
dealer so that the sale can be tracked electronically.

10. Several more that create more "crimes" for owning a prohibited
gun, prohibited magazine, prohibited kind of ammo, and anything
else they can dream up and get passed.

Status:

The bill was filed in February, 2013 and is currently making the rounds
through the various required hearings before going to the capital for a
vote.




Sounds pretty good to me.

---------------------

Of course.

I can understand the reasoning of some, but not all of the proposed law
changes.

To my knowledge, MA would be the first state to require liability
insurance to own a firearm, if approved. Doesn't make sense to me. How
does having liability insurance make gun ownership safer to the general
public? Basically, it says, "If I am negligent and you get hurt or
killed, don't worry ... I am insured."


It is just another way to tax and track your guns...

Some of the others are just plain dumb and for effect only. Private
sales are already required to be electronically filed here. You do it
on-line and the state has a record of the transaction. Why do we now
have to pay a fee to a licensed dealer to record a private sale?

What set this off in my mind was doing some research for a friend of
mine. His wife just purchased a pre-ban Clock. Came with two, eleven
round magazines. Under the proposed legislation, pre-ban mags of 10
rounds or less will be allowed. Post ban magazines are currently
limited to seven rounds. If approved, she is legally obligated to
transfer her 11 round mags out of state or prove that they have been
destroyed by some form of not yet disclosed procedure.







Better pull that tinfoil hate tighter around your head...... Jawbone
Scotty, the insane paranoid fool of rec.boats.


  #36   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,756
Default Do I need this?

Isn't that sweet, L'il Snottie coming to the aid of Idiot Snottie.
  #37   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,069
Default Do I need this?

In article ,
says...

On 8/22/2013 7:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"Tim" wrote in message
...

On Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:59:27 PM UTC-5, John H wrote:
Beautiful gun. Nice price.



http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5



John (Gun Nut) H.


For that price?

YES!

----------------------------

I really like some of the Kimber handguns although I've never fired
one. Unfortunately, the people's republic of Massachusetts has
determined that none of Kimber's models are worthy of being determined
to be MA compliant and it's therefore not possible for to buy one, new
or used.

Meanwhile, mini-me (Patrick Duval, Governor) has sponsored proposed
legislation to further limit what may be owned or done in MA with regard
to firearms. Included in the proposed changes to MA General Laws a

1. Limit of one firearm purchase per resident, per month. The
purchase of more than one firearm within a 30 day period will be a felony,
punishable by 2.5 years in prison for the buyer.

2. Previously grandfathered magazine clips that hold 11 or more rounds
(standard Glock mag) must be legally disposed of within one year.
Only 7 round magazines will be permitted.

3. Require gun license applicants to disclose their mental health
histories.

4. Prohibit assault style firearms from being stored in homes.

5. Ban all high-capacity ammunition magazines, grandfathered or new,
including .22lr.

6. Require gun owners to purchase liability insurance.

7. Tighten access to high-powered rounds of ammunition. (whatever
*that* means).

8. Mandate buyers to undergo background checks before purchasing weapons
at gun shows.

9. Require private gun sales to occur at the business of a licensed
dealer so that the sale can be tracked electronically.

10. Several more that create more "crimes" for owning a prohibited
gun, prohibited magazine, prohibited kind of ammo, and anything
else they can dream up and get passed.

Status:

The bill was filed in February, 2013 and is currently making the rounds
through the various required hearings before going to the capital for a
vote.



I would expect nothing less from the police state of Mass, after all,
those little police depts outside Boston and Worcester, north of the
TPK, are exactly the kind of "government" the framers were thinking of
when they wrote the Second Amendment into the Constitution...


Local police have WAY too much power these days. Neil Boortz had a spot
on reaction about this not long ago.
  #38   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,476
Default Do I need this?

On 8/22/2013 9:15 PM, True North wrote:
There you go with those homosexuals fantasies again.
There must be some place in St Thomas where you can work off your 'fustrations'.

He could probably better work off those frustrations, if he has them, in
Halifax, where there is an extraordinarily large homosexual population.
  #39   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,106
Default Do I need this?

On 8/23/2013 7:55 AM, True North wrote:
Isn't that sweet, L'il Snottie coming to the aid of Idiot Snottie.



This is why dick binned you...
  #40   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,605
Default Do I need this?

On 8/23/13 8:32 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 8/23/2013 7:55 AM, True North wrote:
Isn't that sweet, L'il Snottie coming to the aid of Idiot Snottie.



This is why dick binned you...



Because you and the other Snotty Scotty are soul brothers?
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017