![]() |
Do I need this?
On 8/23/13 1:35 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 8/23/13 1:07 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 8/23/13 11:26 AM, wrote: On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 06:42:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/22/13 10:01 PM, wrote: Liability Insurance is just a way to make lawyers rich. It figures you want more of it. Maybe we should tell everyone who pays for liability insurance that lawyers get a third to a half of all claims for basically doing nothing but driving up the amount of the claim. That does not include the money the insurance company lawyer gets, effectively making the cost of the claim about 3-4 times as much as the injured party ends up with., Now get out your checkbook and pay that insurance bill, sucker. Uh huh. So I suppose you don't have liability insurance on your car or homeowners insurance in case someone is injured on your property, right? Yes I do and I understand it is mostly lawyer tax Oh, I forgot. You don't like people who studied to get a professional degree. Military trade school is good enough for everyone. --------------------------- As a beneficiary of both, I'll offer my opinion. There's no question that in the civilian job market a college degree in the technical disciplines opens many more doors and can lead to higher incomes. However, some of the military technical schools, particularly in the Navy (sorry Army dudes) are excellent. Some require higher SAT and IQ levels than many colleges. I think the best is having both. I can accurately state that in my case I probably learned more practical applications from the Navy electronics schools than in college, although I'll admit my degree was obtained in bits and pieces over many years in many schools. The degree gave me credentials in the civilian workforce. The Navy gave me the real education that was useful. Looking back now, if I were ever in a situation where my life depended on the actions of a military trained vet and today's typical college grad, I'd much rather have the vet watching my back. Are there many college grads hiring themselves out as bodyguards? ----------------------- Doubtful. They are the first that usually need protection. Well, then, the bodyguards ought to be grateful because without the college grads, they'd have less work. |
Do I need this?
|
Do I need this?
On 8/23/2013 10:25 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 8/23/13 10:20 AM, True North wrote: On Friday, 23 August 2013 09:50:34 UTC-3, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On 8/23/2013 8:30 AM, Hank© wrote: On 8/22/2013 9:15 PM, True North wrote: There you go with those homosexuals fantasies again. There must be some place in St Thomas where you can work off your 'fustrations'. He could probably better work off those frustrations, if he has them, in Halifax, where there is an extraordinarily large homosexual population. I do remember him posting from a gay bar a while back... trying to "hook up" with a local iirc. Not that there's anything wrong with that:) You and your 'cousin' from St Thomas sure do have a fetish for gay sex. It's 2013...time to drop the Peter Pan lifestyle and finally emerge from the closet. PsychoSnotty's only chance for sex is with the other Scotty or with an Electrolux vacuum cleaner. Cite. |
Do I need this?
On 8/23/2013 10:24 AM, True North wrote:
On Friday, 23 August 2013 09:30:59 UTC-3, Hank© wrote: On 8/22/2013 9:15 PM, True North wrote: There you go with those homosexuals fantasies again. There must be some place in St Thomas where you can work off your 'fustrations'. He could probably better work off those frustrations, if he has them, in Halifax, where there is an extraordinarily large homosexual population. How would you know that...? You must be plugged into the 'lifestyle'. I must have read it on one of your tourism websites. Are you sayin it's not true? |
Do I need this?
On 8/23/2013 2:22 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/22/13 10:01 PM, wrote: On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 21:24:25 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/22/13 9:18 PM, wrote: On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:20:29 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Liability insurance may mean that those who are shot by guns owned by people with coverage may be entitled to some sort of compensation. That seems reasonable. Paid for by everyone, even those who don't own guns. That is what insurance is. Now there's an idea...force gun owners to get liability insurance and then let everyone who isn't a gun owner know they are subsidizing the gun owners. Liability Insurance is just a way to make lawyers rich. It figures you want more of it. Maybe we should tell everyone who pays for liability insurance that lawyers get a third to a half of all claims for basically doing nothing but driving up the amount of the claim. That does not include the money the insurance company lawyer gets, effectively making the cost of the claim about 3-4 times as much as the injured party ends up with., Now get out your checkbook and pay that insurance bill, sucker. Uh huh. So I suppose you don't have liability insurance on your car or homeowners insurance in case someone is injured on your property, right? Why do you have liability insurance? It is not to protect the other person! It is to protect your assets. Probably 40% of the drivers in San Jose, CA either have minimum insurance (30 k) or no insurance. Other than they are required to have it to drive, they do not need it. They have no assets to go after. I imagine that's the case with Harry as well. How much can a few guns and half interest in a canoe be worth? |
Do I need this?
|
Do I need this?
On Friday, August 23, 2013 3:11:49 PM UTC-4, Hank© wrote:
I must have read it on one of your tourism websites. Are you sayin it's not true? Cockhole wont be so mouthy when he turns around, ands sees me. I'll send him some Depends " Shields And Guards " before I arrive, so he won't be embarrassed when he ****es his pants in front of his Wife. |
Do I need this?
"Califbill" wrote in message ... I also have both military electronics school USAF and civilian electronics school, NCR computers, and an EE university degree.i hired lots of Cal and Stanford EEs over the years. Most have no practical knowledge. Were not as good of engineers as those with practical training also. And Mr. Luddite is correct. Navy techs were the best! Learned how to fix, and just not swap parts. ------------------------ The USAF had some good schools as well. Back "then" virtually all the electronic gear aboard ship was analog and most ran on vacuum tubes. The Navy ET's were taught theory, circuit design, and troubleshooting methods to enable them to repair equipment that they had never seen before. Sometimes I laugh because back then current flow was negative to positive only because that's the only way a tube could work in theory. I am sure that with the advancement in electronics, the shift to solid state and digital and the added complexity of the gear has caused more specialization in the military electronics schools. But back then, you were expected to fix anything. |
Do I need this?
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com