On 8/22/13 8:03 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
...

On 8/22/13 7:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"Tim" wrote in message
...

On Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:59:27 PM UTC-5, John H wrote:
Beautiful gun. Nice price.



http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5



John (Gun Nut) H.


For that price?

YES!

----------------------------

I really like some of the Kimber handguns although I've never fired
one. Unfortunately, the people's republic of Massachusetts has
determined that none of Kimber's models are worthy of being determined
to be MA compliant and it's therefore not possible for to buy one, new
or used.

Meanwhile, mini-me (Patrick Duval, Governor) has sponsored proposed
legislation to further limit what may be owned or done in MA with regard
to firearms. Included in the proposed changes to MA General Laws a

1. Limit of one firearm purchase per resident, per month. The
purchase of more than one firearm within a 30 day period will be a
felony,
punishable by 2.5 years in prison for the buyer.

2. Previously grandfathered magazine clips that hold 11 or more rounds
(standard Glock mag) must be legally disposed of within one year.
Only 7 round magazines will be permitted.

3. Require gun license applicants to disclose their mental health
histories.

4. Prohibit assault style firearms from being stored in homes.

5. Ban all high-capacity ammunition magazines, grandfathered or new,
including .22lr.

6. Require gun owners to purchase liability insurance.

7. Tighten access to high-powered rounds of ammunition. (whatever
*that* means).

8. Mandate buyers to undergo background checks before purchasing weapons
at gun shows.

9. Require private gun sales to occur at the business of a licensed
dealer so that the sale can be tracked electronically.

10. Several more that create more "crimes" for owning a prohibited
gun, prohibited magazine, prohibited kind of ammo, and anything
else they can dream up and get passed.

Status:

The bill was filed in February, 2013 and is currently making the rounds
through the various required hearings before going to the capital for a
vote.




Sounds pretty good to me.

---------------------

Of course.

I can understand the reasoning of some, but not all of the proposed law
changes.

To my knowledge, MA would be the first state to require liability
insurance to own a firearm, if approved. Doesn't make sense to me. How
does having liability insurance make gun ownership safer to the general
public? Basically, it says, "If I am negligent and you get hurt or
killed, don't worry ... I am insured."

Some of the others are just plain dumb and for effect only. Private
sales are already required to be electronically filed here. You do it
on-line and the state has a record of the transaction. Why do we now
have to pay a fee to a licensed dealer to record a private sale?

What set this off in my mind was doing some research for a friend of
mine. His wife just purchased a pre-ban Clock. Came with two, eleven
round magazines. Under the proposed legislation, pre-ban mags of 10
rounds or less will be allowed. Post ban magazines are currently
limited to seven rounds. If approved, she is legally obligated to
transfer her 11 round mags out of state or prove that they have been
destroyed by some form of not yet disclosed procedure.







Liability insurance may mean that those who are shot by guns owned by
people with coverage may be entitled to some sort of compensation. That
seems reasonable.

On Thursday, August 22, 2013 6:29:08 PM UTC-4, True North wrote:
Wait until they come out with a 'pink' version.

That would suit you to a 'T'.

Just like Cockhole Donnies Pink Butt Plug !!!!

On Thursday, August 22, 2013 7:07:03 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:


Oh, another gun. Just what our newsgroup right-wing racist needs. I was

hoping he was going to buy some compassion or empathy pills, which is

what he really needs.

Harry is becoming so stupid, he doesn't realize that NO ONE is reading ANYTHING of his.....LOL

On Thursday, August 22, 2013 8:05:05 PM UTC-4, True North wrote:
Too bad it wasn't a national initiative and enforced in all the states.

Too bad your stupidity wasn't regulated...we'd be better off.

There you go with those homosexuals fantasies again.
There must be some place in St Thomas where you can work off your 'fustrations'.

On 8/22/13 9:18 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:20:29 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:



Liability insurance may mean that those who are shot by guns owned by
people with coverage may be entitled to some sort of compensation. That
seems reasonable.

Paid for by everyone, even those who don't own guns. That is what
insurance is.



Now there's an idea...force gun owners to get liability insurance and
then let everyone who isn't a gun owner know they are subsidizing the
gun owners.

wrote in message news

I imagine all of the provisions demanding that people "dispose of"
already legally owned property will not survive a court challenge
unless the state is willing to provide just compensation.

It has been determined that banning something that was previously
legal is a "Taking"

------------------------------

Obviously, you have never lived in Massachusetts.

On Thursday, August 22, 2013 9:15:59 PM UTC-4, True North wrote:
There you go with those homosexuals fantasies again.

There must be some place in St Thomas where you can work off your 'fustrations'.

Oh there is....Halifax Nova Scotia.

Too bad you'll get the bad end of the stick, ****.

On Thursday, August 22, 2013 9:15:59 PM UTC-4, True North wrote:
There you go with those homosexuals fantasies again.

There must be some place in St Thomas where you can work off your 'fustrations'.

And your poor Wife will witness it all........

"True North" wrote in message
...

There you go with those homosexuals fantasies again.
There must be some place in St Thomas where you can work off your
'fustrations'.

----------------------

I hope you realize that the only reason the dip**** "slammer" ever
shows up in this newsgroup is because you respond to him.
Everyone else either has him filtered or simply ignore his pathetic
comments.

Do us a favor, will you? Ignore him. Responding to him simply
eggs his demented mind on.