On 10/29/2013 8:31 PM, Earl wrote:
John H wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 05:36:30 -0700 (PDT), True North
wrote:

I sometimes spell it like a lot if y'all pronounce it.
Show some respect. The reason you're not speaking Chinese is because
of 'America'.

Now you've answered two questions...here are the rest.

I cannot understand either the fear or the embarrassment that makes
you unable to answer the
questions. I cannot think of a question I would be afraid to answer as
long as it was about me and
not family, etc.

Again:

Would you be happy with a Sharia government in Canada? Would you like
a government like that of
Mexico in Canada? Just wondering what your thoughts are on the subject.


John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!


"Sharia" doesn't compute on his EOL Playbook so he is forced to ignore you.

It's "baby of the family" syndrome.. They are used to running their
mouths with mommy protecting them from the big brothers and sisters,
then in school, the same protecting them from themselves... These
"babies" are difficult to find accountable for running their mouth...

In article , says...

On 10/29/2013 8:31 PM, Earl wrote:
John H wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 05:36:30 -0700 (PDT), True North
wrote:

I sometimes spell it like a lot if y'all pronounce it.
Show some respect. The reason you're not speaking Chinese is because
of 'America'.

Now you've answered two questions...here are the rest.

I cannot understand either the fear or the embarrassment that makes
you unable to answer the
questions. I cannot think of a question I would be afraid to answer as
long as it was about me and
not family, etc.

Again:

Would you be happy with a Sharia government in Canada? Would you like
a government like that of
Mexico in Canada? Just wondering what your thoughts are on the subject.


John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!


"Sharia" doesn't compute on his EOL Playbook so he is forced to ignore you.

It's "baby of the family" syndrome.. They are used to running their
mouths with mommy protecting them from the big brothers and sisters,
then in school, the same protecting them from themselves... These
"babies" are difficult to find accountable for running their mouth...

That rates right up there with some of the dumbest crap to ever come
from your jawbone.

On 10/30/13, 7:56 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/29/2013 8:31 PM, Earl wrote:
John H wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 05:36:30 -0700 (PDT), True North
wrote:

I sometimes spell it like a lot if y'all pronounce it.
Show some respect. The reason you're not speaking Chinese is because
of 'America'.

Now you've answered two questions...here are the rest.

I cannot understand either the fear or the embarrassment that makes
you unable to answer the
questions. I cannot think of a question I would be afraid to answer as
long as it was about me and
not family, etc.

Again:

Would you be happy with a Sharia government in Canada? Would you like
a government like that of
Mexico in Canada? Just wondering what your thoughts are on the subject.


John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!


"Sharia" doesn't compute on his EOL Playbook so he is forced to ignore you.

It's "baby of the family" syndrome.. They are used to running their
mouths with mommy protecting them from the big brothers and sisters,
then in school, the same protecting them from themselves... These
"babies" are difficult to find accountable for running their mouth...

That rates right up there with some of the dumbest crap to ever come
from your jawbone.


There's no reason to take seriously anything a true psychotic like Scott
Ingersoll says.

--
Religion: together we can find the cure.

On 10/30/2013 8:04 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
There's no reason to take seriously anything a true psychotic like Scott
Ingersoll says.

--
Religion: together we can find the cure.

Who's the psychotic one?

On 10/30/2013 8:04 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
There's no reason to take seriously anything a true psychotic like Scott
Ingersoll says.

--
Religion: together we can find the cure.

How bout you? Are you to be taken seriously?

In article , says...

On 10/27/13, 2:05 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
If you live in a RED STATE and your governor has rejected the Affordable
Care Act, you will not be able to get the same assistance that those in
states that have accepted the ACA. Blame your governor, not the President or the ACA.

Tough titty, Floridians.

Prime example of a badly written law. Maybe if they had not rammed through
an unread law at the last minute, the law might actually work.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-...#axzz2iwfjGewk



And it only took two or three years to straighten out Medicare problems
when it was introduced...

I suppose you believe that Medicare is running a surplus.