100 rounds, 9mm, for $23.97. Not bad. Of course I could have paid a lot more at a union shop.

I wonder, in the wage comparison arena, do they take out the union dues before they compare the
wages? I suppose it depends on the media doing the comparing. As I recall, the dues for the NEA
weren't cheap!

On 2/20/14, 2:24 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
100 rounds, 9mm, for $23.97. Not bad. Of course I could have paid a lot more at a union shop.

I wonder, in the wage comparison arena, do they take out the union dues before they compare the
wages? I suppose it depends on the media doing the comparing. As I recall, the dues for the NEA
weren't cheap!



You really seem to have a problem with people making a living wage.
But...you didn't have that problem when you were sucking down paychecks
from the U.S. Army or for substitute babysitting in that northern
Virginia school system, and yet your skillset was no more valuable than
the Walmart clerk's, eh?

You bought the "white box" crap, right? Dirty ammo.

In article , says...

On 2/20/14, 2:24 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
100 rounds, 9mm, for $23.97. Not bad. Of course I could have paid a lot more at a union shop.

I wonder, in the wage comparison arena, do they take out the union dues before they compare the
wages? I suppose it depends on the media doing the comparing. As I recall, the dues for the NEA
weren't cheap!



You really seem to have a problem with people making a living wage.
But...you didn't have that problem when you were sucking down paychecks
from the U.S. Army or for substitute babysitting in that northern
Virginia school system, and yet your skillset was no more valuable than
the Walmart clerk's, eh?

You bought the "white box" crap, right? Dirty ammo.

People should be renumerated based upon their value to their employer.

As long as you buy 230gr ammo to feed your alleged .45 ACP you will be fine regardless of the
manufacturer.

On Thursday, 20 February 2014 19:52:03 UTC-4, BAR wrote:
In article , says...



On 2/20/14, 2:24 PM, Poco Loco wrote:

100 rounds, 9mm, for $23.97. Not bad. Of course I could have paid a lot more at a union shop.



I wonder, in the wage comparison arena, do they take out the union dues before they compare the

wages? I suppose it depends on the media doing the comparing. As I recall, the dues for the NEA

weren't cheap!







You really seem to have a problem with people making a living wage.

But...you didn't have that problem when you were sucking down paychecks

from the U.S. Army or for substitute babysitting in that northern

Virginia school system, and yet your skillset was no more valuable than

the Walmart clerk's, eh?



You bought the "white box" crap, right? Dirty ammo.



People should be renumerated based upon their value to their employer.



As long as you buy 230gr ammo to feed your alleged .45 ACP you will be fine regardless of the

manufacturer.

Only trouble with that is some employers value their own pocketbook much more than the employees who help fill it.

On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:47:45 -0800 (PST), True North wrote:

On Thursday, 20 February 2014 19:52:03 UTC-4, BAR wrote:
In article , says...



On 2/20/14, 2:24 PM, Poco Loco wrote:

100 rounds, 9mm, for $23.97. Not bad. Of course I could have paid a lot more at a union shop.



I wonder, in the wage comparison arena, do they take out the union dues before they compare the

wages? I suppose it depends on the media doing the comparing. As I recall, the dues for the NEA

weren't cheap!







You really seem to have a problem with people making a living wage.

But...you didn't have that problem when you were sucking down paychecks

from the U.S. Army or for substitute babysitting in that northern

Virginia school system, and yet your skillset was no more valuable than

the Walmart clerk's, eh?



You bought the "white box" crap, right? Dirty ammo.



People should be renumerated based upon their value to their employer.



As long as you buy 230gr ammo to feed your alleged .45 ACP you will be fine regardless of the

manufacturer.

Only trouble with that is some employers value their own pocketbook much more than the employees who help fill it.

What the hell does that have to do with 'white box' ammo, Don?

Ask Bar, Johnny.
I was replying to his customary anti-union drivel.

On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:29:53 -0800 (PST), True North wrote:

Ask Bar, Johnny.
I was replying to his customary anti-union drivel.

Ask Bar what, Don? What anti-union drivel (which, by the way, is the best oxymoron you've come up
with in a long time.)?

In article , says...

On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:47:45 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote:

On Thursday, 20 February 2014 19:52:03 UTC-4, BAR wrote:
In article , says...



On 2/20/14, 2:24 PM, Poco Loco wrote:

100 rounds, 9mm, for $23.97. Not bad. Of course I could have paid a lot more at a union shop.



I wonder, in the wage comparison arena, do they take out the union dues before they compare the

wages? I suppose it depends on the media doing the comparing. As I recall, the dues for the NEA

weren't cheap!







You really seem to have a problem with people making a living wage.

But...you didn't have that problem when you were sucking down paychecks

from the U.S. Army or for substitute babysitting in that northern

Virginia school system, and yet your skillset was no more valuable than

the Walmart clerk's, eh?



You bought the "white box" crap, right? Dirty ammo.



People should be renumerated based upon their value to their employer.



As long as you buy 230gr ammo to feed your alleged .45 ACP you will be fine regardless of the

manufacturer.

Only trouble with that is some employers value their own pocketbook much more than the employees who help fill it.

When you shop, do you look at the price tag?

Half my day is calculating ROI on programs and projects.

On 2/21/2014 7:36 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:29:53 -0800 (PST), True North wrote:

Ask Bar, Johnny.
I was replying to his customary anti-union drivel.
Harry's department.
Ask Bar what, Don? What anti-union drivel (which, by the way, is the best oxymoron you've come up
with in a long time.)?

Union drivel? Isn't that Harry's department?