Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/28/2014 12:22 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:11:37 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/28/2014 9:43 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:38:11 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/28/2014 8:16 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 04:50:05 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Friday, February 28, 2014 6:31:44 AM UTC-6, John H. wrote: But, they just got some parts and fixed it! I'd like to see pictures and a story just about that. But the bottom line was typical Guzzi: "The alternator died because we were overtaxing it with the two fans—we swapped batteries at each driver change. The oil-pressure gauge started showing zero psi, yet it kept running, so we kept driving it. Eventually, it crossed the finish on day two with the checkers." Reminds me of the time one of my coils died, but the 850T got Sandy and I home on one cylinder - from Munich to Stuttgart. The bike sounded like a 'Ma Deuce' going down the road without the plug, but it got us home. bet it shook like thunder too! Like shooting the M-2. The other day you asked about Guzzi's big bike. I came across this review this morning. http://www.motorcycle.com/manufacturer/2013-moto-guzzi-california-1400-touring-ambassador-review-91469.html Almost hate to mention this but the picture in your link is a perfect example of counter-steering. Very slight pressure against the direction of the turn keep front fork and wheel aligned with rear wheel. You can almost sense it. http://www.motorcycle.com/gallery/gallery.php/d/358550-1/2013-moto-guzzi-california-1400-touring-action-30.jpg Yup, and it's a beautiful bike also! I am wondering how other big bike manufacturers like Moto-Guzzi are dealing with EPA exhaust standards on their new bikes. Harley-Davidson has been putting catalytic converters on all their bikes since 2010 and the big, touring models for 2014 will be water-cooled vs the traditional air cooling. I heard about this when I bought my last UltraClassic. I went for a 2009 model to avoid the catalytic converter (which were new in the 2010 models). The ones equipped with a cat have to be tuned very lean to meet EPA emission standards and the lean mixture makes them run hotter than previous models. There was also talk at the time (apparently true) that the big bikes would eventually have to go to liquid cooling because air cooling had too many engine temp variables to meet the EPA standards. The engine has to be kept at a fairly constant temp (like a car) in order to meet the emission standards. Even the 2009 model I had could burn the inside of your right leg if you got caught in stop and go traffic on a hot day. You could have the bike programmed to shut off the front cylinder under certain conditions (stopped, clutch lever pulled, throttle at idle) which would allow the front cylinder to simply pump air, minus fuel and ignition, in order to lower the overall engine temp. As soon as you started to hit the throttle and engage the clutch, it started firing again. Guzzis have had catalytic converters from about 2003 onward. From the Guzzi forums, it seems like lots of folks get rid of them (illegally). I've had 'Competition Only' exhaust on my Guzzi since about 1992, and haven't had a problem with any 'enforcers' yet. It's not as loud as a straight pipe Harley, so I'm OK on the noise side - but not by much. Guzzis are still air cooled. I've never had a problem with the heat from the engine, although the cylinder design would indicate that a lot of heat would blow back on the legs. In cold weather, it's nice to be able to lay hands on the valve covers at stop lights for a quick warm up. I do it moving also. I wonder if that rear cylinder on Harleys doesn't get really hot because it's not in the air flow. I see, looking at Google, they're starting to water cool their engines. I'd never have thought that Harley would come up with something as advanced as one cylinder shutting down at a stop light. It was due to the design of the exhaust on the big bikes. There is (or was) a crossover that connected right below your right thigh. Not a problem as long as the bike was moving but on hot days in stop and go traffic, the area of the crossover started to sear your thigh. Only happened to me twice ... once on the way to the Cape when traffic at the bridge got backed up and the other when I went to DC for Rolling Thunder. We were staying at a motel in Manassas, VA and the ride back from the Mall was brutal due to traffic. |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/28/2014 8:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/28/2014 8:16 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 04:50:05 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Friday, February 28, 2014 6:31:44 AM UTC-6, John H. wrote: But, they just got some parts and fixed it! I'd like to see pictures and a story just about that. But the bottom line was typical Guzzi: "The alternator died because we were overtaxing it with the two fans—we swapped batteries at each driver change. The oil-pressure gauge started showing zero psi, yet it kept running, so we kept driving it. Eventually, it crossed the finish on day two with the checkers." Reminds me of the time one of my coils died, but the 850T got Sandy and I home on one cylinder - from Munich to Stuttgart. The bike sounded like a 'Ma Deuce' going down the road without the plug, but it got us home. bet it shook like thunder too! Like shooting the M-2. The other day you asked about Guzzi's big bike. I came across this review this morning. http://www.motorcycle.com/manufacturer/2013-moto-guzzi-california-1400-touring-ambassador-review-91469.html Almost hate to mention this but the picture in your link is a perfect example of counter-steering. Very slight pressure against the direction of the turn keep front fork and wheel aligned with rear wheel. You can almost sense it. http://www.motorcycle.com/gallery/gallery.php/d/358550-1/2013-moto-guzzi-california-1400-touring-action-30.jpg troll. |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, February 28, 2014 10:11:37 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/28/2014 9:43 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:38:11 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/28/2014 8:16 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 04:50:05 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Friday, February 28, 2014 6:31:44 AM UTC-6, John H. wrote: But, they just got some parts and fixed it! I'd like to see pictures and a story just about that. But the bottom line was typical Guzzi: "The alternator died because we were overtaxing it with the two fans--we swapped batteries at each driver change. The oil-pressure gauge started showing zero psi, yet it kept running, so we kept driving it. Eventually, it crossed the finish on day two with the checkers." Reminds me of the time one of my coils died, but the 850T got Sandy and I home on one cylinder - from Munich to Stuttgart. The bike sounded like a 'Ma Deuce' going down the road without the plug, but it got us home. bet it shook like thunder too! Like shooting the M-2. The other day you asked about Guzzi's big bike. I came across this review this morning. http://www.motorcycle.com/manufacturer/2013-moto-guzzi-california-1400-touring-ambassador-review-91469.html Almost hate to mention this but the picture in your link is a perfect example of counter-steering. Very slight pressure against the direction of the turn keep front fork and wheel aligned with rear wheel. You can almost sense it. http://www.motorcycle.com/gallery/gallery.php/d/358550-1/2013-moto-guzzi-california-1400-touring-action-30.jpg Yup, and it's a beautiful bike also! I am wondering how other big bike manufacturers like Moto-Guzzi are dealing with EPA exhaust standards on their new bikes. Harley-Davidson has been putting catalytic converters on all their bikes since 2010 and the big, touring models for 2014 will be water-cooled vs the traditional air cooling. I heard about this when I bought my last UltraClassic. I went for a 2009 model to avoid the catalytic converter (which were new in the 2010 models). The ones equipped with a cat have to be tuned very lean to meet EPA emission standards and the lean mixture makes them run hotter than previous models. There was also talk at the time (apparently true) that the big bikes would eventually have to go to liquid cooling because air cooling had too many engine temp variables to meet the EPA standards. The engine has to be kept at a fairly constant temp (like a car) in order to meet the emission standards. Even the 2009 model I had could burn the inside of your right leg if you got caught in stop and go traffic on a hot day. You could have the bike programmed to shut off the front cylinder under certain conditions (stopped, clutch lever pulled, throttle at idle) which would allow the front cylinder to simply pump air, minus fuel and ignition, in order to lower the overall engine temp. As soon as you started to hit the throttle and engage the clutch, it started firing again. My brother in NC has a 2009 Harley. His shuts down the front cylinder at stop lights as you mentioned. His came that way, no extra programming required. He's been happy with it - no problems. He's happy that he waited for the 2009. He'd had one before but he was looking forward to all the changes that came with the 2009 model. (Of which I know nothing, naturally.) As soon as I asked him about it, he says, "What's up, you thinking of buying a Harley, finally?" Told him I might do so when the Guzzi hits 50 years old. |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:52:38 -0600, HanK wrote:
On 2/28/2014 8:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/28/2014 8:16 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 04:50:05 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Friday, February 28, 2014 6:31:44 AM UTC-6, John H. wrote: But, they just got some parts and fixed it! I'd like to see pictures and a story just about that. But the bottom line was typical Guzzi: "The alternator died because we were overtaxing it with the two fans—we swapped batteries at each driver change. The oil-pressure gauge started showing zero psi, yet it kept running, so we kept driving it. Eventually, it crossed the finish on day two with the checkers." Reminds me of the time one of my coils died, but the 850T got Sandy and I home on one cylinder - from Munich to Stuttgart. The bike sounded like a 'Ma Deuce' going down the road without the plug, but it got us home. bet it shook like thunder too! Like shooting the M-2. The other day you asked about Guzzi's big bike. I came across this review this morning. http://www.motorcycle.com/manufacturer/2013-moto-guzzi-california-1400-touring-ambassador-review-91469.html Almost hate to mention this but the picture in your link is a perfect example of counter-steering. Very slight pressure against the direction of the turn keep front fork and wheel aligned with rear wheel. You can almost sense it. http://www.motorcycle.com/gallery/gallery.php/d/358550-1/2013-moto-guzzi-california-1400-touring-action-30.jpg troll. Observant troll! :) |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/28/2014 3:05 PM, John H wrote:
On Friday, February 28, 2014 10:11:37 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/28/2014 9:43 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:38:11 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/28/2014 8:16 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 04:50:05 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Friday, February 28, 2014 6:31:44 AM UTC-6, John H. wrote: But, they just got some parts and fixed it! I'd like to see pictures and a story just about that. But the bottom line was typical Guzzi: "The alternator died because we were overtaxing it with the two fans--we swapped batteries at each driver change. The oil-pressure gauge started showing zero psi, yet it kept running, so we kept driving it. Eventually, it crossed the finish on day two with the checkers." Reminds me of the time one of my coils died, but the 850T got Sandy and I home on one cylinder - from Munich to Stuttgart. The bike sounded like a 'Ma Deuce' going down the road without the plug, but it got us home. bet it shook like thunder too! Like shooting the M-2. The other day you asked about Guzzi's big bike. I came across this review this morning. http://www.motorcycle.com/manufacturer/2013-moto-guzzi-california-1400-touring-ambassador-review-91469.html Almost hate to mention this but the picture in your link is a perfect example of counter-steering. Very slight pressure against the direction of the turn keep front fork and wheel aligned with rear wheel. You can almost sense it. http://www.motorcycle.com/gallery/gallery.php/d/358550-1/2013-moto-guzzi-california-1400-touring-action-30.jpg Yup, and it's a beautiful bike also! I am wondering how other big bike manufacturers like Moto-Guzzi are dealing with EPA exhaust standards on their new bikes. Harley-Davidson has been putting catalytic converters on all their bikes since 2010 and the big, touring models for 2014 will be water-cooled vs the traditional air cooling. I heard about this when I bought my last UltraClassic. I went for a 2009 model to avoid the catalytic converter (which were new in the 2010 models). The ones equipped with a cat have to be tuned very lean to meet EPA emission standards and the lean mixture makes them run hotter than previous models. There was also talk at the time (apparently true) that the big bikes would eventually have to go to liquid cooling because air cooling had too many engine temp variables to meet the EPA standards. The engine has to be kept at a fairly constant temp (like a car) in order to meet the emission standards. Even the 2009 model I had could burn the inside of your right leg if you got caught in stop and go traffic on a hot day. You could have the bike programmed to shut off the front cylinder under certain conditions (stopped, clutch lever pulled, throttle at idle) which would allow the front cylinder to simply pump air, minus fuel and ignition, in order to lower the overall engine temp. As soon as you started to hit the throttle and engage the clutch, it started firing again. My brother in NC has a 2009 Harley. His shuts down the front cylinder at stop lights as you mentioned. His came that way, no extra programming required. He's been happy with it - no problems. He's happy that he waited for the 2009. He'd had one before but he was looking forward to all the changes that came with the 2009 model. (Of which I know nothing, naturally.) As soon as I asked him about it, he says, "What's up, you thinking of buying a Harley, finally?" Told him I might do so when the Guzzi hits 50 years old. I originally had a 2002 Harley UltraClassic. I traded it in on the 2009 model mainly for two reasons. First, I heard that models after 2009 would have the catalytic converters and would run hotter due to having to be tuned very lean. The other reason, and more important, is that Harley added another gear .. basically an overdrive ... and increased the hp in the 2009 model. I liked that a lot. I've forgotten the exact numbers but cruising at 70-75 mph on the highway, the engine was only turning about 2400-2600 RPM. The overdrive (or 6th gear) wasn't recommended under 60 mph. |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:57:19 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/28/2014 3:05 PM, John H wrote: On Friday, February 28, 2014 10:11:37 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/28/2014 9:43 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:38:11 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/28/2014 8:16 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 04:50:05 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Friday, February 28, 2014 6:31:44 AM UTC-6, John H. wrote: But, they just got some parts and fixed it! I'd like to see pictures and a story just about that. But the bottom line was typical Guzzi: "The alternator died because we were overtaxing it with the two fans--we swapped batteries at each driver change. The oil-pressure gauge started showing zero psi, yet it kept running, so we kept driving it. Eventually, it crossed the finish on day two with the checkers." Reminds me of the time one of my coils died, but the 850T got Sandy and I home on one cylinder - from Munich to Stuttgart. The bike sounded like a 'Ma Deuce' going down the road without the plug, but it got us home. bet it shook like thunder too! Like shooting the M-2. The other day you asked about Guzzi's big bike. I came across this review this morning. http://www.motorcycle.com/manufacturer/2013-moto-guzzi-california-1400-touring-ambassador-review-91469.html Almost hate to mention this but the picture in your link is a perfect example of counter-steering. Very slight pressure against the direction of the turn keep front fork and wheel aligned with rear wheel. You can almost sense it. http://www.motorcycle.com/gallery/gallery.php/d/358550-1/2013-moto-guzzi-california-1400-touring-action-30.jpg Yup, and it's a beautiful bike also! I am wondering how other big bike manufacturers like Moto-Guzzi are dealing with EPA exhaust standards on their new bikes. Harley-Davidson has been putting catalytic converters on all their bikes since 2010 and the big, touring models for 2014 will be water-cooled vs the traditional air cooling. I heard about this when I bought my last UltraClassic. I went for a 2009 model to avoid the catalytic converter (which were new in the 2010 models). The ones equipped with a cat have to be tuned very lean to meet EPA emission standards and the lean mixture makes them run hotter than previous models. There was also talk at the time (apparently true) that the big bikes would eventually have to go to liquid cooling because air cooling had too many engine temp variables to meet the EPA standards. The engine has to be kept at a fairly constant temp (like a car) in order to meet the emission standards. Even the 2009 model I had could burn the inside of your right leg if you got caught in stop and go traffic on a hot day. You could have the bike programmed to shut off the front cylinder under certain conditions (stopped, clutch lever pulled, throttle at idle) which would allow the front cylinder to simply pump air, minus fuel and ignition, in order to lower the overall engine temp. As soon as you started to hit the throttle and engage the clutch, it started firing again. My brother in NC has a 2009 Harley. His shuts down the front cylinder at stop lights as you mentioned. His came that way, no extra programming required. He's been happy with it - no problems. He's happy that he waited for the 2009. He'd had one before but he was looking forward to all the changes that came with the 2009 model. (Of which I know nothing, naturally.) As soon as I asked him about it, he says, "What's up, you thinking of buying a Harley, finally?" Told him I might do so when the Guzzi hits 50 years old. I originally had a 2002 Harley UltraClassic. I traded it in on the 2009 model mainly for two reasons. First, I heard that models after 2009 would have the catalytic converters and would run hotter due to having to be tuned very lean. The other reason, and more important, is that Harley added another gear .. basically an overdrive ... and increased the hp in the 2009 model. I liked that a lot. I've forgotten the exact numbers but cruising at 70-75 mph on the highway, the engine was only turning about 2400-2600 RPM. The overdrive (or 6th gear) wasn't recommended under 60 mph. Well, if you get ready to sell it, let me know. I could maybe own a Harley as a second bike. But if I rode it to Rolling Thunder, the bike wouldn't get near the attention the Moto Guzzi does. Most of those folks are like, "Wow, I thought they stopped making those right after World War Two." My bro loves his 2009, |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, February 28, 2014 5:10:59 PM UTC-6, John H. wrote:
I rode it to Rolling Thunder, the bike wouldn't get near the attention the Moto Guzzi does. Most of those folks are like, "Wow, I thought they stopped making those right after World War Two." They stopped improving them after WWII. It's hard to improve a hammer. |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/28/2014 6:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
Almost hate to mention this but the picture in your link is a perfect example of counter-steering. Very slight pressure against the direction of the turn keep front fork and wheel aligned with rear wheel. You can almost sense it. I'll be damned if I can figure out how you guys think you can possibly discern a subtle pressure applied to the bars from a static photograph...? ![]() |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/1/2014 12:08 AM, thumper wrote:
On 2/28/2014 6:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: Almost hate to mention this but the picture in your link is a perfect example of counter-steering. Very slight pressure against the direction of the turn keep front fork and wheel aligned with rear wheel. You can almost sense it. I'll be damned if I can figure out how you guys think you can possibly discern a subtle pressure applied to the bars from a static photograph...? ![]() Trolls have amazing abilities beyond that of we mere mortals... |
#20
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/1/2014 12:08 AM, thumper wrote:
On 2/28/2014 6:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: Almost hate to mention this but the picture in your link is a perfect example of counter-steering. Very slight pressure against the direction of the turn keep front fork and wheel aligned with rear wheel. You can almost sense it. I'll be damned if I can figure out how you guys think you can possibly discern a subtle pressure applied to the bars from a static photograph...? ![]() You turn your way, I'll turn mine. :-) (all you have to do is to look at the front fork and wheel angle closely) That's enough though. I wasn't in a "troll" mode. It was just an observation. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|