Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/26/14, 9:25 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 19:53:38 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 7/26/14, 7:28 PM, wrote: On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:55:03 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: Tried one of my near neighbor's rifles this afternoon, a Ruger Mini 14. I've been interested in one for a while, and have fired one before, but this was the first time I had an opportunity to put 40 rounds through one. Accurate enough for me at 50 yards, didn't try anything farther out. Would be an interesting candidate for a silencer. Looked like this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ej39umHaB08 Mini 14s are pretty good but I would be surprised that they even let you have one in the "unfree" state. It is an assault rifle in places that use that ridiculous term. I also wonder if your sheriff signs BATF form 4's for the suppressor. My friend who was a class III collector moved to Virginia to get away from the bull****. He had a real nice mini, selective fire, suppressor, optics and all in stainless. The suppressor will reduce the muzzle blast quite a bit but you are still dealing with the crack of the bullet. The good news in the 5.56x45 is commodity ammo and when things settle down it will be pretty cheap again. The Mini 14s and 30s are Maryland legal, except for models with folding stocks. They are not. Matters not to me...I prefer the wood or plastic "standard" stocks to the "AR" style stocks. If I decided I wanted one, I'd be hard pressed to choose between the 14 and the 30. I would lean toward the 7.62x39. The ammo is more available at commodity prices and it has better down range performance unless you are just shooting woodchucks or something. The 5.56 is great for wounding people grievously but not much else. Most of the 7.62x39 ammo I've seen for sale at decent prices is the steel-cased Russian crap. I have my doubts about how well steel-cased ammo cycles. The brass cased ammo in that caliber is much more expensive. I don't shoot woodchucks or any other critters. |
#23
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 07:54:45 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On 7/26/2014 4:55 PM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 7/26/14, 4:40 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 7/26/2014 3:03 PM, wrote: On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 05:07:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Friday, July 25, 2014 11:23:52 PM UTC-4, Wayne. B wrote: On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 20:33:32 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Better off with a simple Ford or Chevy that can be repaired by just about anyone. === Personally I prefer a Toyota or Honda that rarely needs to be repaired by anyone. Plus, the dealer told me that in order to keep up the warranty, I needed to follow the strict "bring it in every 75oo miles" service schedule in the warranty book. I guess that dealer never read the MAGNUSON-MOSS WARRANTY ACT. They can not require you to use any particular service provider or any particular brand of parts or supplies. In the case of the two BMW M5s I had, if BMW couldn't resolve the software issues that controls everything, including shifting from Park to Drive, who the heck else was going to fix it? Both of them experienced the "Red Cog of Death" (orange alert on the panel) and the car wouldn't shift out of neutral. Happened to some people while tooling down the highway. Fortunately for me it happened in my driveway both times. Dealer had to send a flatbed truck down and haul them away. Also, it's not necessarily a case of repairing items or replacing parts. Those cars had a very specific and detailed "break-in" procedure with more than usual dealer "check ups" required to keep the warranty valid. The car computer recorded all data ... max engine RPM, acceleration rates, etc. I remember that you had to keep RPMs below a certain level for the first 1200 or 1500 miles, then start to slowly increase. If they found you violated any of the break-in restrictions and something went wrong, your warranty was at risk. Bottom line ... nice car but a pain in the ass to own. The Porsche was different. Old school. No fancy electronic controls with software that crashed or hung up. Six speed manual transmission and 450 hp in a car under 3000 lbs. Handled like it was on rails at 35 mph or 120 mph. I enjoyed it for a year or so but then realized it just wasn't "me". I am a pick-up type. Far more practical and functional. I went the other way, and no longer have a pick-me-up truck. ![]() But I kept the 4Runner. Over 200,000 miles on it at the moment. Tried one of my near neighbor's rifles this afternoon, a Ruger Mini 14. I've been interested in one for a while, and have fired one before, but this was the first time I had an opportunity to put 40 rounds through one. Accurate enough for me at 50 yards, didn't try anything farther out. Would be an interesting candidate for a silencer. Looked like this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ej39umHaB08 I just saw this the other day for the first time. Turns out the USA doesn't hold an exclusive claim to "gun nuts". If you haven't seen it, make sure you watch the entire video where he demonstrates the fully automatic Glock 17. The Glock 18 is the one that can go full-auto. The Glock 18 is a selective fire variant of the Glock 17, developed at the request of the Austrian counter-terrorist unit EKO Cobra. This machine pistol?class firearm has a lever-type fire-control selector switch, installed on the serrated portion of the rear left side of the slide. With the selector lever in the bottom position, the pistol will fire fully automatic, and with the selector lever in the top position, the pistol will fire semi-automatically. The firearm is typically used with an extended 33-round capacity magazine, although other magazines from the Glock 17 will function, with available capacities of 10, 17, or 19 rounds. Early Glock 18 models were ported to reduce muzzle rise during automatic fire. Another compensated variant was produced, known as the Glock 18C. It has a keyhole opening cut into the forward portion of the slide, similar to the opening on the Glock long-slide models, although the Glock 18 has a standard-length slide. The keyhole opening provides an area to allow the four, progressively larger (from back to front) compensator cuts machined into the barrel to vent the propellant gases upwards, affording more control over the rapid-firing machine pistol. "That's what I'm f---in' talkin' about". LOL. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbsgHbXubGU Thanks for the info. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mr Luddite | General | |||
Yo Luddite | General | |||
Yo Luddite | General | |||
For Mr. Luddite... | General | |||
Not so much a Luddite in my old age | General |