Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,524
Default FAA May Continue to Regulate Drones



On Tuesday, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)—a federal
agency that evaluates aviation accidents—held that the Federal Aviation
Administration should be able to regulate small unmanned aircrafts, like
drones or model planes.

The FAA was appealing a lower court ruling, which held that a Swiss
pilot named Raphael "Trappy" Pirker did not have to pay a $10,000 fine
imposed by the FAA for "reckless flight" at the University of Virginia,
because his drone wasn't an "aircraft" under FAA regulations. Since the
agency has strict rules about reckless aircraft operation, allowing for
blanket regulation of small drones could lead to a total ban of unmanned
devices. (Pirker's lawyer, Brendan Schulman, has appeared on the New
America Foundation's DroneU podcast to talk about issues surrounding FAA
regulation of small and/or autonomous aircraft.)

Former FAA general counsel Kenneth Quinn told NBC News that, "It's a
huge win for the FAA, and signals it's not going to be the Wild West for
drones, but a careful, orderly, safe introduction of unmanned aircraft
systems into the national airspace system."



Drones and the right-wing drones who fly them...like Johnny ****head
Herring here.


--
Just because you are opposed to abortion doesn’t make you pro-life. Your
morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a
child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed, not a child
clothed, not a child able to see the doctor. That’s not pro-life…that’s
pro-birth.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2014
Posts: 580
Default FAA May Continue to Regulate Drones

On 11/19/2014 7:50 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:


On Tuesday, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)—a federal
agency that evaluates aviation accidents—held that the Federal Aviation
Administration should be able to regulate small unmanned aircrafts, like
drones or model planes.

The FAA was appealing a lower court ruling, which held that a Swiss
pilot named Raphael "Trappy" Pirker did not have to pay a $10,000 fine
imposed by the FAA for "reckless flight" at the University of Virginia,
because his drone wasn't an "aircraft" under FAA regulations. Since the
agency has strict rules about reckless aircraft operation, allowing for
blanket regulation of small drones could lead to a total ban of unmanned
devices. (Pirker's lawyer, Brendan Schulman, has appeared on the New
America Foundation's DroneU podcast to talk about issues surrounding FAA
regulation of small and/or autonomous aircraft.)

Former FAA general counsel Kenneth Quinn told NBC News that, "It's a
huge win for the FAA, and signals it's not going to be the Wild West for
drones, but a careful, orderly, safe introduction of unmanned aircraft
systems into the national airspace system."



Drones and the right-wing drones who fly them...like Johnny ****head
Herring here.


IOW "I'm not interested in flying hobbies, so screw you" Typical Krausebag.
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,344
Default FAA May Continue to Regulate Drones

On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 08:57:30 -0500, Harrold wrote:

On 11/19/2014 7:50 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:


On Tuesday, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)—a federal
agency that evaluates aviation accidents—held that the Federal Aviation
Administration should be able to regulate small unmanned aircrafts, like
drones or model planes.

The FAA was appealing a lower court ruling, which held that a Swiss
pilot named Raphael "Trappy" Pirker did not have to pay a $10,000 fine
imposed by the FAA for "reckless flight" at the University of Virginia,
because his drone wasn't an "aircraft" under FAA regulations. Since the
agency has strict rules about reckless aircraft operation, allowing for
blanket regulation of small drones could lead to a total ban of unmanned
devices. (Pirker's lawyer, Brendan Schulman, has appeared on the New
America Foundation's DroneU podcast to talk about issues surrounding FAA
regulation of small and/or autonomous aircraft.)

Former FAA general counsel Kenneth Quinn told NBC News that, "It's a
huge win for the FAA, and signals it's not going to be the Wild West for
drones, but a careful, orderly, safe introduction of unmanned aircraft
systems into the national airspace system."



Drones and the right-wing drones who fly them...like Johnny ****head
Herring here.


IOW "I'm not interested in flying hobbies, so screw you" Typical Krausebag.


Poor TOAD. Spending his days looking for negatives.
  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2014
Posts: 580
Default FAA May Continue to Regulate Drones

On 11/19/2014 6:01 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:57:04 -0500, Harrold wrote:

On 11/19/2014 5:09 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 11/19/14 5:08 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 14:25:36 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/19/14 1:54 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 07:50:05 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

Drones and the right-wing drones who fly them...like Johnny ****head
Herring here.

... There he goes again. You start out with a cogent statement and
then sign it with a brain fart



Herring lacks empathy and therefore is less than a brain fart, but I
understand what you are trying to say.

I would try to empathize with you, but I have a hard time
understanding why you are so bitter. Perhaps if you discussed your
childhood a little more it would help. I know your dad must have left
you alone for long periods, like when he crossed the Atlantic in that
rowboat, but I don't know what else transpired.


Rowboat, eh? That's a laugh. Who made that one up?
I'm not bitter, ****head John. I just have no use for right-wing trash,
like you and several of your buddies here.

You have every reason to be bitter. Two bankruptcys, foreclosure, failed
business, failing health, mental problems, low self esteem. What a
basket case.


A narcissist in denial - swimming upstream too.

Poor, poor Toad.

He can't deny any of it. It's all out there on the internets to be
easily verified.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Will your GPS continue working? John H[_2_] General 6 July 16th 11 06:45 PM
Nah...we don't need to regulate business... HK General 2 March 7th 09 06:30 AM
Zac's problems continue Gordon Cruising 11 November 13th 08 11:03 PM
Florida judge limits rights of local governments to regulate use of public waterways Chuck Gould General 12 November 4th 07 10:45 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017