On Thursday, 11 December 2014 12:18:57 UTC-4, John H wrote:
On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 8:39:18 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 4:07:58 PM UTC-5, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:03:23 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/14 4:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...target shooting today:

http://tinyurl.com/q7lrxba


Holes at left from my .22LR S&W AR-15/22. Just ordinary LRN ammo, 40
grain. Sighting in scope from the top to the bottom, where I got a two
shot group of a hair more than an inch. 100 yards.

Holes on right from my 1892 Win carbine in .357 MAG. Already sighted in
with the red dot for 100 yards, so the two shot group was what I
expected to see. Just regular ball ammo.



Whoops...this is the back side of the chunk of cardboard. The other side
is just plain brown and the holes don't "pop" as well visually.

Wow. That's extremely impressive.

WAFJ!


Ff sake herring, krause poked those holes through with his hand.
krause couldn't even see the ****ing target without a 10 power scope.

100 yards....what a joke.

Hey - you're filtered (except on Google Groups), but - that was funny! Others are thinking the same thing!

Hey johnny..
what are you doing...conversing with the likes of Dickson?
Oh, I see...it's 'do as I say...not as I do' again.

On 12/11/14 11:23 AM, John H wrote:
On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 11:05:45 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/10/14 6:36 PM, Califbill wrote:
BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On 12/10/14 4:08 PM, Toad Gig wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:03:23 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/14 4:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...target shooting today:

http://tinyurl.com/q7lrxba


Holes at left from my .22LR S&W AR-15/22. Just ordinary LRN ammo, 40
grain. Sighting in scope from the top to the bottom, where I got a two
shot group of a hair more than an inch. 100 yards.

Holes on right from my 1892 Win carbine in .357 MAG. Already sighted in
with the red dot for 100 yards, so the two shot group was what I
expected to see. Just regular ball ammo.



Whoops...this is the back side of the chunk of cardboard. The other side
is just plain brown and the holes don't "pop" as well visually.

Wow. That's extremely impressive.

WAFJ!


Yeah, JohnnyTrash, if only you could see a small target at 100 yards,
eh?

What's the matter you cant hold a 1 inch group?

Nobody believe's you were shooting 100 yards.

And with a scope? Either crappy firearm, or crappy shooter.



snerk How's your shooting with a non-target .22LR firearm at 100
yards, Bilious? I got on the paper with my first shot. Oh, and no scope
on the carbine...just a 3 MOA red dot.




I shoot that well with my 223 AR and no red dot or scope.

Bull****. You aren't shooting 1" groups at 100 yards on an ordinary AR15
with metal sights only. Bull****, bull****, bull****.
--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Toad, just for the record, were you using two hands or one? I know better than to ask if the rifle was supported. Are you sure you showed us the back side. Those holes look pretty clean for being on the back side of cardboard. (Not that I'm doubting anything you say, mind you.)

BTW, do you own round pencils or hexagonal pencils? Just askin'.


The muzzle ends of the rifles were supported on my shooting bag.

--
I feel no need to explain my politics to stupid right-wingers.
After all, I am *not* the Jackass Whisperer.

On 12/11/14 11:31 AM, True North wrote:
On Thursday, 11 December 2014 12:18:57 UTC-4, John H wrote:
On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 8:39:18 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 4:07:58 PM UTC-5, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:03:23 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/14 4:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...target shooting today:

http://tinyurl.com/q7lrxba


Holes at left from my .22LR S&W AR-15/22. Just ordinary LRN ammo, 40
grain. Sighting in scope from the top to the bottom, where I got a two
shot group of a hair more than an inch. 100 yards.

Holes on right from my 1892 Win carbine in .357 MAG. Already sighted in
with the red dot for 100 yards, so the two shot group was what I
expected to see. Just regular ball ammo.



Whoops...this is the back side of the chunk of cardboard. The other side
is just plain brown and the holes don't "pop" as well visually.

Wow. That's extremely impressive.

WAFJ!


Ff sake herring, krause poked those holes through with his hand.
krause couldn't even see the ****ing target without a 10 power scope.

100 yards....what a joke.

Hey - you're filtered (except on Google Groups), but - that was funny! Others are thinking the same thing!

Hey johnny..
what are you doing...conversing with the likes of Dickson?
Oh, I see...it's 'do as I say...not as I do' again.


Dickson, Ingerfool, and JohnnyDope are blood relatives.


--
I feel no need to explain my politics to stupid right-wingers.
After all, I am *not* the Jackass Whisperer.

On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:31:42 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote:

On Thursday, 11 December 2014 12:18:57 UTC-4, John H wrote:
On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 8:39:18 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 4:07:58 PM UTC-5, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:03:23 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/14 4:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...target shooting today:

http://tinyurl.com/q7lrxba


Holes at left from my .22LR S&W AR-15/22. Just ordinary LRN ammo, 40
grain. Sighting in scope from the top to the bottom, where I got a two
shot group of a hair more than an inch. 100 yards.

Holes on right from my 1892 Win carbine in .357 MAG. Already sighted in
with the red dot for 100 yards, so the two shot group was what I
expected to see. Just regular ball ammo.



Whoops...this is the back side of the chunk of cardboard. The other side
is just plain brown and the holes don't "pop" as well visually.

Wow. That's extremely impressive.

WAFJ!


Ff sake herring, krause poked those holes through with his hand.
krause couldn't even see the ****ing target without a 10 power scope.

100 yards....what a joke.

Hey - you're filtered (except on Google Groups), but - that was funny! Others are thinking the same thing!

Hey johnny..
what are you doing...conversing with the likes of Dickson?
Oh, I see...it's 'do as I say...not as I do' again.

Yup...that was exceptional. But, he actually said something really
funny - and probably true.

But, you're right. Ignoring him is definitely the way to go.
--

"The modern definition of 'ingrained racist' is someone who's winning an argument
with a couple liberals."

(Thanks, Luddite!)

On 12/11/2014 11:32 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/11/14 11:23 AM, John H wrote:
On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 11:05:45 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/10/14 6:36 PM, Califbill wrote:
BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 12/10/14 4:08 PM, Toad Gig wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:03:23 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/14 4:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...target shooting today:

http://tinyurl.com/q7lrxba


Holes at left from my .22LR S&W AR-15/22. Just ordinary LRN
ammo, 40
grain. Sighting in scope from the top to the bottom, where I
got a two
shot group of a hair more than an inch. 100 yards.

Holes on right from my 1892 Win carbine in .357 MAG. Already
sighted in
with the red dot for 100 yards, so the two shot group was what I
expected to see. Just regular ball ammo.



Whoops...this is the back side of the chunk of cardboard. The
other side
is just plain brown and the holes don't "pop" as well
visually.

Wow. That's extremely impressive.

WAFJ!


Yeah, JohnnyTrash, if only you could see a small target at 100
yards,
eh?

What's the matter you cant hold a 1 inch group?

Nobody believe's you were shooting 100 yards.

And with a scope? Either crappy firearm, or crappy shooter.



snerk How's your shooting with a non-target .22LR firearm at 100
yards, Bilious? I got on the paper with my first shot. Oh, and no
scope
on the carbine...just a 3 MOA red dot.




I shoot that well with my 223 AR and no red dot or scope.

Bull****. You aren't shooting 1" groups at 100 yards on an ordinary AR15
with metal sights only. Bull****, bull****, bull****.
--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Toad, just for the record, were you using two hands or one? I know
better than to ask if the rifle was supported. Are you sure you showed
us the back side. Those holes look pretty clean for being on the back
side of cardboard. (Not that I'm doubting anything you say, mind you.)

BTW, do you own round pencils or hexagonal pencils? Just askin'.


The muzzle ends of the rifles were supported on my shooting bag.

You have a man bag?

On Thursday, December 11, 2014 11:33:30 AM UTC-5, F*O*A*D wrote:

Dickson, Ingerfool, and JohnnyDope are blood relatives.
..

And donnie is your dicklicker boy.

On Thursday, December 11, 2014 11:31:43 AM UTC-5, True North wrote:

Hey johnny..
what are you doing...conversing with the likes of Dickson?
Oh, I see...it's 'do as I say...not as I do' again.

Go watch some more leather-clad gay biker movies, dicklicker.

On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 19:04:04 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 4:12:17 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/10/14 4:08 PM, Toad Gig wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:03:23 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/14 4:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...target shooting today:

http://tinyurl.com/q7lrxba


Holes at left from my .22LR S&W AR-15/22. Just ordinary LRN ammo, 40
grain. Sighting in scope from the top to the bottom, where I got a two
shot group of a hair more than an inch. 100 yards.

Holes on right from my 1892 Win carbine in .357 MAG. Already sighted in
with the red dot for 100 yards, so the two shot group was what I
expected to see. Just regular ball ammo.



Whoops...this is the back side of the chunk of cardboard. The other side
is just plain brown and the holes don't "pop" as well visually.

Wow. That's extremely impressive.

WAFJ!


Yeah, JohnnyTrash, if only you could see a small target at 100 yards,
eh?



--
I feel no need to explain my politics to stupid right-wingers.
After all, I am *not* the Jackass Whisperer.

Toad, I fairly regularly, on a good day, hit drives in excess of 200 yards. ( That sounds like bragging, but it's really not.) The point is that I can follow that little bugger, all 1 5/16ths inches of it.

Now don't you feel like a silly little toad, Toad?

Ouch! Harry is bitch slapped again.

===

I've come to the conclusion that he's actually a masochist who no
doubt enjoys it, probably as sub-concious atonement for his early
misdeeds.

It would take a whole team of shrinks to put that Humpty Dumpty back
together again (along with all the king's horses and all the king's
men).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oKreL1jvkg

I sort of envision Harry as looking a bit like Humpty Dumpty.

On Thursday, December 11, 2014 11:45:42 PM UTC-5, Wayne. B wrote:

I sort of envision Harry as looking a bit like Humpty Dumpty.

.....with all the pustules....don't for get the pustules !!

On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:42:00 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 19:04:04 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 4:12:17 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/10/14 4:08 PM, Toad Gig wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:03:23 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/14 4:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...target shooting today:

http://tinyurl.com/q7lrxba


Holes at left from my .22LR S&W AR-15/22. Just ordinary LRN ammo, 40
grain. Sighting in scope from the top to the bottom, where I got a two
shot group of a hair more than an inch. 100 yards.

Holes on right from my 1892 Win carbine in .357 MAG. Already sighted in
with the red dot for 100 yards, so the two shot group was what I
expected to see. Just regular ball ammo.



Whoops...this is the back side of the chunk of cardboard. The other side
is just plain brown and the holes don't "pop" as well visually.

Wow. That's extremely impressive.

WAFJ!


Yeah, JohnnyTrash, if only you could see a small target at 100 yards,
eh?



--
I feel no need to explain my politics to stupid right-wingers.
After all, I am *not* the Jackass Whisperer.

Toad, I fairly regularly, on a good day, hit drives in excess of 200 yards. ( That sounds like bragging, but it's really not.) The point is that I can follow that little bugger, all 1 5/16ths inches of it.

Now don't you feel like a silly little toad, Toad?

Ouch! Harry is bitch slapped again.

===

I've come to the conclusion that he's actually a masochist who no
doubt enjoys it, probably as sub-concious atonement for his early
misdeeds.

It would take a whole team of shrinks to put that Humpty Dumpty back
together again (along with all the king's horses and all the king's
men).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oKreL1jvkg

I sort of envision Harry as looking a bit like Humpty Dumpty.

Remarkable resemblance.
--

"The modern definition of 'ingrained racist' is someone who's winning an argument
with a couple liberals."

(Thanks, Luddite!)