On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 09:57:49 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 09:50:47 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

From a raping, baby killing, racist asshole.

===

Hair wee call you that ?

I think I should have added 'cunningly linguistic' in there, but that
wasn't really from him.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/8/15 12:18 PM, Califbill wrote:
Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:02:32 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:


Harry has you guys pegged. Wayne, Herring, Jim, and whoever I forgot.
One post by him, with no particular target, gets your panties in a wad.
Gets you foaming at the mouth
I don't care what Harry says about religion - or anything else really.
But he sure has you all on a leash, and barking.

Actually, very few here think much of Harry. He apparently thought
that a couple weeks of 'niceness' would overcome his past behavior. He
was wrong. By throwing out another anti-religion post, he expressed
his desire to continue the crap.

One would not expect you, et al, to see that.

From a raping, baby killing, racist asshole.

Actually harry stealing from someone else again. Luddite stated he was
studying Psyche and next thing this years of crap on newsgroups by Harry is
part of his study. Unbelievable.



I'm sorry, Bill, but I can't parse your post. Luddite and I are not
conducting the same "experiment."

Admit was poorly written. Realized it as I hit send. But anybody with
half a brain could parse the post. You now claiming to be running a long
term experiment of your own on Usenet. Ha!

On 1/8/2015 10:13 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/8/15 12:18 PM, Califbill wrote:
Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:02:32 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:


Harry has you guys pegged. Wayne, Herring, Jim, and whoever I forgot.
One post by him, with no particular target, gets your panties in a wad.
Gets you foaming at the mouth
I don't care what Harry says about religion - or anything else really.
But he sure has you all on a leash, and barking.

Actually, very few here think much of Harry. He apparently thought
that a couple weeks of 'niceness' would overcome his past behavior. He
was wrong. By throwing out another anti-religion post, he expressed
his desire to continue the crap.

One would not expect you, et al, to see that.

From a raping, baby killing, racist asshole.

Actually harry stealing from someone else again. Luddite stated he was
studying Psyche and next thing this years of crap on newsgroups by Harry is
part of his study. Unbelievable.



I'm sorry, Bill, but I can't parse your post. Luddite and I are not
conducting the same "experiment."

Admit was poorly written. Realized it as I hit send. But anybody with
half a brain could parse the post. You now claiming to be running a long
term experiment of your own on Usenet. Ha!


He's just a drunken fool...

On 1/8/15 10:13 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/8/15 12:18 PM, Califbill wrote:
Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:02:32 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:


Harry has you guys pegged. Wayne, Herring, Jim, and whoever I forgot.
One post by him, with no particular target, gets your panties in a wad.
Gets you foaming at the mouth
I don't care what Harry says about religion - or anything else really.
But he sure has you all on a leash, and barking.

Actually, very few here think much of Harry. He apparently thought
that a couple weeks of 'niceness' would overcome his past behavior. He
was wrong. By throwing out another anti-religion post, he expressed
his desire to continue the crap.

One would not expect you, et al, to see that.

From a raping, baby killing, racist asshole.

Actually harry stealing from someone else again. Luddite stated he was
studying Psyche and next thing this years of crap on newsgroups by Harry is
part of his study. Unbelievable.



I'm sorry, Bill, but I can't parse your post. Luddite and I are not
conducting the same "experiment."

Admit was poorly written. Realized it as I hit send. But anybody with
half a brain could parse the post. You now claiming to be running a long
term experiment of your own on Usenet. Ha!



No, I made no such claim. Actually, the "experiment" is pretty much
over. Part of my hypothesis was that there were at least a half dozen or
so posters here who couldn't/wouldn't stop personally insulting other
posters, no matter what. That part was proved correct. Another part was
that even if I stopped personally insulting other posters, the insulting
by others would continue. That part was proved correct. There are a few
other parts that include my guesses as to *who* would continue to
personally insult other posters, and that part has proved correct, too.

I wonder if I can get an NSF grant to formalize this study?

On 1/9/2015 6:24 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/8/15 10:13 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/8/15 12:18 PM, Califbill wrote:
Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:02:32 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:


Harry has you guys pegged. Wayne, Herring, Jim, and whoever I
forgot.
One post by him, with no particular target, gets your panties in a
wad.
Gets you foaming at the mouth
I don't care what Harry says about religion - or anything else
really.
But he sure has you all on a leash, and barking.

Actually, very few here think much of Harry. He apparently thought
that a couple weeks of 'niceness' would overcome his past behavior. He
was wrong. By throwing out another anti-religion post, he expressed
his desire to continue the crap.

One would not expect you, et al, to see that.

From a raping, baby killing, racist asshole.

Actually harry stealing from someone else again. Luddite stated he
was
studying Psyche and next thing this years of crap on newsgroups by
Harry is
part of his study. Unbelievable.



I'm sorry, Bill, but I can't parse your post. Luddite and I are not
conducting the same "experiment."

Admit was poorly written. Realized it as I hit send. But anybody with
half a brain could parse the post. You now claiming to be running a long
term experiment of your own on Usenet. Ha!



No, I made no such claim. Actually, the "experiment" is pretty much
over. Part of my hypothesis was that there were at least a half dozen or
so posters here who couldn't/wouldn't stop personally insulting other
posters, no matter what. That part was proved correct. Another part was
that even if I stopped personally insulting other posters, the insulting
by others would continue. That part was proved correct. There are a few
other parts that include my guesses as to *who* would continue to
personally insult other posters, and that part has proved correct, too.

I wonder if I can get an NSF grant to formalize this study?

Don't you have anything better to do?

--


I don't need anger management. I just need people to stop ****ing me off!
Respectfully submitted by Justan

On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 6:24:33 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:

No, I made no such claim. Actually, the "experiment" is pretty much
over. Part of my hypothesis was that there were at least a half dozen or
so posters here who couldn't/wouldn't stop personally insulting other
posters, no matter what. That part was proved correct. Another part was
that even if I stopped personally insulting other posters, the insulting
by others would continue. That part was proved correct. There are a few
other parts that include my guesses as to *who* would continue to
personally insult other posters, and that part has proved correct, too.

Your numbers don't add up. Ignoring slammed, we have:

Don nipping at John's and Scot's heels.
Scot and Justan nipping at yours.
Luddite throwing out an occasional jab at John.
You and John being equally, but very mildly, snarky to each other.
Wayne calling you out on the obvious.
Maybe one or two other posters who rarely post anything, but when they do it's a snide comment.

OK, maybe it is around six. But since you claim that you don't read every post, skipping over many, your data set and research is incomplete and flawed. :-)

One thing is for sure... an unintentional result is the proof that you are one of the greatest drivers of the animosity that exists in this NG. During your "experiment", the overall tone of the posts greatly improved. And you proved that you can't wipe out 10 years of bad behavior with one week of relatively good behavior.

On 1/9/2015 10:37 AM, wrote:
On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 6:24:33 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:

No, I made no such claim. Actually, the "experiment" is pretty much
over. Part of my hypothesis was that there were at least a half dozen or
so posters here who couldn't/wouldn't stop personally insulting other
posters, no matter what. That part was proved correct. Another part was
that even if I stopped personally insulting other posters, the insulting
by others would continue. That part was proved correct. There are a few
other parts that include my guesses as to *who* would continue to
personally insult other posters, and that part has proved correct, too.

Your numbers don't add up. Ignoring slammed, we have:

Don nipping at John's and Scot's heels.
Scot and Justan nipping at yours.
Luddite throwing out an occasional jab at John.
You and John being equally, but very mildly, snarky to each other.
Wayne calling you out on the obvious.
Maybe one or two other posters who rarely post anything, but when they do it's a snide comment.

OK, maybe it is around six. But since you claim that you don't read every post, skipping over many, your data set and research is incomplete and flawed. :-)

One thing is for sure... an unintentional result is the proof that you are one of the greatest drivers of the animosity that exists in this NG. During your "experiment", the overall tone of the posts greatly improved. And you proved that you can't wipe out 10 years of bad behavior with one week of relatively good behavior.


That pretty much sums it up.

--


I don't need anger management. I just need people to stop ****ing me off!
Respectfully submitted by Justan

On 1/9/15 10:37 AM, wrote:
On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 6:24:33 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:

No, I made no such claim. Actually, the "experiment" is pretty much
over. Part of my hypothesis was that there were at least a half dozen or
so posters here who couldn't/wouldn't stop personally insulting other
posters, no matter what. That part was proved correct. Another part was
that even if I stopped personally insulting other posters, the insulting
by others would continue. That part was proved correct. There are a few
other parts that include my guesses as to *who* would continue to
personally insult other posters, and that part has proved correct, too.

Your numbers don't add up. Ignoring slammed, we have:

Don nipping at John's and Scot's heels.
Scot and Justan nipping at yours.
Luddite throwing out an occasional jab at John.
You and John being equally, but very mildly, snarky to each other.
Wayne calling you out on the obvious.
Maybe one or two other posters who rarely post anything, but when they do it's a snide comment.

OK, maybe it is around six. But since you claim that you don't read every post, skipping over many, your data set and research is incomplete and flawed. :-)

One thing is for sure... an unintentional result is the proof that you are one of the greatest drivers of the animosity that exists in this NG. During your "experiment", the overall tone of the posts greatly improved. And you proved that you can't wipe out 10 years of bad behavior with one week of relatively good behavior.


My experiment showed that for the last three weeks or so, without my
making a single derogatory post about other posters here, there were and
are at least a half dozen posters whose snarly behavior continued.

It was a limited experiment, and it proved what I suspected.

On 1/9/2015 11:51 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/9/15 10:37 AM, wrote:
On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 6:24:33 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:

No, I made no such claim. Actually, the "experiment" is pretty much
over. Part of my hypothesis was that there were at least a half dozen or
so posters here who couldn't/wouldn't stop personally insulting other
posters, no matter what. That part was proved correct. Another part was
that even if I stopped personally insulting other posters, the insulting
by others would continue. That part was proved correct. There are a few
other parts that include my guesses as to *who* would continue to
personally insult other posters, and that part has proved correct, too.

Your numbers don't add up. Ignoring slammed, we have:

Don nipping at John's and Scot's heels.
Scot and Justan nipping at yours.
Luddite throwing out an occasional jab at John.
You and John being equally, but very mildly, snarky to each other.
Wayne calling you out on the obvious.
Maybe one or two other posters who rarely post anything, but when they
do it's a snide comment.

OK, maybe it is around six. But since you claim that you don't read
every post, skipping over many, your data set and research is
incomplete and flawed. :-)

One thing is for sure... an unintentional result is the proof that you
are one of the greatest drivers of the animosity that exists in this
NG. During your "experiment", the overall tone of the posts greatly
improved. And you proved that you can't wipe out 10 years of bad
behavior with one week of relatively good behavior.


My experiment showed that for the last three weeks or so, without my
making a single derogatory post about other posters here, there were and
are at least a half dozen posters whose snarly behavior continued.

It was a limited experiment, and it proved what I suspected.

Yeah, that nobody here cares that you are being nice for a week, and you
deserve no respect from anybody here? Yup, you nailed it.

On 1/9/2015 11:51 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/9/15 10:37 AM, wrote:
On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 6:24:33 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:

No, I made no such claim. Actually, the "experiment" is pretty much
over. Part of my hypothesis was that there were at least a half dozen or
so posters here who couldn't/wouldn't stop personally insulting other
posters, no matter what. That part was proved correct. Another part was
that even if I stopped personally insulting other posters, the insulting
by others would continue. That part was proved correct. There are a few
other parts that include my guesses as to *who* would continue to
personally insult other posters, and that part has proved correct, too.

Your numbers don't add up. Ignoring slammed, we have:

Don nipping at John's and Scot's heels.
Scot and Justan nipping at yours.
Luddite throwing out an occasional jab at John.
You and John being equally, but very mildly, snarky to each other.
Wayne calling you out on the obvious.
Maybe one or two other posters who rarely post anything, but when they
do it's a snide comment.

OK, maybe it is around six. But since you claim that you don't read
every post, skipping over many, your data set and research is
incomplete and flawed. :-)

One thing is for sure... an unintentional result is the proof that you
are one of the greatest drivers of the animosity that exists in this
NG. During your "experiment", the overall tone of the posts greatly
improved. And you proved that you can't wipe out 10 years of bad
behavior with one week of relatively good behavior.


My experiment showed that for the last three weeks or so, without my
making a single derogatory post about other posters here, there were and
are at least a half dozen posters whose snarly behavior continued.

It was a limited experiment, and it proved what I suspected.


Ingrained rather than thoughtful behavior.