Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, January 25, 2015 at 12:28:20 PM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/25/15 2:51 PM, Tim wrote: Not rare??? Out of some 17 million Negants built, less than 200,000 were sniper rifles. That's rare! Now consider those especially with all matching numbers which have survived all this time ( not the mock ups and re-arsenaled parts guns) that makes this item even rarer yet. Wow. One of 200,000! Rare. But still an ugly rifle. To each his own. -- Proud to be a Liberal. Your're the one that said they weren't rare. Harry, you don't have to attempt to save face with comments like the one you just made to my response. |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/25/2015 4:23 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, January 25, 2015 at 12:28:20 PM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/25/15 2:51 PM, Tim wrote: Not rare??? Out of some 17 million Negants built, less than 200,000 were sniper rifles. That's rare! Now consider those especially with all matching numbers which have survived all this time ( not the mock ups and re-arsenaled parts guns) that makes this item even rarer yet. Wow. One of 200,000! Rare. But still an ugly rifle. To each his own. -- Proud to be a Liberal. Your're the one that said they weren't rare. Harry, you don't have to attempt to save face with comments like the one you just made to my response. I don't know anything about collectable guns or rifles but 200,000 made doesn't sound particularly rare to me. Need to ask Rick Harrison on Pawn Stars. :-) Heck, in 1960 only 2,846 Edsels were made and the total made for all years ('58, '59 and '60) is far less than 200,000. They aren't really "collectable" either. |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 1/25/2015 4:23 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, January 25, 2015 at 12:28:20 PM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/25/15 2:51 PM, Tim wrote: Not rare??? Out of some 17 million Negants built, less than 200,000 were sniper rifles. That's rare! Now consider those especially with all matching numbers which have survived all this time ( not the mock ups and re-arsenaled parts guns) that makes this item even rarer yet. Wow. One of 200,000! Rare. But still an ugly rifle. To each his own. -- Proud to be a Liberal. Your're the one that said they weren't rare. Harry, you don't have to attempt to save face with comments like the one you just made to my response. I don't know anything about collectable guns or rifles but 200,000 made doesn't sound particularly rare to me. Need to ask Rick Harrison on Pawn Stars. :-) Heck, in 1960 only 2,846 Edsels were made and the total made for all years ('58, '59 and '60) is far less than 200,000. They aren't really "collectable" either. 1 of 1000 or 1 of 5000, maybe. I have a pair of unfired hand engraved revolvers with consecutive serial numbers that are collectible because of the engravings, unfired condition, and serial numbers. Otherwise, they're not rare. But they are worth a lot more than I paid for them. -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:42:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 1/25/15 3:20 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:07:10 -0500, Keyser the Geezer mumbled: Rifle was made during WWII in the Urals, more likely used to kill German soldiers. Pretty common rifle, not collector quality, and if it ain't mine, it's dreck. Well, if its yours, it must have factory dimples. === My Ruger III most certainly does. You probably got yours in the bargain basement. |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, January 25, 2015 at 1:36:11 PM UTC-8, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/25/2015 4:23 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, January 25, 2015 at 12:28:20 PM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/25/15 2:51 PM, Tim wrote: Not rare??? Out of some 17 million Negants built, less than 200,000 were sniper rifles. That's rare! Now consider those especially with all matching numbers which have survived all this time ( not the mock ups and re-arsenaled parts guns) that makes this item even rarer yet. Wow. One of 200,000! Rare. But still an ugly rifle. To each his own. -- Proud to be a Liberal. Your're the one that said they weren't rare. Harry, you don't have to attempt to save face with comments like the one you just made to my response.. I don't know anything about collectable guns or rifles but 200,000 made doesn't sound particularly rare to me. Need to ask Rick Harrison on Pawn Stars. :-) Heck, in 1960 only 2,846 Edsels were made and the total made for all years ('58, '59 and '60) is far less than 200,000. They aren't really "collectable" either. 120,000 out of 17,000,000 The only thing that makes any item 'collectible' is relative to people that for what ever reason want to collect them. "Need to ask Rick Harrison on Pawn Stars. :-)" Rick wouldn't know. He'd have to call up an expert buddy of his who just 'happened to be in town' |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/25/15 5:08 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:42:45 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/25/15 3:20 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:07:10 -0500, Keyser the Geezer mumbled: Rifle was made during WWII in the Urals, more likely used to kill German soldiers. Pretty common rifle, not collector quality, and if it ain't mine, it's dreck. Well, if its yours, it must have factory dimples. === My Ruger III most certainly does. You probably got yours in the bargain basement. It may have, but it isn't likely Ruger did the dimpling, nor is it likely Ruger dimpled the large number of Mark III's you claimed. And why would the dimpling be necessary, since you can buy any number of muzzle brakes that fit over the muzzle of the barrel and attach with a screw where the front sight goes, such as the one on the photo you attached? And some of the brakes are available with a drilled and tapped hole to relocate the front sight. Further, Ruger and its distributors have offer Mark III's with threaded barrels for some years. -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 17:08:54 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:42:45 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/25/15 3:20 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:07:10 -0500, Keyser the Geezer mumbled: Rifle was made during WWII in the Urals, more likely used to kill German soldiers. Pretty common rifle, not collector quality, and if it ain't mine, it's dreck. Well, if its yours, it must have factory dimples. === My Ruger III most certainly does. You probably got yours in the bargain basement. He bragged about his 'local price' but won't give the dealer's name. Wonder why that is? Hmmm? -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of certain gun owners causes problems. |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/26/2015 11:01 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 17:08:54 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:42:45 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/25/15 3:20 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:07:10 -0500, Keyser the Geezer mumbled: Rifle was made during WWII in the Urals, more likely used to kill German soldiers. Pretty common rifle, not collector quality, and if it ain't mine, it's dreck. Well, if its yours, it must have factory dimples. === My Ruger III most certainly does. You probably got yours in the bargain basement. He bragged about his 'local price' but won't give the dealer's name. Wonder why that is? Hmmm? Man, you won't give up, will you? He's not going to tell you so you can play Dick Tracy instead of Sheriff John. Or maybe it's just the Clara in you. |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:32:20 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 1/26/2015 11:01 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 17:08:54 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:42:45 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/25/15 3:20 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:07:10 -0500, Keyser the Geezer mumbled: Rifle was made during WWII in the Urals, more likely used to kill German soldiers. Pretty common rifle, not collector quality, and if it ain't mine, it's dreck. Well, if its yours, it must have factory dimples. === My Ruger III most certainly does. You probably got yours in the bargain basement. He bragged about his 'local price' but won't give the dealer's name. Wonder why that is? Hmmm? Man, you won't give up, will you? He's not going to tell you so you can play Dick Tracy instead of Sheriff John. Or maybe it's just the Clara in you. Poor Harry needs all the help he can get, eh? Someone told me recently that there where a couple things I could do regarding posts I didn't like. One was not to read them. Can't remember the other, and too lazy to look it up. Perhaps you'd be kind enough to help? -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of certain gun owners causes problems. |
#20
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:18:37 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
On Sunday, January 25, 2015 at 1:36:11 PM UTC-8, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/25/2015 4:23 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, January 25, 2015 at 12:28:20 PM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/25/15 2:51 PM, Tim wrote: Not rare??? Out of some 17 million Negants built, less than 200,000 were sniper rifles. That's rare! Now consider those especially with all matching numbers which have survived all this time ( not the mock ups and re-arsenaled parts guns) that makes this item even rarer yet. Wow. One of 200,000! Rare. But still an ugly rifle. To each his own. -- Proud to be a Liberal. Your're the one that said they weren't rare. Harry, you don't have to attempt to save face with comments like the one you just made to my response. I don't know anything about collectable guns or rifles but 200,000 made doesn't sound particularly rare to me. Need to ask Rick Harrison on Pawn Stars. :-) Heck, in 1960 only 2,846 Edsels were made and the total made for all years ('58, '59 and '60) is far less than 200,000. They aren't really "collectable" either. 120,000 out of 17,000,000 The only thing that makes any item 'collectible' is relative to people that for what ever reason want to collect them. "Need to ask Rick Harrison on Pawn Stars. :-)" Rick wouldn't know. He'd have to call up an expert buddy of his who just 'happened to be in town' Tim, I could not give a **** less what Krause and Eriksson think of this rifle. I'm happy with the purchase, and I'll have a lot of fun shooting it. I'm sure a grandkid will have fun with it also. It won't end up being a 'closet queen', and I don't give a rat's ass about it appreciating in value. 'Appreciation' is why go made mutual funds and gold. -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of certain gun owners causes problems. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hearing on global warming cancelled due to cold. | ASA | |||
Boat building, carpentry, and hearing | Boat Building | |||
Time limit for hearing (not filing) protest | General | |||
Time limit for hearing (not filing) protest | General | |||
Money Saved by Not Training! | General |