On 3/12/2015 12:29 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/12/15 12:22 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:42:22 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 3/12/2015 11:08 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:55:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

I've been to the range
twice this month so far.

===

Don't they have any membership standards?

We bounce one or two asshats every year from our group.

It would be difficult to measure Harry by standards used to judge normal
men.

Harry's already told us how much better than the cops he shoots.



Wow! Wayne, FlaJim, and Col. Klink...Three Right-Wing Turds on a Log.

Don't feel so outnumbered and over powered. Come back with something
smart. Take your time, we'll wait.

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

DitzyDan spews...
"Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. *A stainless S&W .500 magnum. *I
ordered the 6.5" barrel."


Is that 32 guns you own, Ditzy.
That sure must be some shortcoming you're over compensating for.
How do y'all do it on a counterman's salary?

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:38:25 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

DitzyDan spews...
"Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. *A stainless S&W .500 magnum. *I
ordered the 6.5" barrel."


Is that 32 guns you own, Ditzy.
That sure must be some shortcoming you're over compensating for.
How do y'all do it on a counterman's salary?

Don, you are so far out in left field that I doubt you could see the catcher even if
it were Harry.

And, have you considered the possibility that the #32 refers only to revolvers?
Perhaps

From where did you get the 'counterman' nonsense?

You should really consider thinking before you post.
--

Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner
*behavior* causes problems.

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:20:56 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:55:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

My point about the .500 S&W is perfectly valid. Quick followup shots
are a bitch, and if you miss the bear, the bear is going to have you for
lunch. You disagree, eh?

Define "quick". I am sure a guy who shoots one regularly could get
back down in far less than a second.

A guy who shoots one regularly probably wouldn't need to worry about 'quick followup
shots'.

[NB: Harry does not fall into that category.]
--

Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner
*behavior* causes problems.

wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:33:32 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:20:56 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:55:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

My point about the .500 S&W is perfectly valid. Quick followup shots
are a bitch, and if you miss the bear, the bear is going to have you for
lunch. You disagree, eh?

Define "quick". I am sure a guy who shoots one regularly could get
back down in far less than a second.

A guy who shoots one regularly probably wouldn't need to worry about 'quick followup
shots'.

[NB: Harry does not fall into that category.]

If you are going to buy commercial ammo, you won't be able to afford
to shoot this a lot. It looks like the ammo is $2 a round. OTOH the
bullets are about a quarter each in quantity of 500 (at Natchez) so
the reloaders really make out. Powder and primers add another nickel
or so.

$2 will buy about six quality FMJ rounds in .357 Mag. But of course we
don't have griz like they do in SE Florida 😃

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

On 3/12/2015 5:03 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:33:32 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:20:56 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:55:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

My point about the .500 S&W is perfectly valid. Quick followup shots
are a bitch, and if you miss the bear, the bear is going to have you for
lunch. You disagree, eh?

Define "quick". I am sure a guy who shoots one regularly could get
back down in far less than a second.

A guy who shoots one regularly probably wouldn't need to worry about 'quick followup
shots'.

[NB: Harry does not fall into that category.]

If you are going to buy commercial ammo, you won't be able to afford
to shoot this a lot. It looks like the ammo is $2 a round. OTOH the
bullets are about a quarter each in quantity of 500 (at Natchez) so
the reloaders really make out. Powder and primers add another nickel
or so.

$2 will buy about six quality FMJ rounds in .357 Mag. But of course we
don't have griz like they do in SE Florida 😃

Griz in Florida?

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

On 3/12/15 2:33 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:20:56 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:55:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

My point about the .500 S&W is perfectly valid. Quick followup shots
are a bitch, and if you miss the bear, the bear is going to have you for
lunch. You disagree, eh?

Define "quick". I am sure a guy who shoots one regularly could get
back down in far less than a second.

A guy who shoots one regularly probably wouldn't need to worry about 'quick followup
shots'.

[NB: Harry does not fall into that category.]


Not to worry, Colonel Klink: with your list of ailments, surgeries, and
vision problems, you probably should stick to your Daisy BB rifle.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

On 3/12/15 2:20 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:55:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

My point about the .500 S&W is perfectly valid. Quick followup shots
are a bitch, and if you miss the bear, the bear is going to have you for
lunch. You disagree, eh?

Define "quick". I am sure a guy who shoots one regularly could get
back down in far less than a second.


Who shoots one of those cannons "regularly"? I'd bet on the grizzly bear
and, of course, that is such a distinct possibility in SE Florida.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

On 3/12/15 2:16 PM, John H. wrote:


You should really consider thinking before you post.


I'd suggest you follow your own advice, but, then, there is no evidence
here you are capable of doing so, eh, Colonel Klink?

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:53:41 -0400, Someone
wrote:

Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. A stainless S&W .500 magnum. I
ordered the 6.5" barrel.

http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/w...layErrorView_Y

How does that compare to the desert eagle .50
(Yeah I know I could just google something up)

I have both and will be shooting them early next week. I'll let you know.

The .50AE is a much smaller cartridge. 300 grain vs 440 in the magnum.