MSNBC is reporting that the author of "Clinton Cash" is now preparing a
similar expose' of Jeb Bush and his financial dealings. It is due
for release later this summer and is expected to be damming.

So, when he comes down hard on Jeb with accusations will Harry still
consider him to be a "right-wing" nut with no investigative credibility?

Meanwhile, the allegations regarding the Clinton Foundation and
Hillary's possible "bending" of rules is growing. Newsweek has
released possible connections with Russia involving uranium deals
resulting in a $500K speaking engagement for hubby Bill as well as
several undisclosed foreign "donations" that were supposed to be
reported while Hillary was Secretary of State.

On 4/23/2015 6:24 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

MSNBC is reporting that the author of "Clinton Cash" is now preparing a
similar expose' of Jeb Bush and his financial dealings. It is due
for release later this summer and is expected to be damming.

So, when he comes down hard on Jeb with accusations will Harry still
consider him to be a "right-wing" nut with no investigative credibility?

Meanwhile, the allegations regarding the Clinton Foundation and
Hillary's possible "bending" of rules is growing. Newsweek has
released possible connections with Russia involving uranium deals
resulting in a $500K speaking engagement for hubby Bill as well as
several undisclosed foreign "donations" that were supposed to be
reported while Hillary was Secretary of State.


What difference does it make. Her servers contain no damning evidence.

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

On 4/23/15 6:24 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

MSNBC is reporting that the author of "Clinton Cash" is now preparing a
similar expose' of Jeb Bush and his financial dealings. It is due
for release later this summer and is expected to be damming.

So, when he comes down hard on Jeb with accusations will Harry still
consider him to be a "right-wing" nut with no investigative credibility?

Your "hero" author typically has to publish all sorts of retractions and
is considered a "pants on fire" writer.;



Meanwhile, the allegations regarding the Clinton Foundation and
Hillary's possible "bending" of rules is growing. Newsweek has
released possible connections with Russia involving uranium deals
resulting in a $500K speaking engagement for hubby Bill as well as
several undisclosed foreign "donations" that were supposed to be
reported while Hillary was Secretary of State.

Y-A-W-N

From the Newsweek piece:

"American political campaigns are barred from accepting foreign
donations. But foreigners may give to foundations in the United States.
In the days since Mrs. Clinton announced her candidacy for president,
the Clinton Foundation has announced changes meant to quell longstanding
concerns about potential conflicts of interest in such donations; it has
limited donations from foreign governments, with many, like Russia’s,
barred from giving to all but its health care initiatives."

Next, in your ongoing series of attack posts against Mrs. Clinton?

In article , says...


What exactly are you claiming Hillary did that was illegal? Please be
specific.

What difference does that make to a "political nutcase?"