The Can...
 

There probably are a couple of posters here who are interested in seeing
a can mounted on a Ruger Mk. III.

http://tinyurl.com/qhq5wyj

It's a SilencerCo "Sparrow" silencer. The pistol is a bull barrel Ruger
Mk. III 512. I sent it off to Volquartsen to have the barrel threaded,
and for installation of the "full" Volquartsen modification kit.

For now, I'm using CCI "Standard" .22LR ammo, a round that is subsonic
and has enough "oomph" to cycle the pistol and my .22LR semi-auto rifle.
CCI's "Quiet" ammo doesn't have enough of a charge to cycle these firearms.

There are some name-brand "suppressor" rounds out there, supposedly, but
I've only found one source for CCI's rounds, and they are grossly
overpriced.

The loudest noise you hear when firing these rounds is the sound of the
firearms' bolt cycling.

When I applied for the necessary federal tax stamp, I was advised to use
a trust on the forms, because for several unknown reasons, the ATF
approves "trust" applications quicker than "individual" applications.
From what I have read on various firearms sites, that is indeed the
case, but no one seems to know why. When you get your stamp back, it is
"mounted" on a form. The stamp is greenish blue or blueish green, and
the ATF'er who processed it writes the serial number of the silencer on
the stamp, dates it, and initials it. You have to have the stamp or a
photocopy of it on you when you are out with the silencer.

The Can...
 

On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 10:00:37 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


There probably are a couple of posters here who are interested in seeing
a can mounted on a Ruger Mk. III.

http://tinyurl.com/qhq5wyj

It's a SilencerCo "Sparrow" silencer. The pistol is a bull barrel Ruger
Mk. III 512. I sent it off to Volquartsen to have the barrel threaded,
and for installation of the "full" Volquartsen modification kit.

For now, I'm using CCI "Standard" .22LR ammo, a round that is subsonic
and has enough "oomph" to cycle the pistol and my .22LR semi-auto rifle.
CCI's "Quiet" ammo doesn't have enough of a charge to cycle these firearms.

There are some name-brand "suppressor" rounds out there, supposedly, but
I've only found one source for CCI's rounds, and they are grossly
overpriced.

The loudest noise you hear when firing these rounds is the sound of the
firearms' bolt cycling.

When I applied for the necessary federal tax stamp, I was advised to use
a trust on the forms, because for several unknown reasons, the ATF
approves "trust" applications quicker than "individual" applications.
From what I have read on various firearms sites, that is indeed the
case, but no one seems to know why. When you get your stamp back, it is
"mounted" on a form. The stamp is greenish blue or blueish green, and
the ATF'er who processed it writes the serial number of the silencer on
the stamp, dates it, and initials it. You have to have the stamp or a
photocopy of it on you when you are out with the silencer.

The question - who does the photo and the gun belong to?

Would you have us believe it's yours?

Good laugh.
--

Guns don't cause problems.
Gun owner behavior causes problems.

The Can...
 

On 6/3/15 1:33 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 10:00:37 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


There probably are a couple of posters here who are interested in seeing
a can mounted on a Ruger Mk. III.

http://tinyurl.com/qhq5wyj

It's a SilencerCo "Sparrow" silencer. The pistol is a bull barrel Ruger
Mk. III 512. I sent it off to Volquartsen to have the barrel threaded,
and for installation of the "full" Volquartsen modification kit.

For now, I'm using CCI "Standard" .22LR ammo, a round that is subsonic
and has enough "oomph" to cycle the pistol and my .22LR semi-auto rifle.
CCI's "Quiet" ammo doesn't have enough of a charge to cycle these firearms.

There are some name-brand "suppressor" rounds out there, supposedly, but
I've only found one source for CCI's rounds, and they are grossly
overpriced.

The loudest noise you hear when firing these rounds is the sound of the
firearms' bolt cycling.

When I applied for the necessary federal tax stamp, I was advised to use
a trust on the forms, because for several unknown reasons, the ATF
approves "trust" applications quicker than "individual" applications.
From what I have read on various firearms sites, that is indeed the
case, but no one seems to know why. When you get your stamp back, it is
"mounted" on a form. The stamp is greenish blue or blueish green, and
the ATF'er who processed it writes the serial number of the silencer on
the stamp, dates it, and initials it. You have to have the stamp or a
photocopy of it on you when you are out with the silencer.

The question - who does the photo and the gun belong to?

Would you have us believe it's yours?

Good laugh.



Hehehe. You're a moron.

The Can...
 

On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 13:33:57 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 10:00:37 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


There probably are a couple of posters here who are interested in seeing
a can mounted on a Ruger Mk. III.

http://tinyurl.com/qhq5wyj

It's a SilencerCo "Sparrow" silencer. The pistol is a bull barrel Ruger
Mk. III 512. I sent it off to Volquartsen to have the barrel threaded,
and for installation of the "full" Volquartsen modification kit.

For now, I'm using CCI "Standard" .22LR ammo, a round that is subsonic
and has enough "oomph" to cycle the pistol and my .22LR semi-auto rifle.
CCI's "Quiet" ammo doesn't have enough of a charge to cycle these firearms.

There are some name-brand "suppressor" rounds out there, supposedly, but
I've only found one source for CCI's rounds, and they are grossly
overpriced.

The loudest noise you hear when firing these rounds is the sound of the
firearms' bolt cycling.

When I applied for the necessary federal tax stamp, I was advised to use
a trust on the forms, because for several unknown reasons, the ATF
approves "trust" applications quicker than "individual" applications.
From what I have read on various firearms sites, that is indeed the
case, but no one seems to know why. When you get your stamp back, it is
"mounted" on a form. The stamp is greenish blue or blueish green, and
the ATF'er who processed it writes the serial number of the silencer on
the stamp, dates it, and initials it. You have to have the stamp or a
photocopy of it on you when you are out with the silencer.

The question - who does the photo and the gun belong to?

Would you have us believe it's yours?

Good laugh.

===

It probably belongs to some wannabe ass-assin. Maybe it is his.

The Can...
 

On 6/3/2015 1:38 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/3/15 1:33 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 10:00:37 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


There probably are a couple of posters here who are interested in seeing
a can mounted on a Ruger Mk. III.

http://tinyurl.com/qhq5wyj

It's a SilencerCo "Sparrow" silencer. The pistol is a bull barrel Ruger
Mk. III 512. I sent it off to Volquartsen to have the barrel threaded,
and for installation of the "full" Volquartsen modification kit.

For now, I'm using CCI "Standard" .22LR ammo, a round that is subsonic
and has enough "oomph" to cycle the pistol and my .22LR semi-auto rifle.
CCI's "Quiet" ammo doesn't have enough of a charge to cycle these
firearms.

There are some name-brand "suppressor" rounds out there, supposedly, but
I've only found one source for CCI's rounds, and they are grossly
overpriced.

The loudest noise you hear when firing these rounds is the sound of the
firearms' bolt cycling.

When I applied for the necessary federal tax stamp, I was advised to use
a trust on the forms, because for several unknown reasons, the ATF
approves "trust" applications quicker than "individual" applications.
From what I have read on various firearms sites, that is indeed the
case, but no one seems to know why. When you get your stamp back, it is
"mounted" on a form. The stamp is greenish blue or blueish green, and
the ATF'er who processed it writes the serial number of the silencer on
the stamp, dates it, and initials it. You have to have the stamp or a
photocopy of it on you when you are out with the silencer.

The question - who does the photo and the gun belong to?

Would you have us believe it's yours?

Good laugh.



Hehehe. You're a moron.

You call the poor guy a moron all the time and then you expect him to
ride in your L T Pahkah? I'd say you are the real moron.

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

The Can...
 

On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 14:39:08 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 13:33:57 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 10:00:37 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


There probably are a couple of posters here who are interested in seeing
a can mounted on a Ruger Mk. III.

http://tinyurl.com/qhq5wyj

It's a SilencerCo "Sparrow" silencer. The pistol is a bull barrel Ruger
Mk. III 512. I sent it off to Volquartsen to have the barrel threaded,
and for installation of the "full" Volquartsen modification kit.

For now, I'm using CCI "Standard" .22LR ammo, a round that is subsonic
and has enough "oomph" to cycle the pistol and my .22LR semi-auto rifle.
CCI's "Quiet" ammo doesn't have enough of a charge to cycle these firearms.

There are some name-brand "suppressor" rounds out there, supposedly, but
I've only found one source for CCI's rounds, and they are grossly
overpriced.

The loudest noise you hear when firing these rounds is the sound of the
firearms' bolt cycling.

When I applied for the necessary federal tax stamp, I was advised to use
a trust on the forms, because for several unknown reasons, the ATF
approves "trust" applications quicker than "individual" applications.
From what I have read on various firearms sites, that is indeed the
case, but no one seems to know why. When you get your stamp back, it is
"mounted" on a form. The stamp is greenish blue or blueish green, and
the ATF'er who processed it writes the serial number of the silencer on
the stamp, dates it, and initials it. You have to have the stamp or a
photocopy of it on you when you are out with the silencer.

The question - who does the photo and the gun belong to?

Would you have us believe it's yours?

Good laugh.

===

It probably belongs to some wannabe ass-assin. Maybe it is his.

OK, fine. He got the photo from someone and now its his.
--

Guns don't cause problems.
Gun owner behavior causes problems.

The Can...
 

On 6/3/15 3:38 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 14:39:08 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 13:33:57 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 10:00:37 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


There probably are a couple of posters here who are interested in seeing
a can mounted on a Ruger Mk. III.

http://tinyurl.com/qhq5wyj

It's a SilencerCo "Sparrow" silencer. The pistol is a bull barrel Ruger
Mk. III 512. I sent it off to Volquartsen to have the barrel threaded,
and for installation of the "full" Volquartsen modification kit.

For now, I'm using CCI "Standard" .22LR ammo, a round that is subsonic
and has enough "oomph" to cycle the pistol and my .22LR semi-auto rifle.
CCI's "Quiet" ammo doesn't have enough of a charge to cycle these firearms.

There are some name-brand "suppressor" rounds out there, supposedly, but
I've only found one source for CCI's rounds, and they are grossly
overpriced.

The loudest noise you hear when firing these rounds is the sound of the
firearms' bolt cycling.

When I applied for the necessary federal tax stamp, I was advised to use
a trust on the forms, because for several unknown reasons, the ATF
approves "trust" applications quicker than "individual" applications.
From what I have read on various firearms sites, that is indeed the
case, but no one seems to know why. When you get your stamp back, it is
"mounted" on a form. The stamp is greenish blue or blueish green, and
the ATF'er who processed it writes the serial number of the silencer on
the stamp, dates it, and initials it. You have to have the stamp or a
photocopy of it on you when you are out with the silencer.

The question - who does the photo and the gun belong to?

Would you have us believe it's yours?

Good laugh.

===

It probably belongs to some wannabe ass-assin. Maybe it is his.

OK, fine. He got the photo from someone and now its his.



Hehehe. Dumb ****s.

The Can...
 

On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 15:25:40 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

You call the poor guy a moron all the time and then you expect him to
ride in your L T Pahkah? I'd say you are the real moron.

===

The L T Pahkah disappeared quickly and quietly so I think it must have
been found lacking in some important way. It certainly didn't buy him
much in the way of bragging rights. No doubt he probably sold it for
more than he paid.

The Can...
 

On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 16:15:46 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 15:25:40 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

You call the poor guy a moron all the time and then you expect him to
ride in your L T Pahkah? I'd say you are the real moron.

===

The L T Pahkah disappeared quickly and quietly so I think it must have
been found lacking in some important way. It certainly didn't buy him
much in the way of bragging rights. No doubt he probably sold it for
more than he paid.

Absolutely.
--

Guns don't cause problems.
Gun owner behavior causes problems.

The Can...
 

On 6/3/15 5:04 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 16:15:46 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 15:25:40 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

You call the poor guy a moron all the time and then you expect him to
ride in your L T Pahkah? I'd say you are the real moron.

===

The L T Pahkah disappeared quickly and quietly so I think it must have
been found lacking in some important way. It certainly didn't buy him
much in the way of bragging rights. No doubt he probably sold it for
more than he paid.

Absolutely.



Another bull**** tale from Tweedledee, Tweedledumber and the Not So
Great White Racist. I kept the 21' Parker for four years, about as long
as I kept any of my outboard boats, with the exception of my 25' Parker,
which I kept for five years. Typically, I kept outboard boats for no
longer than one year after the standard three-year outboard motor
warranty ran out.

By the way, Herring, that little boat you last owned would have fit
inside the 21' Parker and the only part of it you might have seen would
have been the windshield.

Both the Parkers were great boats. I simply got bored with fishing.