| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Oooops ....
On 7/27/2015 7:45 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/27/2015 7:29 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/27/15 7:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: Now Hillary is changing her story ... just a little ... again, in that famous Clintonesque way. Trustworthy? What a joke. Yawn. She's a lot more trustworthy than any of the mooks seeking the GOP nomination. No question that some of the GOP candidates are making some very stupid statements that most, including me, would never agree with. But we are discussing "trustworthiness". I can't think of a single thing Hillary has ever said or done that would give me a feeling that she is a truthful, honest and trustworthy person. The polls on the subject appear to back up my opinion. She is so smarmy. It's surprising that anyone falls for it. Nevertheless, she bears the traits that Harry admires in a woman. -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
|
#12
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oooops ....
On 7/27/2015 7:50 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/27/15 7:45 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 7/27/2015 7:29 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/27/15 7:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: Now Hillary is changing her story ... just a little ... again, in that famous Clintonesque way. Trustworthy? What a joke. Yawn. She's a lot more trustworthy than any of the mooks seeking the GOP nomination. No question that some of the GOP candidates are making some very stupid statements that most, including me, would never agree with. But we are discussing "trustworthiness". I can't think of a single thing Hillary has ever said or done that would give me a feeling that she is a truthful, honest and trustworthy person. The polls on the subject appear to back up my opinion. As I said, whatever your opinion of her, she is more trustworthy than the GOP mooks hoping to run against her. I can't agree with that because I don't know enough about all the GOP'ers, their backgrounds and history. Hillary's background and history is readily apparent for anyone to see if they have the interest. Some people who live in the public view, enjoying the perks of being somewhat of a celebrity lose sight of reality ... and even of right and wrong. They feel "entitled". I don't know anything about Hillary's basic moral character but I think life's opportunities and experiences has warped her sense of truthfulness. What has she accomplished on her own? She was a mediocre attorney with some questionable activities then became "first lady" of Arkansas when her husband was elected governor. Then, eight years as first lady in the White House where her only obvious activity was a failed attempt to revamp health care. Then, on to the Senate, riding primarily on her husband's coat tails and name. She had to adopt a new "favorite" baseball team to endear her to New Yorkers, but heck, that's just politics. Then a failed attempt at the Democratic nomination for POTUS. Her lies and made up stories of her "war" experiences certainly didn't help there. A so-so stint as Secretary of State that still is causing government investigations into her judgement. Yup, there's a fine candidate for POTUS. |
|
#13
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oooops ....
|
|
#15
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oooops ....
On 7/27/15 8:11 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... Now Hillary is changing her story ... just a little ... again, in that famous Clintonesque way. This weekend, she modified her statement about sending or receiving classified emails on her private server by saying, "I did not email anything that was classified at the time." The "that was classified at the time" is new. Before this weekend she claimed she never sent any classified emails period. Meanwhile, there is growing evidence, including from the NSA that indeed, some of the emails contained information that was definitely classified. Concern exists that classified information was subject to being compromised. She violated government policy and rules. She denies it, yet now alludes to the fact that some of the emails "may have become classified". When it was requested that the server's emails be turned over for inspection, she first refused, then selectively offered the emails she was willing to release and "destroyed" the rest. Trustworthy? What a joke. She killed Vince Foster too. Got away with it. While she was running drugs from South America. There's no limit to her evil doings. I think the never-ending criticism of Mrs. Clinton is little more than desperation on the part of Republicans. That party has an incredible collection of loudmouths, losers, racists, morons, religious nutcases, ethnic haters, woman haters, civil rights haters, and whoever gets that party's nomination is going to be carrying more baggage than AMTRAK. Individually, none of them has been getting the attention so richly deserved. |
|
#16
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oooops ....
In article , says...
On 7/27/15 8:11 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Now Hillary is changing her story ... just a little ... again, in that famous Clintonesque way. This weekend, she modified her statement about sending or receiving classified emails on her private server by saying, "I did not email anything that was classified at the time." The "that was classified at the time" is new. Before this weekend she claimed she never sent any classified emails period. Meanwhile, there is growing evidence, including from the NSA that indeed, some of the emails contained information that was definitely classified. Concern exists that classified information was subject to being compromised. She violated government policy and rules. She denies it, yet now alludes to the fact that some of the emails "may have become classified". When it was requested that the server's emails be turned over for inspection, she first refused, then selectively offered the emails she was willing to release and "destroyed" the rest. Trustworthy? What a joke. She killed Vince Foster too. Got away with it. While she was running drugs from South America. There's no limit to her evil doings. I think the never-ending criticism of Mrs. Clinton is little more than desperation on the part of Republicans. That party has an incredible collection of loudmouths, losers, racists, morons, religious nutcases, ethnic haters, woman haters, civil rights haters, and whoever gets that party's nomination is going to be carrying more baggage than AMTRAK. Individually, none of them has been getting the attention so richly deserved. Sure seems that way. I remember back in the '90's Limbaugh going after her viciously. First time I realized that insanity had gone mainstream. Turned Limbaugh off my radio forever. They'd have to get something solid on her before I'd believe it, because they've told so many outright lies about her she's been immunized in my eyes. I get a kick out of Luddite's "outrage" at her caginess. She's a politician, for crying out loud. They all lie. |
|
#17
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oooops ....
On 7/27/2015 12:18 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... On 7/27/15 8:11 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Now Hillary is changing her story ... just a little ... again, in that famous Clintonesque way. This weekend, she modified her statement about sending or receiving classified emails on her private server by saying, "I did not email anything that was classified at the time." The "that was classified at the time" is new. Before this weekend she claimed she never sent any classified emails period. Meanwhile, there is growing evidence, including from the NSA that indeed, some of the emails contained information that was definitely classified. Concern exists that classified information was subject to being compromised. She violated government policy and rules. She denies it, yet now alludes to the fact that some of the emails "may have become classified". When it was requested that the server's emails be turned over for inspection, she first refused, then selectively offered the emails she was willing to release and "destroyed" the rest. Trustworthy? What a joke. She killed Vince Foster too. Got away with it. While she was running drugs from South America. There's no limit to her evil doings. I think the never-ending criticism of Mrs. Clinton is little more than desperation on the part of Republicans. That party has an incredible collection of loudmouths, losers, racists, morons, religious nutcases, ethnic haters, woman haters, civil rights haters, and whoever gets that party's nomination is going to be carrying more baggage than AMTRAK. Individually, none of them has been getting the attention so richly deserved. Sure seems that way. I remember back in the '90's Limbaugh going after her viciously. First time I realized that insanity had gone mainstream. Turned Limbaugh off my radio forever. They'd have to get something solid on her before I'd believe it, because they've told so many outright lies about her she's been immunized in my eyes. I get a kick out of Luddite's "outrage" at her caginess. She's a politician, for crying out loud. They all lie. I get a kick out of you giving Hillary's lies and deceitfulness a pass "because she's a politician". |
|
#18
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oooops ....
On 7/27/15 1:45 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/27/2015 12:18 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 7/27/15 8:11 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Now Hillary is changing her story ... just a little ... again, in that famous Clintonesque way. This weekend, she modified her statement about sending or receiving classified emails on her private server by saying, "I did not email anything that was classified at the time." The "that was classified at the time" is new. Before this weekend she claimed she never sent any classified emails period. Meanwhile, there is growing evidence, including from the NSA that indeed, some of the emails contained information that was definitely classified. Concern exists that classified information was subject to being compromised. She violated government policy and rules. She denies it, yet now alludes to the fact that some of the emails "may have become classified". When it was requested that the server's emails be turned over for inspection, she first refused, then selectively offered the emails she was willing to release and "destroyed" the rest. Trustworthy? What a joke. She killed Vince Foster too. Got away with it. While she was running drugs from South America. There's no limit to her evil doings. I think the never-ending criticism of Mrs. Clinton is little more than desperation on the part of Republicans. That party has an incredible collection of loudmouths, losers, racists, morons, religious nutcases, ethnic haters, woman haters, civil rights haters, and whoever gets that party's nomination is going to be carrying more baggage than AMTRAK. Individually, none of them has been getting the attention so richly deserved. Sure seems that way. I remember back in the '90's Limbaugh going after her viciously. First time I realized that insanity had gone mainstream. Turned Limbaugh off my radio forever. They'd have to get something solid on her before I'd believe it, because they've told so many outright lies about her she's been immunized in my eyes. I get a kick out of Luddite's "outrage" at her caginess. She's a politician, for crying out loud. They all lie. I get a kick out of you giving Hillary's lies and deceitfulness a pass "because she's a politician". Is Jeb still lying about Hillary in order to score points with the religious nutcases that underpin the GOP? |
|
#19
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oooops ....
On 7/27/2015 1:54 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/27/15 1:45 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 7/27/2015 12:18 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 7/27/15 8:11 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Now Hillary is changing her story ... just a little ... again, in that famous Clintonesque way. This weekend, she modified her statement about sending or receiving classified emails on her private server by saying, "I did not email anything that was classified at the time." The "that was classified at the time" is new. Before this weekend she claimed she never sent any classified emails period. Meanwhile, there is growing evidence, including from the NSA that indeed, some of the emails contained information that was definitely classified. Concern exists that classified information was subject to being compromised. She violated government policy and rules. She denies it, yet now alludes to the fact that some of the emails "may have become classified". When it was requested that the server's emails be turned over for inspection, she first refused, then selectively offered the emails she was willing to release and "destroyed" the rest. Trustworthy? What a joke. She killed Vince Foster too. Got away with it. While she was running drugs from South America. There's no limit to her evil doings. I think the never-ending criticism of Mrs. Clinton is little more than desperation on the part of Republicans. That party has an incredible collection of loudmouths, losers, racists, morons, religious nutcases, ethnic haters, woman haters, civil rights haters, and whoever gets that party's nomination is going to be carrying more baggage than AMTRAK. Individually, none of them has been getting the attention so richly deserved. Sure seems that way. I remember back in the '90's Limbaugh going after her viciously. First time I realized that insanity had gone mainstream. Turned Limbaugh off my radio forever. They'd have to get something solid on her before I'd believe it, because they've told so many outright lies about her she's been immunized in my eyes. I get a kick out of Luddite's "outrage" at her caginess. She's a politician, for crying out loud. They all lie. I get a kick out of you giving Hillary's lies and deceitfulness a pass "because she's a politician". Is Jeb still lying about Hillary in order to score points with the religious nutcases that underpin the GOP? Beats me. I don't follow everything they all say. I see what's in the news though. I also don't subscribe or read right-wing or liberal-progressive blogs. I don't listen to shows like "The Young Turks" either. Obviously, you do. |
|
#20
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oooops ....
On 7/27/15 2:19 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/27/2015 1:54 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/27/15 1:45 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 7/27/2015 12:18 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 7/27/15 8:11 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Now Hillary is changing her story ... just a little ... again, in that famous Clintonesque way. This weekend, she modified her statement about sending or receiving classified emails on her private server by saying, "I did not email anything that was classified at the time." The "that was classified at the time" is new. Before this weekend she claimed she never sent any classified emails period. Meanwhile, there is growing evidence, including from the NSA that indeed, some of the emails contained information that was definitely classified. Concern exists that classified information was subject to being compromised. She violated government policy and rules. She denies it, yet now alludes to the fact that some of the emails "may have become classified". When it was requested that the server's emails be turned over for inspection, she first refused, then selectively offered the emails she was willing to release and "destroyed" the rest. Trustworthy? What a joke. She killed Vince Foster too. Got away with it. While she was running drugs from South America. There's no limit to her evil doings. I think the never-ending criticism of Mrs. Clinton is little more than desperation on the part of Republicans. That party has an incredible collection of loudmouths, losers, racists, morons, religious nutcases, ethnic haters, woman haters, civil rights haters, and whoever gets that party's nomination is going to be carrying more baggage than AMTRAK. Individually, none of them has been getting the attention so richly deserved. Sure seems that way. I remember back in the '90's Limbaugh going after her viciously. First time I realized that insanity had gone mainstream. Turned Limbaugh off my radio forever. They'd have to get something solid on her before I'd believe it, because they've told so many outright lies about her she's been immunized in my eyes. I get a kick out of Luddite's "outrage" at her caginess. She's a politician, for crying out loud. They all lie. I get a kick out of you giving Hillary's lies and deceitfulness a pass "because she's a politician". Is Jeb still lying about Hillary in order to score points with the religious nutcases that underpin the GOP? Beats me. I don't follow everything they all say. I see what's in the news though. I also don't subscribe or read right-wing or liberal-progressive blogs. I don't listen to shows like "The Young Turks" either. Obviously, you do. Obviously, you are wrong. Once in a while something from the "Turks" shows up on other sites I read. Don't fall into the right-wing trap here of jumping to conclusions about information not in play. |
Linear Mode
