LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default Oooops ....

Now Hillary is changing her story ... just a little ... again, in that
famous Clintonesque way.

This weekend, she modified her statement about sending or receiving
classified emails on her private server by saying, "I did not email
anything that was classified at the time." The "that was classified
at the time" is new. Before this weekend she claimed she never sent
any classified emails period.

Meanwhile, there is growing evidence, including from the NSA that
indeed, some of the emails contained information that was definitely
classified. Concern exists that classified information was subject to
being compromised.

She violated government policy and rules. She denies it, yet now
alludes to the fact that some of the emails "may have become classified".

When it was requested that the server's emails be turned over for
inspection, she first refused, then selectively offered the emails she
was willing to release and "destroyed" the rest.

Trustworthy? What a joke.

I wonder if people serving in high government positions are subject to
the FBI background checks that us mere mortals are required to undergo
for security clearances. I held security clearances both in the
military and later as a civilian because one of the DOD programs I was
involved with in business required access to classified information.
In both cases, a background check was done by the FBI which included
friends and relatives being interviewed and asked questions about my
past and current activities. I remember the civilian one well because
issuance of the clearance was held up temporarily because the FBI needed
more information as to why I traveled to the PRC back in 1986.

Both the military and the DOD have specific regulations as to how
classified information and/or documents are handled and stored.
Inspections are conducted to ensure compliance.

I know a guy (he was the president of another company involved in the
program) who was indited and sentenced to a two year house arrest
(wearing an ankle bracelet) for failure to properly maintain classified
data at his company.







 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oooops Frogwatch General 7 May 11th 09 11:16 PM
Oooops TheBrewMaster@The Brewery.hic General 26 July 15th 07 02:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017