wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:45:38 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 7/27/2015 12:18 PM, Boating All Out wrote:

Sure seems that way. I remember back in the '90's Limbaugh going after
her viciously. First time I realized that insanity had gone mainstream.
Turned Limbaugh off my radio forever.
They'd have to get something solid on her before I'd believe it, because
they've told so many outright lies about her she's been immunized in my
eyes. I get a kick out of Luddite's "outrage" at her caginess.
She's a politician, for crying out loud. They all lie.





I get a kick out of you giving Hillary's lies and deceitfulness a pass
"because she's a politician".


Yeah, that is an excuse that didn't work for Nixon, Blagojevich,
Rostenkowski, Ryan or Menendez. (and the list goes on)

How many times did you help elect Rick Scott?
--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:45:38 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 7/27/2015 12:18 PM, Boating All Out wrote:

Sure seems that way. I remember back in the '90's Limbaugh going after
her viciously. First time I realized that insanity had gone mainstream.
Turned Limbaugh off my radio forever.
They'd have to get something solid on her before I'd believe it, because
they've told so many outright lies about her she's been immunized in my
eyes. I get a kick out of Luddite's "outrage" at her caginess.
She's a politician, for crying out loud. They all lie.





I get a kick out of you giving Hillary's lies and deceitfulness a pass
"because she's a politician".


Yeah, that is an excuse that didn't work for Nixon, Blagojevich,
Rostenkowski, Ryan or Menendez. (and the list goes on)

When they get anything that sticks on HRC, and she's in the slammer, let
me know. If you guys are right, that's where she'll be.
And if she stays free, you'll still be right.
You'll simply say "She got away with it!"
Hey, you can't lose.

On 7/27/2015 6:21 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:45:38 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 7/27/2015 12:18 PM, Boating All Out wrote:

Sure seems that way. I remember back in the '90's Limbaugh going after
her viciously. First time I realized that insanity had gone mainstream.
Turned Limbaugh off my radio forever.
They'd have to get something solid on her before I'd believe it, because
they've told so many outright lies about her she's been immunized in my
eyes. I get a kick out of Luddite's "outrage" at her caginess.
She's a politician, for crying out loud. They all lie.





I get a kick out of you giving Hillary's lies and deceitfulness a pass
"because she's a politician".


Yeah, that is an excuse that didn't work for Nixon, Blagojevich,
Rostenkowski, Ryan or Menendez. (and the list goes on)

When they get anything that sticks on HRC, and she's in the slammer, let
me know. If you guys are right, that's where she'll be.
And if she stays free, you'll still be right.
You'll simply say "She got away with it!"
Hey, you can't lose.



She's not headed for the slammer. I am just very hopeful that she's not
headed for the White House.

She's not even a good politician. No notable accomplishments to speak
of. Bill is.

On 7/27/15 6:28 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/27/2015 6:21 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:45:38 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 7/27/2015 12:18 PM, Boating All Out wrote:

Sure seems that way. I remember back in the '90's Limbaugh going
after
her viciously. First time I realized that insanity had gone
mainstream.
Turned Limbaugh off my radio forever.
They'd have to get something solid on her before I'd believe it,
because
they've told so many outright lies about her she's been immunized
in my
eyes. I get a kick out of Luddite's "outrage" at her caginess.
She's a politician, for crying out loud. They all lie.





I get a kick out of you giving Hillary's lies and deceitfulness a pass
"because she's a politician".


Yeah, that is an excuse that didn't work for Nixon, Blagojevich,
Rostenkowski, Ryan or Menendez. (and the list goes on)

When they get anything that sticks on HRC, and she's in the slammer, let
me know. If you guys are right, that's where she'll be.
And if she stays free, you'll still be right.
You'll simply say "She got away with it!"
Hey, you can't lose.



She's not headed for the slammer. I am just very hopeful that she's not
headed for the White House.

She's not even a good politician. No notable accomplishments to speak
of. Bill is.




Your Republican alternatives are far, far worse.

On 7/27/2015 6:34 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/27/15 6:28 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/27/2015 6:21 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:45:38 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 7/27/2015 12:18 PM, Boating All Out wrote:

Sure seems that way. I remember back in the '90's Limbaugh going
after
her viciously. First time I realized that insanity had gone
mainstream.
Turned Limbaugh off my radio forever.
They'd have to get something solid on her before I'd believe it,
because
they've told so many outright lies about her she's been immunized
in my
eyes. I get a kick out of Luddite's "outrage" at her caginess.
She's a politician, for crying out loud. They all lie.





I get a kick out of you giving Hillary's lies and deceitfulness a pass
"because she's a politician".


Yeah, that is an excuse that didn't work for Nixon, Blagojevich,
Rostenkowski, Ryan or Menendez. (and the list goes on)

When they get anything that sticks on HRC, and she's in the slammer, let
me know. If you guys are right, that's where she'll be.
And if she stays free, you'll still be right.
You'll simply say "She got away with it!"
Hey, you can't lose.



She's not headed for the slammer. I am just very hopeful that she's not
headed for the White House.

She's not even a good politician. No notable accomplishments to speak
of. Bill is.




Your Republican alternatives are far, far worse.


"My" Republican alternatives? Shouldn't it be "Our" or "The"?

Anyway, Hillary has no executive experience in running anything. When
her husband asked her to form a task force and come up with a health
care reform plan, she botched it so badly that even the Democrats didn't
want to bring it to a vote. It was quickly swept under the rug, if you
recall.

Since then, what has she done? Nothing really. Lived a pampered life as
First Lady, traveled all over the world as SOS accomplishing ...
nothing. Heck, as Secretary of State, John Kerry makes her look like a
rank amateur ... or worse.

You seem to adhere yourself to whomever recites the party line and
maintains a (D) after their name. I tend to look more at the person,
his/her qualifications, achievements, contributions and experience.
Hillary has none of those qualities so she has to make up stories and
lie to appear relevant. She also has demonstrated extremely poor
judgement on more than one occasion.

Not POTUS material. Sorry.

On 7/27/15 7:03 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/27/2015 6:34 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/27/15 6:28 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/27/2015 6:21 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:45:38 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 7/27/2015 12:18 PM, Boating All Out wrote:

Sure seems that way. I remember back in the '90's Limbaugh going
after
her viciously. First time I realized that insanity had gone
mainstream.
Turned Limbaugh off my radio forever.
They'd have to get something solid on her before I'd believe it,
because
they've told so many outright lies about her she's been immunized
in my
eyes. I get a kick out of Luddite's "outrage" at her caginess.
She's a politician, for crying out loud. They all lie.





I get a kick out of you giving Hillary's lies and deceitfulness a
pass
"because she's a politician".


Yeah, that is an excuse that didn't work for Nixon, Blagojevich,
Rostenkowski, Ryan or Menendez. (and the list goes on)

When they get anything that sticks on HRC, and she's in the slammer,
let
me know. If you guys are right, that's where she'll be.
And if she stays free, you'll still be right.
You'll simply say "She got away with it!"
Hey, you can't lose.



She's not headed for the slammer. I am just very hopeful that she's not
headed for the White House.

She's not even a good politician. No notable accomplishments to speak
of. Bill is.




Your Republican alternatives are far, far worse.


"My" Republican alternatives? Shouldn't it be "Our" or "The"?

Anyway, Hillary has no executive experience in running anything. When
her husband asked her to form a task force and come up with a health
care reform plan, she botched it so badly that even the Democrats didn't
want to bring it to a vote. It was quickly swept under the rug, if you
recall.

Since then, what has she done? Nothing really. Lived a pampered life as
First Lady, traveled all over the world as SOS accomplishing ...
nothing. Heck, as Secretary of State, John Kerry makes her look like a
rank amateur ... or worse.

You seem to adhere yourself to whomever recites the party line and
maintains a (D) after their name. I tend to look more at the person,
his/her qualifications, achievements, contributions and experience.
Hillary has none of those qualities so she has to make up stories and
lie to appear relevant. She also has demonstrated extremely poor
judgement on more than one occasion.

Not POTUS material. Sorry.




I see each and every Republican candidate who has a chance of winning
the nomination as someone who will further destroy the middle and lower
income groups, restrict womens' right, work against science, weaken
pollution laws, weaken banking laws...everyone of them.

On 7/27/2015 7:05 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/27/15 7:03 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/27/2015 6:34 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/27/15 6:28 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/27/2015 6:21 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:45:38 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"

wrote:

On 7/27/2015 12:18 PM, Boating All Out wrote:

Sure seems that way. I remember back in the '90's Limbaugh going
after
her viciously. First time I realized that insanity had gone
mainstream.
Turned Limbaugh off my radio forever.
They'd have to get something solid on her before I'd believe it,
because
they've told so many outright lies about her she's been immunized
in my
eyes. I get a kick out of Luddite's "outrage" at her caginess.
She's a politician, for crying out loud. They all lie.





I get a kick out of you giving Hillary's lies and deceitfulness a
pass
"because she's a politician".


Yeah, that is an excuse that didn't work for Nixon, Blagojevich,
Rostenkowski, Ryan or Menendez. (and the list goes on)

When they get anything that sticks on HRC, and she's in the slammer,
let
me know. If you guys are right, that's where she'll be.
And if she stays free, you'll still be right.
You'll simply say "She got away with it!"
Hey, you can't lose.



She's not headed for the slammer. I am just very hopeful that she's
not
headed for the White House.

She's not even a good politician. No notable accomplishments to speak
of. Bill is.




Your Republican alternatives are far, far worse.


"My" Republican alternatives? Shouldn't it be "Our" or "The"?

Anyway, Hillary has no executive experience in running anything. When
her husband asked her to form a task force and come up with a health
care reform plan, she botched it so badly that even the Democrats didn't
want to bring it to a vote. It was quickly swept under the rug, if you
recall.

Since then, what has she done? Nothing really. Lived a pampered life as
First Lady, traveled all over the world as SOS accomplishing ...
nothing. Heck, as Secretary of State, John Kerry makes her look like a
rank amateur ... or worse.

You seem to adhere yourself to whomever recites the party line and
maintains a (D) after their name. I tend to look more at the person,
his/her qualifications, achievements, contributions and experience.
Hillary has none of those qualities so she has to make up stories and
lie to appear relevant. She also has demonstrated extremely poor
judgement on more than one occasion.

Not POTUS material. Sorry.




I see each and every Republican candidate who has a chance of winning
the nomination as someone who will further destroy the middle and lower
income groups, restrict womens' right, work against science, weaken
pollution laws, weaken banking laws...everyone of them.


Oh, please. Let's wait and see what the nomination cycle debates show.
I'd like to hear more from Jim Webb. Even Bernie is entertaining in a
way.

Ha. Imagine a hypothetical. Hillary wins the Democratic nomination.
The Donald, for some bizarre reason, wins the Republican.

A presidential election debate between the two of them would set records
for viewers, mostly looking for the entertainment aspect of it.

Neither can control what comes out of their mouths.

On 7/27/15 7:39 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/27/2015 7:05 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/27/15 7:03 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/27/2015 6:34 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/27/15 6:28 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/27/2015 6:21 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:45:38 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"

wrote:

On 7/27/2015 12:18 PM, Boating All Out wrote:

Sure seems that way. I remember back in the '90's Limbaugh going
after
her viciously. First time I realized that insanity had gone
mainstream.
Turned Limbaugh off my radio forever.
They'd have to get something solid on her before I'd believe it,
because
they've told so many outright lies about her she's been immunized
in my
eyes. I get a kick out of Luddite's "outrage" at her caginess.
She's a politician, for crying out loud. They all lie.





I get a kick out of you giving Hillary's lies and deceitfulness a
pass
"because she's a politician".


Yeah, that is an excuse that didn't work for Nixon, Blagojevich,
Rostenkowski, Ryan or Menendez. (and the list goes on)

When they get anything that sticks on HRC, and she's in the slammer,
let
me know. If you guys are right, that's where she'll be.
And if she stays free, you'll still be right.
You'll simply say "She got away with it!"
Hey, you can't lose.



She's not headed for the slammer. I am just very hopeful that she's
not
headed for the White House.

She's not even a good politician. No notable accomplishments to speak
of. Bill is.




Your Republican alternatives are far, far worse.


"My" Republican alternatives? Shouldn't it be "Our" or "The"?

Anyway, Hillary has no executive experience in running anything. When
her husband asked her to form a task force and come up with a health
care reform plan, she botched it so badly that even the Democrats didn't
want to bring it to a vote. It was quickly swept under the rug, if you
recall.

Since then, what has she done? Nothing really. Lived a pampered life as
First Lady, traveled all over the world as SOS accomplishing ...
nothing. Heck, as Secretary of State, John Kerry makes her look like a
rank amateur ... or worse.

You seem to adhere yourself to whomever recites the party line and
maintains a (D) after their name. I tend to look more at the person,
his/her qualifications, achievements, contributions and experience.
Hillary has none of those qualities so she has to make up stories and
lie to appear relevant. She also has demonstrated extremely poor
judgement on more than one occasion.

Not POTUS material. Sorry.




I see each and every Republican candidate who has a chance of winning
the nomination as someone who will further destroy the middle and lower
income groups, restrict womens' right, work against science, weaken
pollution laws, weaken banking laws...everyone of them.


Oh, please. Let's wait and see what the nomination cycle debates show.
I'd like to hear more from Jim Webb. Even Bernie is entertaining in a
way.

Ha. Imagine a hypothetical. Hillary wins the Democratic nomination.
The Donald, for some bizarre reason, wins the Republican.

A presidential election debate between the two of them would set records
for viewers, mostly looking for the entertainment aspect of it.

Neither can control what comes out of their mouths.




Jim Webb...who? (Yeah, I know who he is. He's a "who is he?"

On 7/27/2015 8:34 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:21:40 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:45:38 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 7/27/2015 12:18 PM, Boating All Out wrote:

Sure seems that way. I remember back in the '90's Limbaugh going after
her viciously. First time I realized that insanity had gone mainstream.
Turned Limbaugh off my radio forever.
They'd have to get something solid on her before I'd believe it, because
they've told so many outright lies about her she's been immunized in my
eyes. I get a kick out of Luddite's "outrage" at her caginess.
She's a politician, for crying out loud. They all lie.





I get a kick out of you giving Hillary's lies and deceitfulness a pass
"because she's a politician".


Yeah, that is an excuse that didn't work for Nixon, Blagojevich,
Rostenkowski, Ryan or Menendez. (and the list goes on)

When they get anything that sticks on HRC, and she's in the slammer, let
me know. If you guys are right, that's where she'll be.
And if she stays free, you'll still be right.
You'll simply say "She got away with it!"
Hey, you can't lose.

I doubt she will ever be charged with a crime but I also expect her to
withdraw to spend more time with her family or for some undisclosed
health issue.



Or, if trends continue, her recognition that she is about to fail ... again.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/27/15 7:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
Now Hillary is changing her story ... just a little ... again, in that
famous Clintonesque way.


Trustworthy? What a joke.

Yawn. She's a lot more trustworthy than any of the mooks seeking the
GOP nomination.



Tim nailed it!