amdx wrote:
On 8/16/2015 10:40 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
amdx wrote:
On 8/15/2015 2:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/15/15 2:47 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote:

I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but
Mika is REALLY against HRC.
She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed
HRC had used a "personal" server at State.
That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done.
HRC can not be President.
It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as
transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as
Luddite.
Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane
and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well.
She just may move to Fox.

Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans
that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough to call
her on it?
Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe it's the
start of an MSNBC turn around.


She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow.

Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow!

Mikek





Hahahahah...you're a pistol, Mikey.

Rachel is hard for you to watch because, well, you'll figure it out or
someone will tell you.

Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she
communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often sarcastic)
Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out.
What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her?

Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

You picked those reasons for your inability to comprehend. I had another
reason for you in mind.


At least when Rachel says something the subject is clear.
You write but there is no subject, it's like you are keeping a secret.
When someone asks, you have no response.
Mikek


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Mikey...you were the one who posted maddow was hard to watch and then you
gave reasons.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

In article ,
says...


Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she
communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often
sarcastic)
Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out.
What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her?


Nothing wrong with her "views," though I sometimes
disagree with them.
Just her expression of those views.
She takes 5 minutes to express what should take 30
seconds.
Only to hear the sound of her own voice.
She's an obvious egomaniac.
She's even more selfish that O'Donnell.
At least he has some guests.
Last I watched she's still beginning the show with a
15 minute monologue. Then if she has an expert guest
on the subject of her monologue, she'll ask the guest
to validate her monologue. Her guests get little
time.
She endlessly repeats the same phrases over and over.
She - and others at MSNBC - touted "specials" last
week, where she supposedly gathered old clips of
candidates, which would be the main draw of the
"specials."
It was just another Maddow yakfest.
She's simply a motormouth.
I hardly watch the show any more. Every time I flip
there she's yakking, usually with no substance to
speak of.
She's becoming, no, "become" a joke.

On 8/16/2015 12:26 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...


Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she
communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often
sarcastic)
Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out.
What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her?


Nothing wrong with her "views," though I sometimes
disagree with them.
Just her expression of those views.
She takes 5 minutes to express what should take 30
seconds.
Only to hear the sound of her own voice.
She's an obvious egomaniac.
She's even more selfish that O'Donnell.
At least he has some guests.
Last I watched she's still beginning the show with a
15 minute monologue. Then if she has an expert guest
on the subject of her monologue, she'll ask the guest
to validate her monologue. Her guests get little
time.
She endlessly repeats the same phrases over and over.
She - and others at MSNBC - touted "specials" last
week, where she supposedly gathered old clips of
candidates, which would be the main draw of the
"specials."
It was just another Maddow yakfest.
She's simply a motormouth.
I hardly watch the show any more. Every time I flip
there she's yakking, usually with no substance to
speak of.
She's becoming, no, "become" a joke.




She was different when her show first began. I used to watch her (even
though I didn't necessarily agree with what she said) because she is
smart and she *used* to deliver her subject matter and views with more
class and dignity. I'll listen to that and even consider what the views
are.

But I agree. I think her perceived "success" has either gone to her
head or she is under MSNBC management pressure to be as controversial as
possible for ratings sake. Whatever the reasons, her current style is
obnoxious.

On 8/16/2015 11:23 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/15/2015 2:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/15/15 2:47 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote:

I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but
Mika is REALLY against HRC.
She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed
HRC had used a "personal" server at State.
That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done.
HRC can not be President.
It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as
transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as
Luddite.
Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane
and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well.
She just may move to Fox.

Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans
that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough to call
her on it?
Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe it's the
start of an MSNBC turn around.


She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow.

Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow!

Mikek





Hahahahah...you're a pistol, Mikey.

Rachel is hard for you to watch because, well, you'll figure it out or
someone will tell you.

Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she
communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often
sarcastic)
Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out.
What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her?

Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Oh! For a minute I thought you were talking about HRC. :-)

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

On 8/16/2015 11:52 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/16/2015 10:40 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
amdx wrote:
On 8/15/2015 2:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/15/15 2:47 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote:

I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but
Mika is REALLY against HRC.
She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed
HRC had used a "personal" server at State.
That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done.
HRC can not be President.
It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as
transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as
Luddite.
Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane
and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well.
She just may move to Fox.

Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans
that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough to
call
her on it?
Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe
it's the
start of an MSNBC turn around.


She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow.

Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow!

Mikek





Hahahahah...you're a pistol, Mikey.

Rachel is hard for you to watch because, well, you'll figure it out or
someone will tell you.

Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she
communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often
sarcastic)
Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out.
What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her?

Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

You picked those reasons for your inability to comprehend. I had another
reason for you in mind.


At least when Rachel says something the subject is clear.
You write but there is no subject, it's like you are keeping a secret.
When someone asks, you have no response.
Mikek


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


The mind is a terrible thing to waste; especially on a douchebag like
KKKrause,

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 11:26:10 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...


Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she
communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often
sarcastic)
Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out.
What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her?


Nothing wrong with her "views," though I sometimes
disagree with them.
Just her expression of those views.
She takes 5 minutes to express what should take 30
seconds.
Only to hear the sound of her own voice.
She's an obvious egomaniac.
She's even more selfish that O'Donnell.
At least he has some guests.
Last I watched she's still beginning the show with a
15 minute monologue. Then if she has an expert guest
on the subject of her monologue, she'll ask the guest
to validate her monologue. Her guests get little
time.
She endlessly repeats the same phrases over and over.
She - and others at MSNBC - touted "specials" last
week, where she supposedly gathered old clips of
candidates, which would be the main draw of the
"specials."
It was just another Maddow yakfest.
She's simply a motormouth.
I hardly watch the show any more. Every time I flip
there she's yakking, usually with no substance to
speak of.
She's becoming, no, "become" a joke.


Lyin' Brian will be a perfect addition to that cabal

On 8/16/15 1:47 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 11:26:10 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...


Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she
communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often
sarcastic)
Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out.
What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her?


Nothing wrong with her "views," though I sometimes
disagree with them.
Just her expression of those views.
She takes 5 minutes to express what should take 30
seconds.
Only to hear the sound of her own voice.
She's an obvious egomaniac.
She's even more selfish that O'Donnell.
At least he has some guests.
Last I watched she's still beginning the show with a
15 minute monologue. Then if she has an expert guest
on the subject of her monologue, she'll ask the guest
to validate her monologue. Her guests get little
time.
She endlessly repeats the same phrases over and over.
She - and others at MSNBC - touted "specials" last
week, where she supposedly gathered old clips of
candidates, which would be the main draw of the
"specials."
It was just another Maddow yakfest.
She's simply a motormouth.
I hardly watch the show any more. Every time I flip
there she's yakking, usually with no substance to
speak of.
She's becoming, no, "become" a joke.


Lyin' Brian will be a perfect addition to that cabal



Your Faux Channel was full up on lying broadcasters?

Frankly, my disappointment is with the promotions of Chuck Todd. What a
marshmellowed moron.

On 8/16/2015 11:18 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
amdx wrote:
On 8/16/2015 10:40 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
amdx wrote:
On 8/15/2015 2:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/15/15 2:47 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote:

I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but
Mika is REALLY against HRC.
She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed
HRC had used a "personal" server at State.
That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done.
HRC can not be President.
It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as
transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as
Luddite.
Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane
and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well.
She just may move to Fox.

Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans
that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough to call
her on it?
Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe it's the
start of an MSNBC turn around.


She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow.

Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow!

Mikek





Hahahahah...you're a pistol, Mikey.

Rachel is hard for you to watch because, well, you'll figure it out or
someone will tell you.

Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she
communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often sarcastic)
Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out.
What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her?

Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

You picked those reasons for your inability to comprehend. I had another
reason for you in mind.


At least when Rachel says something the subject is clear.
You write but there is no subject, it's like you are keeping a secret.
When someone asks, you have no response.
Mikek


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Mikey...you were the one who posted maddow was hard to watch and then you
gave reasons.

And your point?

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

On 8/16/15 3:51 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/16/2015 11:18 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
amdx wrote:
On 8/16/2015 10:40 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
amdx wrote:
On 8/15/2015 2:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/15/15 2:47 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote:

I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but
Mika is REALLY against HRC.
She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed
HRC had used a "personal" server at State.
That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done.
HRC can not be President.
It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as
transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as
Luddite.
Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane
and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well.
She just may move to Fox.

Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans
that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough
to call
her on it?
Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe
it's the
start of an MSNBC turn around.


She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow.

Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow!

Mikek





Hahahahah...you're a pistol, Mikey.

Rachel is hard for you to watch because, well, you'll figure it
out or
someone will tell you.

Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she
communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often
sarcastic)
Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out.
What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her?

Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

You picked those reasons for your inability to comprehend. I had
another
reason for you in mind.


At least when Rachel says something the subject is clear.
You write but there is no subject, it's like you are keeping a secret.
When someone asks, you have no response.
Mikek


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Mikey...you were the one who posted maddow was hard to watch and then you
gave reasons.

And your point?


Gee, Mikey, I guess I just don't understand your problem. I watch Ms.
Maddow about once or maybe twice a week, and I don't find it hard,
difficult or confusing.

On 8/16/2015 3:33 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:


I watch Ms.Maddow about once or maybe twice a week, and I don't find
it hard,
difficult or confusing.

There is no surprise there.
Is it your contention I would believe otherwise?
Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com