Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but Mika is REALLY against HRC. She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed HRC had used a "personal" server at State. That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done. HRC can not be President. It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as Luddite. Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well. She just may move to Fox. Hope she takes that douchbag Donnie Deutsch with her. She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/14/2015 9:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but Mika is REALLY against HRC. She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed HRC had used a "personal" server at State. That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done. HRC can not be President. It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as Luddite. Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well. She just may move to Fox. Hope she takes that douchbag Donnie Deutsch with her. She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow. Heh. I caught part of "Morning Joe" this morning and noticed her outrage. Funny to watch. BTW ... my dislike of HRC goes back many years and was not spawned by the the email thing. I think she is deceitful and is prone to lies if they either protect or enhance her personal objectives. Given all that has transpired, she would have been smart to simply acknowledge that in hindsight she should have used a secure government server and email account and she should have released all requested emails and the server when she was first asked. If she's telling the truth those actions would exonerate her and none of this would be much of an issue. It's her contempt for rules, policies and an attitude that none of them apply to her that is causing her grief. A coverup is always more serious than a lack of judgement or error. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/14/2015 9:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but Mika is REALLY against HRC. She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed HRC had used a "personal" server at State. That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done. HRC can not be President. It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as Luddite. Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well. She just may move to Fox. Hope she takes that douchbag Donnie Deutsch with her. She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow. Forgot to mention: It wouldn't surprise me if Mika's criticism of HRC's email server problems are influenced by private discussions with her father. As National Security Adviser during the Carter years, he knows a thing or two about such matters. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 10:19:25 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 8/14/2015 9:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote: I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but Mika is REALLY against HRC. She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed HRC had used a "personal" server at State. That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done. HRC can not be President. It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as Luddite. Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well. She just may move to Fox. Hope she takes that douchbag Donnie Deutsch with her. She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow. Forgot to mention: It wouldn't surprise me if Mika's criticism of HRC's email server problems are influenced by private discussions with her father. As National Security Adviser during the Carter years, he knows a thing or two about such matters. I think it is funny that back in the 90s when they were investigating all the shady dealings in Arkansas, Hillary fell on the grenade, saying those were all her dealings and Bill was far too busy doing his politics thing to know anything about it. Now she wants us to think she is the one with clean hands, even trying to say that was actually Bill's server and she was just using it. Unfortunately Bill is not that willing to jump to her defense. He has remained silent on the issue and we have not really seen much about his use of the server at all. I do believe the old "two for the price of one" thing they were selling us 23 years ago and if there are any shady dealings, he was involved. I think the CBI may end up being more troubling than Benghazi or Email. When you have the spouse of a sitting SoS twisting arms for donations from countries we are also having diplomatic issues with, questions are raised. Those may be the emails we really needed to see and she would call them personal husband and wife communications and probably wiped shortly after they were read. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but Mika is REALLY against HRC. She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed HRC had used a "personal" server at State. That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done. HRC can not be President. It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as Luddite. Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well. She just may move to Fox. Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough to call her on it? Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe it's the start of an MSNBC turn around. She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow. Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow! Mikek |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/15/15 2:47 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote: I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but Mika is REALLY against HRC. She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed HRC had used a "personal" server at State. That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done. HRC can not be President. It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as Luddite. Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well. She just may move to Fox. Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough to call her on it? Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe it's the start of an MSNBC turn around. She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow. Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow! Mikek Hahahahah...you're a pistol, Mikey. Rachel is hard for you to watch because, well, you'll figure it out or someone will tell you. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/15/2015 2:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/15/15 2:47 PM, amdx wrote: On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote: I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but Mika is REALLY against HRC. She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed HRC had used a "personal" server at State. That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done. HRC can not be President. It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as Luddite. Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well. She just may move to Fox. Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough to call her on it? Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe it's the start of an MSNBC turn around. She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow. Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow! Mikek Hahahahah...you're a pistol, Mikey. Rachel is hard for you to watch because, well, you'll figure it out or someone will tell you. Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often sarcastic) Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out. What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her? Mikek --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
amdx wrote:
On 8/15/2015 2:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/15/15 2:47 PM, amdx wrote: On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote: I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but Mika is REALLY against HRC. She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed HRC had used a "personal" server at State. That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done. HRC can not be President. It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as Luddite. Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well. She just may move to Fox. Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough to call her on it? Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe it's the start of an MSNBC turn around. She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow. Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow! Mikek Hahahahah...you're a pistol, Mikey. Rachel is hard for you to watch because, well, you'll figure it out or someone will tell you. Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often sarcastic) Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out. What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her? Mikek --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus You picked those reasons for your inability to comprehend. I had another reason for you in mind. -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/16/2015 10:40 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
amdx wrote: On 8/15/2015 2:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/15/15 2:47 PM, amdx wrote: On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote: I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but Mika is REALLY against HRC. She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed HRC had used a "personal" server at State. That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done. HRC can not be President. It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as Luddite. Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well. She just may move to Fox. Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough to call her on it? Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe it's the start of an MSNBC turn around. She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow. Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow! Mikek Hahahahah...you're a pistol, Mikey. Rachel is hard for you to watch because, well, you'll figure it out or someone will tell you. Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often sarcastic) Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out. What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her? Mikek --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus You picked those reasons for your inability to comprehend. I had another reason for you in mind. At least when Rachel says something the subject is clear. You write but there is no subject, it's like you are keeping a secret. When someone asks, you have no response. Mikek --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 10:52:10 -0500, amdx wrote:
You picked those reasons for your inability to comprehend. I had another reason for you in mind. At least when Rachel says something the subject is clear. You write but there is no subject, it's like you are keeping a secret. When someone asks, you have no response. Mikek === Mike, you are mud wrestling with a pig. The pig loves it and you'll get dirty. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The best of crazy... | General | |||
Crazy day | General | |||
Yes, they are crazy. | General | |||
Still crazy | General | |||
So what if she's crazy... | General |