The Weekly Standard’s Bill Kristol, the neocon who has been wrong about
just about everything, doesn’t think there are enough “quality�
candidates in the GOP field seeking the presidential nomination.

Seventeen isn’t enough, so he has been touting former Indiana Gov. Mitch
Daniels, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), Rep. Trey
Gowdy (R-S.C.), Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.), Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.),
retired Gen. Jack Keane, and, saving the best for last, Supreme Court
Justice Samuel Alito.

- - -

Samuel Alito...good grief.

On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:49:54 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

The Weekly Standard’s Bill Kristol, the neocon who has been wrong about
just about everything, doesn’t think there are enough “quality�
candidates in the GOP field seeking the presidential nomination.


Do you think there are any quality candidates in there?
(on either side for that matter)

Damn, If Trump is within single digits of Hillary in the CNN/ORC poll
and a majority of people do not trust Hillary we have a pretty weak
field.

On 8/24/15 7:22 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:49:54 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

The Weekly Standard’s Bill Kristol, the neocon who has been wrong about
just about everything, doesn’t think there are enough “quality�
candidates in the GOP field seeking the presidential nomination.


Do you think there are any quality candidates in there?
(on either side for that matter)

Damn, If Trump is within single digits of Hillary in the CNN/ORC poll
and a majority of people do not trust Hillary we have a pretty weak
field.



Quality candidate? Sure. Bernie Sanders. Winning candidate? Bernie? No.
On the other hand, there are no "quality candidates" on the GOP side.

On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:39:49 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/24/15 7:22 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:49:54 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

The Weekly Standard’s Bill Kristol, the neocon who has been wrong about
just about everything, doesn’t think there are enough “quality�
candidates in the GOP field seeking the presidential nomination.


Do you think there are any quality candidates in there?
(on either side for that matter)

Damn, If Trump is within single digits of Hillary in the CNN/ORC poll
and a majority of people do not trust Hillary we have a pretty weak
field.



Quality candidate? Sure. Bernie Sanders. Winning candidate? Bernie? No.
On the other hand, there are no "quality candidates" on the GOP side.

Can you imagine Bernie trying to deal with Putin? We already saw
Hillary **** it up.
He would be eating borscht out of Warren's skull.

On 8/24/15 9:40 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:39:49 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/24/15 7:22 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:49:54 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

The Weekly Standard’s Bill Kristol, the neocon who has been wrong about
just about everything, doesn’t think there are enough “quality�
candidates in the GOP field seeking the presidential nomination.


Do you think there are any quality candidates in there?
(on either side for that matter)

Damn, If Trump is within single digits of Hillary in the CNN/ORC poll
and a majority of people do not trust Hillary we have a pretty weak
field.



Quality candidate? Sure. Bernie Sanders. Winning candidate? Bernie? No.
On the other hand, there are no "quality candidates" on the GOP side.

Can you imagine Bernie trying to deal with Putin? We already saw
Hillary **** it up.
He would be eating borscht out of Warren's skull.


Oh, please. I wonder if half the GOP POTUS wannabe's could find Moscow
on a map without Sarah Palin's help.