On 8/26/15 12:20 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:02:53 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 8/26/15 11:50 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/26/2015 9:34 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 10:25 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/25/2015 8:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/25/15 9:08 PM, amdx wrote:

Wal-Mart.
They lose $3 Billion a year to theft. (Walmart)

Mikek




---

Gosh, no wonder the economy of Communist China is collapsing...it's
because of theft losses at its biggest 'Merican customer!

That would help the China economy. That shows your great understanding
of economics!
Are you endorsing the idea of not prosecuting shoplifters?

Mikek



Whoooooooosh...the sound irony makes as it whizzes between your ears.

As usual, you won't commit to an answer.
You'll note I wasn't the only one commenting on your lack of economic
logic.
Mikek


My post was intended as humorous irony. Apparently you and at least one
other poster took it seriously. It's not my job to help you attain your
goal as newsgroup dimwit, because that would be unfair to Ingerfool,
Herring the Racist, and Bilious.

Oh, China's economy...two of the reasons for its problems...massive
overcapacity and slowing demand within the country and worldwide for
what it is producing.

I'm not really concerned about Walmart's problems operating its sleazy
stores. Perhaps if they hired better and smarter people, paid them more,
and had more of them on duty, they could get their "shrinkage" under
control. I do of course care when decent businesses have such problems,
and think shoplifters ought to be prosecuted.



Better and smarter? And you call me racist?

What a hypocrite, Krause.
--


Oh, did I point out a particular race, or is it your implication that
Walmart only hires people of a particular race? That seems unlikely.

On 8/26/15 12:20 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:02:53 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Oh, China's economy...two of the reasons for its problems...massive
overcapacity and slowing demand within the country and worldwide for
what it is producing.

I would not expect a democrat to think debt was an issue at all.


I stated "two of the reasons." There are others, of course.

On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:25:31 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/26/15 12:20 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:02:53 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Oh, China's economy...two of the reasons for its problems...massive
overcapacity and slowing demand within the country and worldwide for
what it is producing.

I would not expect a democrat to think debt was an issue at all.


I stated "two of the reasons." There are others, of course.

All of the other reasons only contribute to the problems but the debt
makes it an immediate concern. The whole world has been kicking that
can down the road for 40 years and it is going to overwhelm us some
day. That day may not be that far off. It might be as simple as the
Saudis deciding to turn off the oil tap. They have gotten us addicted
to cheap oil again and we saw how that worked in the 70s when they
choked off supply. Guys like Bernie say the middle class never
recovered from the Ford/Carter crash and we are in a lot worse shape
now. The whole world is.

On 8/26/15 12:47 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:25:31 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/26/15 12:20 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:02:53 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Oh, China's economy...two of the reasons for its problems...massive
overcapacity and slowing demand within the country and worldwide for
what it is producing.

I would not expect a democrat to think debt was an issue at all.


I stated "two of the reasons." There are others, of course.

All of the other reasons only contribute to the problems but the debt
makes it an immediate concern. The whole world has been kicking that
can down the road for 40 years and it is going to overwhelm us some
day. That day may not be that far off. It might be as simple as the
Saudis deciding to turn off the oil tap. They have gotten us addicted
to cheap oil again and we saw how that worked in the 70s when they
choked off supply. Guys like Bernie say the middle class never
recovered from the Ford/Carter crash and we are in a lot worse shape
now. The whole world is.



And your solution to the debt mess that includes mass numbers of people
not starving and otherwise suffering horrifically while your solution is
underway...

On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:53:40 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/26/15 12:47 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:25:31 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/26/15 12:20 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:02:53 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Oh, China's economy...two of the reasons for its problems...massive
overcapacity and slowing demand within the country and worldwide for
what it is producing.

I would not expect a democrat to think debt was an issue at all.


I stated "two of the reasons." There are others, of course.

All of the other reasons only contribute to the problems but the debt
makes it an immediate concern. The whole world has been kicking that
can down the road for 40 years and it is going to overwhelm us some
day. That day may not be that far off. It might be as simple as the
Saudis deciding to turn off the oil tap. They have gotten us addicted
to cheap oil again and we saw how that worked in the 70s when they
choked off supply. Guys like Bernie say the middle class never
recovered from the Ford/Carter crash and we are in a lot worse shape
now. The whole world is.



And your solution to the debt mess that includes mass numbers of people
not starving and otherwise suffering horrifically while your solution is
underway...

"Starving" may make a good bumper sticker but it is not really that
much of an issue in the US. We do need to stop borrowing money tho.
This "zero interest rate" can't go on forever and when inflation
cranks up again, that debt will be unsustainable pretty quickly.
We haven't been able to count on China to buy our debt for several
years so the fed is just printing money to cover the shortfall. We
have gotten away from it so far but that will not last forever either.

Remember Weimar Germany

If starving is an issue, think about what will happen when the dollar
crashes and brings down the whole world economy.
You might even reconsider your stance on hunting when chicken costs
$150 a pound .. if you could find it and had $150.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 11:50 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/26/2015 9:34 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 10:25 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/25/2015 8:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/25/15 9:08 PM, amdx wrote:

Wal-Mart.
They lose $3 Billion a year to theft. (Walmart)

Mikek




---

Gosh, no wonder the economy of Communist China is collapsing...it's
because of theft losses at its biggest 'Merican customer!

That would help the China economy. That shows your great understanding
of economics!
Are you endorsing the idea of not prosecuting shoplifters?

Mikek



Whoooooooosh...the sound irony makes as it whizzes between your ears.

As usual, you won't commit to an answer.
You'll note I wasn't the only one commenting on your lack of economic
logic.
Mikek


My post was intended as humorous irony. Apparently you and at least one
other poster took it seriously. It's not my job to help you attain your
goal as newsgroup dimwit, because that would be unfair to Ingerfool,
Herring the Racist, and Bilious.

Oh, China's economy...two of the reasons for its problems...massive
overcapacity and slowing demand within the country and worldwide for what it is producing.

I'm not really concerned about Walmart's problems operating its sleazy
stores. Perhaps if they hired better and smarter people, paid them more,
and had more of them on duty, they could get their "shrinkage" under
control. I do of course care when decent businesses have such problems,
and think shoplifters ought to be prosecuted.

No your reply showed why you have had to file multiple bankruptcies.

On 8/26/2015 2:59 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 11:50 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/26/2015 9:34 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 10:25 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/25/2015 8:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/25/15 9:08 PM, amdx wrote:

Wal-Mart.
They lose $3 Billion a year to theft. (Walmart)

Mikek




---

Gosh, no wonder the economy of Communist China is collapsing...it's
because of theft losses at its biggest 'Merican customer!

That would help the China economy. That shows your great understanding
of economics!
Are you endorsing the idea of not prosecuting shoplifters?

Mikek



Whoooooooosh...the sound irony makes as it whizzes between your ears.

As usual, you won't commit to an answer.
You'll note I wasn't the only one commenting on your lack of economic
logic.
Mikek


My post was intended as humorous irony. Apparently you and at least one
other poster took it seriously. It's not my job to help you attain your
goal as newsgroup dimwit, because that would be unfair to Ingerfool,
Herring the Racist, and Bilious.

Oh, China's economy...two of the reasons for its problems...massive
overcapacity and slowing demand within the country and worldwide for what it is producing.

I'm not really concerned about Walmart's problems operating its sleazy
stores. Perhaps if they hired better and smarter people, paid them more,
and had more of them on duty, they could get their "shrinkage" under
control. I do of course care when decent businesses have such problems,
and think shoplifters ought to be prosecuted.

No your reply showed why you have had to file multiple bankruptcies.

Deadbeats ought to be prosecuted too. I can't remember the last time
KKKrause said something funny, intentionally.

On 8/26/2015 11:02 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 11:50 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/26/2015 9:34 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 10:25 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/25/2015 8:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/25/15 9:08 PM, amdx wrote:

Wal-Mart.
They lose $3 Billion a year to theft. (Walmart)

Mikek




---

Gosh, no wonder the economy of Communist China is collapsing...it's
because of theft losses at its biggest 'Merican customer!

That would help the China economy. That shows your great
understanding
of economics!
Are you endorsing the idea of not prosecuting shoplifters?

Mikek



Whoooooooosh...the sound irony makes as it whizzes between your ears.

As usual, you won't commit to an answer.
You'll note I wasn't the only one commenting on your lack of economic
logic.
Mikek


My post was intended as humorous irony. Apparently you and at least one
other poster took it seriously.

In your mind it may have been humorous irony, but it was neither.
You might reread what was said and you will see, your response was
senseless.
Mike


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

On 8/26/15 4:37 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/26/2015 11:02 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:


As usual, you won't commit to an answer.
You'll note I wasn't the only one commenting on your lack of economic
logic.
Mikek


My post was intended as humorous irony. Apparently you and at least one
other poster took it seriously.

In your mind it may have been humorous irony, but it was neither.
You might reread what was said and you will see, your response was
senseless.
Mike



Oh, okay, Mikey. Call back when the fog lifts. If it ever lifts.

On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:37:56 -0500, amdx wrote:

On 8/26/2015 11:02 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 11:50 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/26/2015 9:34 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 10:25 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/25/2015 8:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/25/15 9:08 PM, amdx wrote:

Wal-Mart.
They lose $3 Billion a year to theft. (Walmart)

Mikek




---

Gosh, no wonder the economy of Communist China is collapsing...it's
because of theft losses at its biggest 'Merican customer!

That would help the China economy. That shows your great
understanding
of economics!
Are you endorsing the idea of not prosecuting shoplifters?

Mikek



Whoooooooosh...the sound irony makes as it whizzes between your ears.

As usual, you won't commit to an answer.
You'll note I wasn't the only one commenting on your lack of economic
logic.
Mikek


My post was intended as humorous irony. Apparently you and at least one
other poster took it seriously.

In your mind it may have been humorous irony, but it was neither.
You might reread what was said and you will see, your response was
senseless.
Mike


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

Yeah, but he does a great tap dance!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!