About Us

Justan Olphart[_2_]

On 8/27/2015 3:45 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:25:53 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

We have not had a POTUS that is prepared to e commander in chief for a lot
of POTUS's.

Since the 60s the only one I can think of is RR.

Who was the one in the 60s? Nixon? It certainly wasn't the other two.

I am not even that sure I would put Reagan on the list. Maybe GHWB ...
until he screwed up and did not get the hell out of there after he won
the war we went to fight. That bumped him off my list, along with
everyone since..

RR is the only one on the list.

[email protected]

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:37:17 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 8/27/2015 3:45 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:25:53 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

We have not had a POTUS that is prepared to e commander in chief for a lot
of POTUS's.

Since the 60s the only one I can think of is RR.

Who was the one in the 60s? Nixon? It certainly wasn't the other two.

I am not even that sure I would put Reagan on the list. Maybe GHWB ...
until he screwed up and did not get the hell out of there after he won
the war we went to fight. That bumped him off my list, along with
everyone since..

RR is the only one on the list.

Reagan spent too much money on dead end DoD projects. I suppose you
could say it was a down payment on bankrupting the Soviets but I think
they were on borrowed time, even without Star Wars.
I am also not sure we are better off without them. We traded Gorbachev
for Putin and inherited all of the factional fighting in the Bulkans.
I also wonder if we did the wrong thing pumping up OBL and his Taliban
gang in Afghanistan.
We should have just let the Soviets grind themselves down there.

Sometimes a dictator holding down terrorists is a good thing,
particularly if we can just watch from 8,000 miles away and stay out
of it.

Keyser SÃ¶ze

On 8/27/15 6:39 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:37:17 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 8/27/2015 3:45 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:25:53 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

We have not had a POTUS that is prepared to e commander in chief for a lot
of POTUS's.

Since the 60s the only one I can think of is RR.

Who was the one in the 60s? Nixon? It certainly wasn't the other two.

I am not even that sure I would put Reagan on the list. Maybe GHWB ...
until he screwed up and did not get the hell out of there after he won
the war we went to fight. That bumped him off my list, along with
everyone since..

RR is the only one on the list.

Reagan spent too much money on dead end DoD projects. I suppose you
could say it was a down payment on bankrupting the Soviets but I think
they were on borrowed time, even without Star Wars.
I am also not sure we are better off without them. We traded Gorbachev
for Putin and inherited all of the factional fighting in the Bulkans.
I also wonder if we did the wrong thing pumping up OBL and his Taliban
gang in Afghanistan.
We should have just let the Soviets grind themselves down there.

Sometimes a dictator holding down terrorists is a good thing,
particularly if we can just watch from 8,000 miles away and stay out
of it.

Ronald Reagan...hehehe. The goof who sold deadly arms to our enemy, the
Iranians, violating the law, and then used the money to help the Contras
toss out their government, and suffered from Alzheimers in his 2nd term.
Yeah, that's the ticket. L(

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Not really funny, yet...	F.O.A.D.	General	5	May 7th 13 02:32 PM
Too funny...	Wizard of Woodstock	General	7	July 30th 09 12:52 AM
Funny	Jim	General	0	December 20th 08 05:57 PM
I'm sorry - this is just too funny...	Tom Francis - SWSports	General	15	November 30th 08 04:03 AM
This is too funny!	[email protected]	General	1	September 27th 08 02:18 AM

Menu

About Us