On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:34:21 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote:

On 9/22/2015 7:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 19:11:29 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 9/21/15 6:39 PM, True North wrote:
FlatulenceJim stinks out the joint...

"Donnie will be the first to feel the aftermath of that dangerous move."

Well, the Floriduh UnFunny Man dumps more of his toilet humour.



Be on the lookout...he's just the sort of guy who would drive his RV up
to where you live and dump its holding tank in a fresh water reservoir...


Recreational dumping. Probably as legal as dumping in the harbor.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

Remember the suitcase toilet that Harry used to take along when his wife
went boating with him. I wonder if he made her clean it out after she
used it?

Knowing Harry, he probably just emptied it in the bay...if his wife ever went with
him in the first place. He'd be hard to take for more than a very few minutes on a
small boat, unless she had headphones, of course.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:26:44 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:05:00 -0400, John H.
wrote:

I like Dr Ben. He's no politician but that's a big part of his appeal
I think. Unfortunately it's also going to limit his campaign. All of
the Republican candidates seem to have this uncanny ability to
needlessly offend broad segments of the electorate. If Biden decides
to run and gets the (D) nomination, I'd be inclined to vote for him.

Nope. Except for Trump, I'd vote for any of the top four Republicans before Biden. I
like Carson. It's a shame the majority of the electorate will hear and believe, like
Krause, the misquotes and meaning of what Carson said. We just have to do what we can
to overcome stupidity.

===

Old saying: You can't fix stupid.

N.B. I didn't say 'fix'!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

On 9/22/15 4:31 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:56:30 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 9/22/15 3:52 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:41:57 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 9/22/15 1:09 PM, wrote:

In addition to other very liberal objectives Patrick proposed and pushed
for some extremely restrictive gun laws in a state that already has very
restrictive laws regarding firearms. There were several that
he proposed or endorsed ranging from a limit of one gun purchase per
month, a long waiting period and the imposition of a large tax on
ammunition ... all in an attempt to discourage private gun ownership.
Fortunately, even in liberal Massachusetts, his proposals were soundly
rejected.



Good to know. It is really not unusual for a northeastern democrat
tho. What else?



Right, because nothing is more important than...guns.

Except maybe abortion and neither are a reason to select a
presidential candidate.

What is (s)he going to do about Putin, Assad, Netanyahu and the rest
of the bomb throwers in the world?
How will they stimulate the economy and what are they doing about the
debt?
How are they going to deal with the fact that we are rapidly running
out of water?

Those are the issues that are going to doom my grand children if they
are not dealt with.


Perhaps the Libertarian candidate of your choice will have the answers
to the pressing issues you raise.

Oh, wait.


I am not sure there is a libertarian candidate yet but they would
definitely be better on the money issues. The foreign policy is more
likely to be better.

Really? I don't see how, since they ain't gonna be elected.

On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 18:06:08 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 9/22/15 4:31 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:56:30 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 9/22/15 3:52 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:41:57 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 9/22/15 1:09 PM, wrote:

In addition to other very liberal objectives Patrick proposed and pushed
for some extremely restrictive gun laws in a state that already has very
restrictive laws regarding firearms. There were several that
he proposed or endorsed ranging from a limit of one gun purchase per
month, a long waiting period and the imposition of a large tax on
ammunition ... all in an attempt to discourage private gun ownership.
Fortunately, even in liberal Massachusetts, his proposals were soundly
rejected.



Good to know. It is really not unusual for a northeastern democrat
tho. What else?



Right, because nothing is more important than...guns.

Except maybe abortion and neither are a reason to select a
presidential candidate.

What is (s)he going to do about Putin, Assad, Netanyahu and the rest
of the bomb throwers in the world?
How will they stimulate the economy and what are they doing about the
debt?
How are they going to deal with the fact that we are rapidly running
out of water?

Those are the issues that are going to doom my grand children if they
are not dealt with.


Perhaps the Libertarian candidate of your choice will have the answers
to the pressing issues you raise.

Oh, wait.


I am not sure there is a libertarian candidate yet but they would
definitely be better on the money issues. The foreign policy is more
likely to be better.

Really? I don't see how, since they ain't gonna be elected.

Trump isn't going to be elected either but that doesn't stop you from
talking about him.

You are the one who brought up the libertarians. If it didn't matter,
were you just trolling again?

True North wrote:
Keyser Söze
- hide quoted text -
On 9/21/15 6:39 PM, True North wrote:
FlatulenceJim stinks out the joint...

"Donnie will be the first to feel the aftermath of that dangerous move."

Well, the Floriduh UnFunny Man dumps more of his toilet humour.


"Be on the lookout...he's just the sort of guy who would drive his RV up
to where you live and dump its holding tank in a fresh water reservoir... "



No problem...we'll bag him and ship him up go Dickson as a Halloween treat. I'm sure the two of them could make sweet polka music all night long.


"ship him up go Dickson"??? You had to post that twice?

I suppose I should be thankful it did.

On 9/27/2015 8:55 AM, Tim wrote:
I suppose I should be thankful it did.

Is there some way you can teach Gookle to quote what you are responding to?