Marco Rubio is a U.S. senator. And he just can’t stand it anymore.

“I don’t know that ‘hate’ is the right word,� Rubio said in an
interview. “I’m frustrated.�

This year, as Rubio runs for president, he has cast the Senate — the
very place that cemented him as a national politician — as a place he’s
given up on, after less than one term. It’s too slow. Too rule-bound. So
Rubio, 44, has decided not to run for his seat again. It’s the White
House or bust.

“That’s why I’m missing votes. Because I am leaving the Senate. I am not
running for reelection,� Rubio said in the last Republican debate, after
Donald Trump had mocked him for his unusual number of absences during
Senate votes.

http://tinyurl.com/neoxzk6

On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:50:16 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 10/26/15 11:41 AM, wrote:

Scott has actually done a fairly good job, not that it really matters
to you since you don't live here.


Whether Scott has done "a fairly good job" by your standards is not
relevant to his criminal past, which was what my comment was about.


I really don't give a ****. If he is stealing for us now, I am OK with
it. Better inside the tent ****ing out...

And Rubio, crikey, he seems as clueless in his own ways as as Trump and
Carson. Does Rubio still think we should have the same policies towards
Cuba as we did 53 years ago? That the minimum wage should be the same as
it was 20 years ago, or that it should be eliminated entirely? That gays
are second class citizens? That the government should be able to control
a woman's body? That all the world's problems can be resolved by
dropping bombs everywhere?

I never said I liked Rubio, I was just speculating what he might do.

On 10/26/15 12:35 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:50:16 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 10/26/15 11:41 AM, wrote:

Scott has actually done a fairly good job, not that it really matters
to you since you don't live here.


Whether Scott has done "a fairly good job" by your standards is not
relevant to his criminal past, which was what my comment was about.


I really don't give a ****. If he is stealing for us now, I am OK with
it. Better inside the tent ****ing out...

And Rubio, crikey, he seems as clueless in his own ways as as Trump and
Carson. Does Rubio still think we should have the same policies towards
Cuba as we did 53 years ago? That the minimum wage should be the same as
it was 20 years ago, or that it should be eliminated entirely? That gays
are second class citizens? That the government should be able to control
a woman's body? That all the world's problems can be resolved by
dropping bombs everywhere?

I never said I liked Rubio, I was just speculating what he might do.



Rubio seems to be "talked up" as the GOPer nominee if and when Trump and
Carson FOAD. Unless, of course, it is Ted Cruz. Heh heh heh heh.

On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:40:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 10/26/15 12:35 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:50:16 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 10/26/15 11:41 AM, wrote:

Scott has actually done a fairly good job, not that it really matters
to you since you don't live here.


Whether Scott has done "a fairly good job" by your standards is not
relevant to his criminal past, which was what my comment was about.


I really don't give a ****. If he is stealing for us now, I am OK with
it. Better inside the tent ****ing out...

And Rubio, crikey, he seems as clueless in his own ways as as Trump and
Carson. Does Rubio still think we should have the same policies towards
Cuba as we did 53 years ago? That the minimum wage should be the same as
it was 20 years ago, or that it should be eliminated entirely? That gays
are second class citizens? That the government should be able to control
a woman's body? That all the world's problems can be resolved by
dropping bombs everywhere?

I never said I liked Rubio, I was just speculating what he might do.



Rubio seems to be "talked up" as the GOPer nominee if and when Trump and
Carson FOAD. Unless, of course, it is Ted Cruz. Heh heh heh heh.

I am not a fan of any of them but I would not be surprised if this
ends up being a brokered convention.
I doubt Trump or Carson will have enough delegates for a first round
win.

On 10/26/15 3:31 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:40:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 10/26/15 12:35 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:50:16 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 10/26/15 11:41 AM, wrote:

Scott has actually done a fairly good job, not that it really matters
to you since you don't live here.


Whether Scott has done "a fairly good job" by your standards is not
relevant to his criminal past, which was what my comment was about.


I really don't give a ****. If he is stealing for us now, I am OK with
it. Better inside the tent ****ing out...

And Rubio, crikey, he seems as clueless in his own ways as as Trump and
Carson. Does Rubio still think we should have the same policies towards
Cuba as we did 53 years ago? That the minimum wage should be the same as
it was 20 years ago, or that it should be eliminated entirely? That gays
are second class citizens? That the government should be able to control
a woman's body? That all the world's problems can be resolved by
dropping bombs everywhere?

I never said I liked Rubio, I was just speculating what he might do.



Rubio seems to be "talked up" as the GOPer nominee if and when Trump and
Carson FOAD. Unless, of course, it is Ted Cruz. Heh heh heh heh.

I am not a fan of any of them but I would not be surprised if this
ends up being a brokered convention.
I doubt Trump or Carson will have enough delegates for a first round
win.


I'm not sure why you give a **** about things political on the national
scene, since you'll have no cards in the game, other than the "gripe"
and "they're all the same" cards.

Whoever the Repubs nominate will be a right-wing demagogue, because that
is what all the "frontrunners" are and the chosen one will lose in the
general election. My interest in their choosing is to see whether
they'll go for the craziest ones in the bunch. I sure hope so. But I'm
just not sure who the craziest one is...is it Carson? Is it Cruz? Is It
Huckabee?

- show quoted text -
I'm not sure why you give a **** about things political on the national
scene, since you'll have no cards in the game, other than the "gripe"
and "they're all the same" cards.

.............

Harry I don't know why you do either

On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 15:47:09 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 10/26/15 3:31 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:40:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 10/26/15 12:35 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:50:16 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 10/26/15 11:41 AM, wrote:

Scott has actually done a fairly good job, not that it really matters
to you since you don't live here.


Whether Scott has done "a fairly good job" by your standards is not
relevant to his criminal past, which was what my comment was about.


I really don't give a ****. If he is stealing for us now, I am OK with
it. Better inside the tent ****ing out...

And Rubio, crikey, he seems as clueless in his own ways as as Trump and
Carson. Does Rubio still think we should have the same policies towards
Cuba as we did 53 years ago? That the minimum wage should be the same as
it was 20 years ago, or that it should be eliminated entirely? That gays
are second class citizens? That the government should be able to control
a woman's body? That all the world's problems can be resolved by
dropping bombs everywhere?

I never said I liked Rubio, I was just speculating what he might do.



Rubio seems to be "talked up" as the GOPer nominee if and when Trump and
Carson FOAD. Unless, of course, it is Ted Cruz. Heh heh heh heh.

I am not a fan of any of them but I would not be surprised if this
ends up being a brokered convention.
I doubt Trump or Carson will have enough delegates for a first round
win.


I'm not sure why you give a **** about things political on the national
scene, since you'll have no cards in the game, other than the "gripe"
and "they're all the same" cards.

Whoever the Repubs nominate will be a right-wing demagogue, because that
is what all the "frontrunners" are and the chosen one will lose in the
general election. My interest in their choosing is to see whether
they'll go for the craziest ones in the bunch. I sure hope so. But I'm
just not sure who the craziest one is...is it Carson? Is it Cruz? Is It
Huckabee?


It's funny that you criticize me for saying they are all the same,
then you show me they are all the same.

wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 15:47:09 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 10/26/15 3:31 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:40:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 10/26/15 12:35 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:50:16 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 10/26/15 11:41 AM, wrote:

Scott has actually done a fairly good job, not that it really matters
to you since you don't live here.


Whether Scott has done "a fairly good job" by your standards is not
relevant to his criminal past, which was what my comment was about.


I really don't give a ****. If he is stealing for us now, I am OK with
it. Better inside the tent ****ing out...

And Rubio, crikey, he seems as clueless in his own ways as as Trump and
Carson. Does Rubio still think we should have the same policies towards
Cuba as we did 53 years ago? That the minimum wage should be the same as
it was 20 years ago, or that it should be eliminated entirely? That gays
are second class citizens? That the government should be able to control
a woman's body? That all the world's problems can be resolved by
dropping bombs everywhere?

I never said I liked Rubio, I was just speculating what he might do.



Rubio seems to be "talked up" as the GOPer nominee if and when Trump and
Carson FOAD. Unless, of course, it is Ted Cruz. Heh heh heh heh.

I am not a fan of any of them but I would not be surprised if this
ends up being a brokered convention.
I doubt Trump or Carson will have enough delegates for a first round
win.


I'm not sure why you give a **** about things political on the national
scene, since you'll have no cards in the game, other than the "gripe"
and "they're all the same" cards.

Whoever the Repubs nominate will be a right-wing demagogue, because that
is what all the "frontrunners" are and the chosen one will lose in the
general election. My interest in their choosing is to see whether
they'll go for the craziest ones in the bunch. I sure hope so. But I'm
just not sure who the craziest one is...is it Carson? Is it Cruz? Is It
Huckabee?


It's funny that you criticize me for saying they are all the same,
then you show me they are all the same.


They share attributes but they are not all the same. 😉

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+