|
harry
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:55:06 -0500, John H.
wrote: On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:41:49 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:28:10 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam. === If you'd been there Harry we might have turned it around. You could have headed up the disinformation corps. He says he was there, but that may have been disinformation. === No question. He's the perfect candidate for the job in my mind. |
harry
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:13:59 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:55:06 -0500, John H. wrote: On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:41:49 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:28:10 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam. === If you'd been there Harry we might have turned it around. You could have headed up the disinformation corps. He says he was there, but that may have been disinformation. === No question. He's the perfect candidate for the job in my mind. CB already proved his perfection. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
harry
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:41:49 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:28:10 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam. === If you'd been there Harry we might have turned it around. You could have headed up the disinformation corps. If you look closely you will see him on the other side of that AA gun Jane was sitting on. |
harry
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 9:03 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote: Harry is a Nobody. Nobody is Perfect. Therefore Harry is Perfect. Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with syllogisms, eh, Bilious? I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification. Who or what is "Raheem"? He is a Rather, spell correctors brother. |
harry
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/30/15 9:26 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:57:09 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote: Harry is a Nobody. Nobody is Perfect. Therefore Harry is Perfect. Harry will argue that conclusion, fitting though it may be. -- Ban idiots, not guns! No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam. We lost t because of LBJ, a democrat, running the war. Actually micromanaging. |
harry
Califbill billnews wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/29/15 9:03 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote: Harry is a Nobody. Nobody is Perfect. Therefore Harry is Perfect. Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with syllogisms, eh, Bilious? I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification. Who or what is "Raheem"? He is a Rather, spell correctors brother. Try English. -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ |
harry
Keyser Söze wrote:
Califbill billnews wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/29/15 9:03 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote: Harry is a Nobody. Nobody is Perfect. Therefore Harry is Perfect. Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with syllogisms, eh, Bilious? I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification. Who or what is "Raheem"? He is a Rather, spell correctors brother. Try English. Try thinking. |
harry
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 09:45:26 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/30/15 9:26 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:57:09 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote: Harry is a Nobody. Nobody is Perfect. Therefore Harry is Perfect. Harry will argue that conclusion, fitting though it may be. -- Ban idiots, not guns! No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam. We lost t because of LBJ, a democrat, running the war. Actually micromanaging. === The same democrat who escalated the conflict into a full blown war by lying about the Gulf of Tonkin incidents. Maybe Harry *was* there. |
harry
Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 09:45:26 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/30/15 9:26 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:57:09 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote: Harry is a Nobody. Nobody is Perfect. Therefore Harry is Perfect. Harry will argue that conclusion, fitting though it may be. -- Ban idiots, not guns! No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam. We lost t because of LBJ, a democrat, running the war. Actually micromanaging. === The same democrat who escalated the conflict into a full blown war by lying about the Gulf of Tonkin incidents. Maybe Harry *was* there. Harry was probably the Presidents personal representative on the warship. |
harry
On 12/30/15 1:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: Califbill billnews wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/29/15 9:03 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote: Harry is a Nobody. Nobody is Perfect. Therefore Harry is Perfect. Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with syllogisms, eh, Bilious? I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification. Who or what is "Raheem"? He is a Rather, spell correctors brother. Try English. Try thinking. I do think. Your comment still makes no sense. Are you trying to say your comment was "rather appropriate," and a spell checker changed rather to Raheem? That seems a stretch. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com