On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:55:06 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:41:49 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:28:10 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam.

===

If you'd been there Harry we might have turned it around. You could
have headed up the disinformation corps.

He says he was there, but that may have been disinformation.

===

No question. He's the perfect candidate for the job in my mind.

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:13:59 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:55:06 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:41:49 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:28:10 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam.

===

If you'd been there Harry we might have turned it around. You could
have headed up the disinformation corps.

He says he was there, but that may have been disinformation.

===

No question. He's the perfect candidate for the job in my mind.

CB already proved his perfection.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:41:49 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:28:10 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam.

===

If you'd been there Harry we might have turned it around. You could
have headed up the disinformation corps.

If you look closely you will see him on the other side of that AA gun
Jane was sitting on.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 9:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?


I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification.


Who or what is "Raheem"?


He is a Rather, spell correctors brother.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/30/15 9:26 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:57:09 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:



Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.

Harry will argue that conclusion, fitting though it may be.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam.


We lost t because of LBJ, a democrat, running the war. Actually
micromanaging.

Califbill billnews wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 9:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?


I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification.


Who or what is "Raheem"?


He is a Rather, spell correctors brother.



Try English.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Keyser Söze wrote:
Califbill billnews wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 9:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?


I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification.


Who or what is "Raheem"?


He is a Rather, spell correctors brother.



Try English.


Try thinking.

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 09:45:26 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/30/15 9:26 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:57:09 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:



Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.

Harry will argue that conclusion, fitting though it may be.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam.


We lost t because of LBJ, a democrat, running the war. Actually
micromanaging.

===

The same democrat who escalated the conflict into a full blown war by
lying about the Gulf of Tonkin incidents. Maybe Harry *was* there.

Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 09:45:26 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/30/15 9:26 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:57:09 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:



Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.

Harry will argue that conclusion, fitting though it may be.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam.


We lost t because of LBJ, a democrat, running the war. Actually
micromanaging.

===

The same democrat who escalated the conflict into a full blown war by
lying about the Gulf of Tonkin incidents. Maybe Harry *was* there.


Harry was probably the Presidents personal representative on the warship.

On 12/30/15 1:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
Califbill billnews wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 9:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?


I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification.


Who or what is "Raheem"?


He is a Rather, spell correctors brother.



Try English.


Try thinking.


I do think. Your comment still makes no sense. Are you trying to say
your comment was "rather appropriate," and a spell checker changed
rather to Raheem? That seems a stretch.