harry
 

Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.

harry
 

On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?

harry
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?


I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification.

harry
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?


I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification.

harry
 

On 12/29/15 9:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?


I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification.


Who or what is "Raheem"?

harry
 

On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:57:09 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:



Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.

Harry will argue that conclusion, fitting though it may be.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

harry
 

On 12/30/15 9:26 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:57:09 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:



Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.

Harry will argue that conclusion, fitting though it may be.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam.

harry
 

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:28:10 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 12/30/15 9:26 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:57:09 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:



Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.

Harry will argue that conclusion, fitting though it may be.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam.

Perhaps if you'd done your job over there a bit better?
:)
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

harry
 

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:28:10 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam.

===

If you'd been there Harry we might have turned it around. You could
have headed up the disinformation corps.

harry
 

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:41:49 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:28:10 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam.

===

If you'd been there Harry we might have turned it around. You could
have headed up the disinformation corps.

He says he was there, but that may have been disinformation.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!