....to see which of them would have prevented the mass shootings.

http://tinyurl.com/h95cb2d

It will be even more interesting to see which of them will make our government
bigger!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

John H. wrote:
...to see which of them would have prevented the mass shootings.

http://tinyurl.com/h95cb2d

It will be even more interesting to see which of them will make our government
bigger!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Yes, rule by fiat. Forget about the other branches of government.

On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 10:01:05 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

John H. wrote:
...to see which of them would have prevented the mass shootings.

http://tinyurl.com/h95cb2d

It will be even more interesting to see which of them will make our government
bigger!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Yes, rule by fiat. Forget about the other branches of government.
I guess he stalled around long enough that he will be out of office
before the courts sort this mess out. One thing he said, can be done
and should. Prosecute the ones who try to buy guns and are prohibited.
That will either put some bad guys in jail or fix the flawed lists.
Again we would be fixing a flawed government process in the courts.

On 1/1/2016 1:01 PM, Califbill wrote:
John H. wrote:
...to see which of them would have prevented the mass shootings.

http://tinyurl.com/h95cb2d

It will be even more interesting to see which of them will make our government
bigger!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Yes, rule by fiat. Forget about the other branches of government.

I hope congress is keeping track of all the O'Bama poop they are going
to have to flush when he's retired.

On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:32:37 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 10:01:05 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

John H. wrote:
...to see which of them would have prevented the mass shootings.

http://tinyurl.com/h95cb2d

It will be even more interesting to see which of them will make our government
bigger!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Yes, rule by fiat. Forget about the other branches of government.
I guess he stalled around long enough that he will be out of office
before the courts sort this mess out. One thing he said, can be done
and should. Prosecute the ones who try to buy guns and are prohibited.
That will either put some bad guys in jail or fix the flawed lists.
Again we would be fixing a flawed government process in the courts.

Enforcing the existing laws is a no-brainer. Wonder why it took him so long to think
of it.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 07:51:18 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:32:37 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 10:01:05 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

John H. wrote:
...to see which of them would have prevented the mass shootings.

http://tinyurl.com/h95cb2d

It will be even more interesting to see which of them will make our government
bigger!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Yes, rule by fiat. Forget about the other branches of government.
I guess he stalled around long enough that he will be out of office
before the courts sort this mess out. One thing he said, can be done
and should. Prosecute the ones who try to buy guns and are prohibited.
That will either put some bad guys in jail or fix the flawed lists.
Again we would be fixing a flawed government process in the courts.

Enforcing the existing laws is a no-brainer. Wonder why it took him so long to think
of it.

They would rather have the issue than to find a solution. It is
politics as usual.

On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 15:16:57 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

+-

I suspect the only effect would be a whole lot more people having an
FFL, a bigger ATF and more revenue for the government. It still does
nothing to stop the illegal trade because it is already illegal.


It is not easy to get an FFL...

Certainly a lot easier than a CCW in Md.
You just need a clean record, a place of business and a check.

On 1/2/16 6:08 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 15:16:57 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

+-

I suspect the only effect would be a whole lot more people having an
FFL, a bigger ATF and more revenue for the government. It still does
nothing to stop the illegal trade because it is already illegal.


It is not easy to get an FFL...

Certainly a lot easier than a CCW in Md.
You just need a clean record, a place of business and a check.



A friend of mine who runs a nice sporting, tackle, long rifle store and
has for 25 years, said it took nearly nine months for his handgun FFL to
be processed. I think it is a little more difficult than you think, but
maybe not in Florida. Dunno. Are there any real regs in Florida?

On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 18:58:15 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 1/2/16 6:08 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 15:16:57 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

+-

I suspect the only effect would be a whole lot more people having an
FFL, a bigger ATF and more revenue for the government. It still does
nothing to stop the illegal trade because it is already illegal.


It is not easy to get an FFL...

Certainly a lot easier than a CCW in Md.
You just need a clean record, a place of business and a check.



A friend of mine who runs a nice sporting, tackle, long rifle store and
has for 25 years, said it took nearly nine months for his handgun FFL to
be processed. I think it is a little more difficult than you think, but
maybe not in Florida. Dunno. Are there any real regs in Florida?

This is a FEDERAL license. (so "Florida" was just a troll)
Nobody said it was FAST, just not that HARD.

This is the application. It has not changed much if at all between now
and the one I filled out in 1989. The fees sound higher but I am not
sure.

https://www.atf.gov/file/61506/download

On 1/2/2016 9:25 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 18:58:15 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 1/2/16 6:08 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 15:16:57 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

+-

I suspect the only effect would be a whole lot more people having an
FFL, a bigger ATF and more revenue for the government. It still does
nothing to stop the illegal trade because it is already illegal.


It is not easy to get an FFL...

Certainly a lot easier than a CCW in Md.
You just need a clean record, a place of business and a check.



A friend of mine who runs a nice sporting, tackle, long rifle store and
has for 25 years, said it took nearly nine months for his handgun FFL to
be processed. I think it is a little more difficult than you think, but
maybe not in Florida. Dunno. Are there any real regs in Florida?

This is a FEDERAL license. (so "Florida" was just a troll)
Nobody said it was FAST, just not that HARD.

This is the application. It has not changed much if at all between now
and the one I filled out in 1989. The fees sound higher but I am not
sure.

https://www.atf.gov/file/61506/download

If Harry could get a Maryland carry permit anyone could get a FFL. Harry
says it was easy peasy to get a carry permit. I don't know if I believe
his story though.