| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#32
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Are there any ghettos...
On 1/4/2016 8:28 PM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:58:21 -0500, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 4:52 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:30:17 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:16:00 -0500, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 15:57:37 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:29:02 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:19:40 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 12:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:09:22 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 9:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 9:10 AM, John H. wrote: I looked again, but could find nothing approaching 'racism' in the original question. Does Democrat control of ghettos automatically spell racism in some way? Perhaps some of the other experts on 'racism' could chime in. -- Blow that dog whistle, Herring. Local democratic politicians presiding over every known large ghetto area in America should not be construed to relate Democrats to racism. It's just a coincidence. Oh. I would think that fostering policies which keep the ghettos full *could* be considered racism, especially if the ghetto occupants are black. I suppose Krause considers use of the words ghetto and Democrat together is automatic 'racism'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Probably Krause associates black and ghetto together. Whether that's racist, I don't know. Ironic since "ghetto" is an Italian word derived from latin === Ghettos at varios times and various places have been associated with a lot of different ethnicities. One common definition goes like this: --- A section of a city, especially a thickly populated slum area, inhabited predominantly by members of an ethnic or other minority group, often as a result of social or economic restrictions, pressures, or hardships. --- The word seems to imply an economic distinction more than racial or ethnic. Since Democrats like to fancy themselves as champions of the downtrodden, it makes sense that they would identify with ghettos. Of course since the vast majority of working americans do not identify with ghettos it would seem to put democrats somewhere out in left field politically so to speak. Well, I'm guessing that the answer to my question is, "No". === Harry's opinions are just that. Which reminds me that opinions are like arse'ls, everybody has one. Harry never showed the balls to answer the question. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Once again, it has nothing to do with balls or anything other than my refusal to play your stupid trolling games. ...says the troll king and master of debt avoidance. :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! Speaking of Harry's balls. Did he ever tell you the story about the time he TRIED to beat up on a short scrawny guy because the little guy was allegedly harassing his wife or girlfriend? Unfortunately that heroic venture ended up with Harry getting medical attention for broken bones. Wouldn't you have liked to be a fly on the wall at the mall when Harry swung with all his might and couldn't knock the little guy down. |
|
#33
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Are there any ghettos...
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 06:30:20 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 1/4/2016 8:28 PM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:58:21 -0500, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 4:52 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:30:17 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:16:00 -0500, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 15:57:37 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:29:02 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:19:40 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 12:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:09:22 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 9:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 9:10 AM, John H. wrote: I looked again, but could find nothing approaching 'racism' in the original question. Does Democrat control of ghettos automatically spell racism in some way? Perhaps some of the other experts on 'racism' could chime in. -- Blow that dog whistle, Herring. Local democratic politicians presiding over every known large ghetto area in America should not be construed to relate Democrats to racism. It's just a coincidence. Oh. I would think that fostering policies which keep the ghettos full *could* be considered racism, especially if the ghetto occupants are black. I suppose Krause considers use of the words ghetto and Democrat together is automatic 'racism'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Probably Krause associates black and ghetto together. Whether that's racist, I don't know. Ironic since "ghetto" is an Italian word derived from latin === Ghettos at varios times and various places have been associated with a lot of different ethnicities. One common definition goes like this: --- A section of a city, especially a thickly populated slum area, inhabited predominantly by members of an ethnic or other minority group, often as a result of social or economic restrictions, pressures, or hardships. --- The word seems to imply an economic distinction more than racial or ethnic. Since Democrats like to fancy themselves as champions of the downtrodden, it makes sense that they would identify with ghettos. Of course since the vast majority of working americans do not identify with ghettos it would seem to put democrats somewhere out in left field politically so to speak. Well, I'm guessing that the answer to my question is, "No". === Harry's opinions are just that. Which reminds me that opinions are like arse'ls, everybody has one. Harry never showed the balls to answer the question. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Once again, it has nothing to do with balls or anything other than my refusal to play your stupid trolling games. ...says the troll king and master of debt avoidance. :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! Speaking of Harry's balls. Did he ever tell you the story about the time he TRIED to beat up on a short scrawny guy because the little guy was allegedly harassing his wife or girlfriend? Unfortunately that heroic venture ended up with Harry getting medical attention for broken bones. Wouldn't you have liked to be a fly on the wall at the mall when Harry swung with all his might and couldn't knock the little guy down. I'd love to hear the little guy's side of that 'story'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
|
#34
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Are there any ghettos...
On 1/5/16 9:47 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 06:30:20 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/4/2016 8:28 PM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:58:21 -0500, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 4:52 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:30:17 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:16:00 -0500, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 15:57:37 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:29:02 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:19:40 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 12:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:09:22 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 9:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 9:10 AM, John H. wrote: I looked again, but could find nothing approaching 'racism' in the original question. Does Democrat control of ghettos automatically spell racism in some way? Perhaps some of the other experts on 'racism' could chime in. -- Blow that dog whistle, Herring. Local democratic politicians presiding over every known large ghetto area in America should not be construed to relate Democrats to racism. It's just a coincidence. Oh. I would think that fostering policies which keep the ghettos full *could* be considered racism, especially if the ghetto occupants are black. I suppose Krause considers use of the words ghetto and Democrat together is automatic 'racism'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Probably Krause associates black and ghetto together. Whether that's racist, I don't know. Ironic since "ghetto" is an Italian word derived from latin === Ghettos at varios times and various places have been associated with a lot of different ethnicities. One common definition goes like this: --- A section of a city, especially a thickly populated slum area, inhabited predominantly by members of an ethnic or other minority group, often as a result of social or economic restrictions, pressures, or hardships. --- The word seems to imply an economic distinction more than racial or ethnic. Since Democrats like to fancy themselves as champions of the downtrodden, it makes sense that they would identify with ghettos. Of course since the vast majority of working americans do not identify with ghettos it would seem to put democrats somewhere out in left field politically so to speak. Well, I'm guessing that the answer to my question is, "No". === Harry's opinions are just that. Which reminds me that opinions are like arse'ls, everybody has one. Harry never showed the balls to answer the question. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Once again, it has nothing to do with balls or anything other than my refusal to play your stupid trolling games. ...says the troll king and master of debt avoidance. :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! Speaking of Harry's balls. Did he ever tell you the story about the time he TRIED to beat up on a short scrawny guy because the little guy was allegedly harassing his wife or girlfriend? Unfortunately that heroic venture ended up with Harry getting medical attention for broken bones. Wouldn't you have liked to be a fly on the wall at the mall when Harry swung with all his might and couldn't knock the little guy down. I'd love to hear the little guy's side of that 'story'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! He assuredly would have beaten the crap out of you two ex-military pansies, and probably both at the same time. |
|
#35
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Are there any ghettos...
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:50:45 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/5/16 9:47 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 06:30:20 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/4/2016 8:28 PM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:58:21 -0500, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 4:52 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:30:17 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:16:00 -0500, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 15:57:37 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:29:02 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:19:40 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 12:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:09:22 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 9:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 9:10 AM, John H. wrote: I looked again, but could find nothing approaching 'racism' in the original question. Does Democrat control of ghettos automatically spell racism in some way? Perhaps some of the other experts on 'racism' could chime in. -- Blow that dog whistle, Herring. Local democratic politicians presiding over every known large ghetto area in America should not be construed to relate Democrats to racism. It's just a coincidence. Oh. I would think that fostering policies which keep the ghettos full *could* be considered racism, especially if the ghetto occupants are black. I suppose Krause considers use of the words ghetto and Democrat together is automatic 'racism'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Probably Krause associates black and ghetto together. Whether that's racist, I don't know. Ironic since "ghetto" is an Italian word derived from latin === Ghettos at varios times and various places have been associated with a lot of different ethnicities. One common definition goes like this: --- A section of a city, especially a thickly populated slum area, inhabited predominantly by members of an ethnic or other minority group, often as a result of social or economic restrictions, pressures, or hardships. --- The word seems to imply an economic distinction more than racial or ethnic. Since Democrats like to fancy themselves as champions of the downtrodden, it makes sense that they would identify with ghettos. Of course since the vast majority of working americans do not identify with ghettos it would seem to put democrats somewhere out in left field politically so to speak. Well, I'm guessing that the answer to my question is, "No". === Harry's opinions are just that. Which reminds me that opinions are like arse'ls, everybody has one. Harry never showed the balls to answer the question. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Once again, it has nothing to do with balls or anything other than my refusal to play your stupid trolling games. ...says the troll king and master of debt avoidance. :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! Speaking of Harry's balls. Did he ever tell you the story about the time he TRIED to beat up on a short scrawny guy because the little guy was allegedly harassing his wife or girlfriend? Unfortunately that heroic venture ended up with Harry getting medical attention for broken bones. Wouldn't you have liked to be a fly on the wall at the mall when Harry swung with all his might and couldn't knock the little guy down. I'd love to hear the little guy's side of that 'story'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! He assuredly would have beaten the crap out of you two ex-military pansies, and probably both at the same time. No doubt. You definitely displayed your manhood and courage in the telling of *that* story! -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
|
#36
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Are there any ghettos...
On 1/5/2016 9:50 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/5/16 9:47 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 06:30:20 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/4/2016 8:28 PM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:58:21 -0500, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 4:52 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:30:17 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:16:00 -0500, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 15:57:37 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:29:02 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:19:40 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 12:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:09:22 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 9:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 9:10 AM, John H. wrote: I looked again, but could find nothing approaching 'racism' in the original question. Does Democrat control of ghettos automatically spell racism in some way? Perhaps some of the other experts on 'racism' could chime in. -- Blow that dog whistle, Herring. Local democratic politicians presiding over every known large ghetto area in America should not be construed to relate Democrats to racism. It's just a coincidence. Oh. I would think that fostering policies which keep the ghettos full *could* be considered racism, especially if the ghetto occupants are black. I suppose Krause considers use of the words ghetto and Democrat together is automatic 'racism'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Probably Krause associates black and ghetto together. Whether that's racist, I don't know. Ironic since "ghetto" is an Italian word derived from latin === Ghettos at varios times and various places have been associated with a lot of different ethnicities. One common definition goes like this: --- A section of a city, especially a thickly populated slum area, inhabited predominantly by members of an ethnic or other minority group, often as a result of social or economic restrictions, pressures, or hardships. --- The word seems to imply an economic distinction more than racial or ethnic. Since Democrats like to fancy themselves as champions of the downtrodden, it makes sense that they would identify with ghettos. Of course since the vast majority of working americans do not identify with ghettos it would seem to put democrats somewhere out in left field politically so to speak. Well, I'm guessing that the answer to my question is, "No". === Harry's opinions are just that. Which reminds me that opinions are like arse'ls, everybody has one. Harry never showed the balls to answer the question. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Once again, it has nothing to do with balls or anything other than my refusal to play your stupid trolling games. ...says the troll king and master of debt avoidance. :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! Speaking of Harry's balls. Did he ever tell you the story about the time he TRIED to beat up on a short scrawny guy because the little guy was allegedly harassing his wife or girlfriend? Unfortunately that heroic venture ended up with Harry getting medical attention for broken bones. Wouldn't you have liked to be a fly on the wall at the mall when Harry swung with all his might and couldn't knock the little guy down. I'd love to hear the little guy's side of that 'story'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! He assuredly would have beaten the crap out of you two ex-military pansies, and probably both at the same time. You sure did pick on the wrong little guy, eh? |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Cruisers vs liveaboards and sailboat ghettos | Cruising | |||
![John H.[_5_] is offline](https://www.boatbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Linear Mode
