On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:37:51 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/17/16 7:14 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 18:56:39 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/17/16 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside of the two party system. And it's easily done too.


Oh, I gave you more credit than you'd get for wasting your vote. My
mistake.

Your vote is meaningless, what's your point?


Recruiting for the libertarians?

My vote for Clinton later this year will help ensure she gets out
state's EC votes and will add to her total vote nationwide. While
popular vote doesn't win the presidential election, a big landslide in
Clinton's favor has import.

So, stay home if you want, or vote for whichever Libertarian you like.

Do you really think anyone but the democrat will have a snowball's
chance in hell of carrying Maryland whether you or even 20,000 of you
stayed home?
Richard is in the same situation. I don't see any Reagans out there.

On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 6:18:28 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/17/2016 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside of the two party system. And it's easily done too.



Harry can't imagine voting outside of the Democratic party. You are
asking too much.

or grasping the concept of voting your conscience, instead of party mandates.

On 1/18/16 2:51 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 6:18:28 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/17/2016 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside of the two party system. And it's easily done too.



Harry can't imagine voting outside of the Democratic party. You are
asking too much.

or grasping the concept of voting your conscience, instead of party mandates.


No empathetic human could in good conscience vote for anyone in the
current crowd of Republican presidential candidates.

On 1/17/16 9:32 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:37:51 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/17/16 7:14 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 18:56:39 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/17/16 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside of the two party system. And it's easily done too.


Oh, I gave you more credit than you'd get for wasting your vote. My
mistake.

Your vote is meaningless, what's your point?


Recruiting for the libertarians?

My vote for Clinton later this year will help ensure she gets out
state's EC votes and will add to her total vote nationwide. While
popular vote doesn't win the presidential election, a big landslide in
Clinton's favor has import.

So, stay home if you want, or vote for whichever Libertarian you like.

Do you really think anyone but the democrat will have a snowball's
chance in hell of carrying Maryland whether you or even 20,000 of you
stayed home?
Richard is in the same situation. I don't see any Reagans out there.



Your disdain for the American political system is almost comical.
As for my vote, as I stated, I want to contribute to the Democratic
landslide in the popular vote. As for "Reagans," your boy Ronnie never
impressed me.

On 1/18/2016 8:34 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/17/16 9:32 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:37:51 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/17/16 7:14 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 18:56:39 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/17/16 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside
of the two party system. And it's easily done too.


Oh, I gave you more credit than you'd get for wasting your vote. My
mistake.

Your vote is meaningless, what's your point?


Recruiting for the libertarians?

My vote for Clinton later this year will help ensure she gets out
state's EC votes and will add to her total vote nationwide. While
popular vote doesn't win the presidential election, a big landslide in
Clinton's favor has import.

So, stay home if you want, or vote for whichever Libertarian you like.

Do you really think anyone but the democrat will have a snowball's
chance in hell of carrying Maryland whether you or even 20,000 of you
stayed home?
Richard is in the same situation. I don't see any Reagans out there.



Your disdain for the American political system is almost comical.
As for my vote, as I stated, I want to contribute to the Democratic
landslide in the popular vote. As for "Reagans," your boy Ronnie never
impressed me.

But Hillery does? What a joke. RR was the last great president we're
likely to see.

On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 7:31:40 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/18/16 2:51 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 6:18:28 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/17/2016 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside of the two party system. And it's easily done too.



Harry can't imagine voting outside of the Democratic party. You are
asking too much.

or grasping the concept of voting your conscience, instead of party mandates.


No empathetic human could in good conscience vote for anyone in the
current crowd of Republican presidential candidates.

Well the current pot of dems look like you have an old fashioned 'give-away-the-farm' socialist and a chronic liar.

decisions, decisions...

On 1/18/16 11:08 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 7:31:40 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/18/16 2:51 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 6:18:28 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/17/2016 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside of the two party system. And it's easily done too.



Harry can't imagine voting outside of the Democratic party. You are
asking too much.

or grasping the concept of voting your conscience, instead of party mandates.


No empathetic human could in good conscience vote for anyone in the
current crowd of Republican presidential candidates.

Well the current pot of dems look like you have an old fashioned 'give-away-the-farm' socialist and a chronic liar.

decisions, decisions...


There is no shortage of chronic liars running for the GOP nomination,
including the two at the top, and as for giving away the farm, what the
Repugs want to do is get their hands on more of the assets of the middle
class and working poor and hand it over to the rich.

On 1/18/2016 11:47 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/18/16 11:08 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 7:31:40 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/18/16 2:51 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 6:18:28 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/17/2016 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside
of the two party system. And it's easily done too.



Harry can't imagine voting outside of the Democratic party. You are
asking too much.

or grasping the concept of voting your conscience, instead of party
mandates.


No empathetic human could in good conscience vote for anyone in the
current crowd of Republican presidential candidates.

Well the current pot of dems look like you have an old fashioned
'give-away-the-farm' socialist and a chronic liar.

decisions, decisions...


There is no shortage of chronic liars running for the GOP nomination,
including the two at the top, and as for giving away the farm, what the
Repugs want to do is get their hands on more of the assets of the middle
class and working poor and hand it over to the rich.


It's so refreshing to hear something new from Krause. Snerk

On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 08:34:42 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/17/16 9:32 PM, wrote:


Do you really think anyone but the democrat will have a snowball's
chance in hell of carrying Maryland whether you or even 20,000 of you
stayed home?
Richard is in the same situation. I don't see any Reagans out there.



Your disdain for the American political system is almost comical.
As for my vote, as I stated, I want to contribute to the Democratic
landslide in the popular vote. As for "Reagans," your boy Ronnie never
impressed me.

As usual you either missed the point or you intentionally ignored it.
Reagan won Mass in 80 and 84. He won Maryland in 84 too.
Since then Md and Mass have been solid blue and a few more GOP votes
or a few less dem votes were not going to change that.

As for the political system, are you saying that you like the EC now
or are you just trolling again? The popular vote is actually
irrelevant. Once a candidate wins a state, the rest of the votes there
are pretty much wasted.

On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:47:17 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 1/18/16 11:08 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 7:31:40 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/18/16 2:51 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 6:18:28 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/17/2016 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside of the two party system. And it's easily done too.



Harry can't imagine voting outside of the Democratic party. You are
asking too much.

or grasping the concept of voting your conscience, instead of party mandates.


No empathetic human could in good conscience vote for anyone in the
current crowd of Republican presidential candidates.

Well the current pot of dems look like you have an old fashioned 'give-away-the-farm' socialist and a chronic liar.

decisions, decisions...


There is no shortage of chronic liars running for the GOP nomination,
including the two at the top, and as for giving away the farm, what the
Repugs want to do is get their hands on more of the assets of the middle
class and working poor and hand it over to the rich.


Are you implying that all Republicans are in the top 1%? Are there no middle class
Republicans? Perhaps Republicans would simply like to see more people earning their
living and paying taxes on their earnings.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!