How many from the Republican clown car will try to get in
on it, instead of mouthing inanities in a Fox debate.

Boating All Out wrote:
How many from the Republican clown car will try to get in
on it, instead of mouthing inanities in a Fox debate.



Now you are using Harryism's, Kevin? I thought you were a bit smarter
than that.

On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:19:26 -0500, Alex wrote:

Boating All Out wrote:
How many from the Republican clown car will try to get in
on it, instead of mouthing inanities in a Fox debate.



Now you are using Harryism's, Kevin? I thought you were a bit smarter
than that.

I suppose the real question is how bad ratings will be on Fox without
Trump. That is the only thing Rupert really cares about. I suppose the
core audience will be watching but they would watch a test pattern if
that was what was on.
I haven't really watched any of the debates so it doesn't affect me
either way. Is anyone actually going to say anything we have not heard
already?

On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 21:25:26 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:19:26 -0500, Alex wrote:

Boating All Out wrote:
How many from the Republican clown car will try to get in
on it, instead of mouthing inanities in a Fox debate.



Now you are using Harryism's, Kevin? I thought you were a bit smarter
than that.

I suppose the real question is how bad ratings will be on Fox without
Trump. That is the only thing Rupert really cares about. I suppose the
core audience will be watching but they would watch a test pattern if
that was what was on.
I haven't really watched any of the debates so it doesn't affect me
either way. Is anyone actually going to say anything we have not heard
already?

They might talk about Trump a bit more without the fear of getting stepped on
immediately.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

On 1/27/16 9:25 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:19:26 -0500, Alex wrote:

Boating All Out wrote:
How many from the Republican clown car will try to get in
on it, instead of mouthing inanities in a Fox debate.



Now you are using Harryism's, Kevin? I thought you were a bit smarter
than that.

I suppose the real question is how bad ratings will be on Fox without
Trump. That is the only thing Rupert really cares about. I suppose the
core audience will be watching but they would watch a test pattern if
that was what was on.
I haven't really watched any of the debates so it doesn't affect me
either way. Is anyone actually going to say anything we have not heard
already?


Early on, Kasich sounded as if he had an idea or two but that pretty
much stopped in the later "debates."I watched one more after that, but
now I just watch a few highlights or, in fact, lowlights. Very little
beyond name-calling and insults.

On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 06:43:52 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 1/27/16 9:25 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:19:26 -0500, Alex wrote:

Boating All Out wrote:
How many from the Republican clown car will try to get in
on it, instead of mouthing inanities in a Fox debate.



Now you are using Harryism's, Kevin? I thought you were a bit smarter
than that.

I suppose the real question is how bad ratings will be on Fox without
Trump. That is the only thing Rupert really cares about. I suppose the
core audience will be watching but they would watch a test pattern if
that was what was on.
I haven't really watched any of the debates so it doesn't affect me
either way. Is anyone actually going to say anything we have not heard
already?


Early on, Kasich sounded as if he had an idea or two but that pretty
much stopped in the later "debates."I watched one more after that, but
now I just watch a few highlights or, in fact, lowlights. Very little
beyond name-calling and insults.

We are very familiar with one who says very little beyond name-calling and insults.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

Jan 27Boating All Out
How many from the Republican clown car will try to get in
on it, instead of mouthing inanities in a Fox debate.
----

You mean there was a debate last night? Huh...

On 1/28/2016 5:39 AM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 21:25:26 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:19:26 -0500, Alex wrote:

Boating All Out wrote:
How many from the Republican clown car will try to get in
on it, instead of mouthing inanities in a Fox debate.



Now you are using Harryism's, Kevin? I thought you were a bit smarter
than that.

I suppose the real question is how bad ratings will be on Fox without
Trump. That is the only thing Rupert really cares about. I suppose the
core audience will be watching but they would watch a test pattern if
that was what was on.
I haven't really watched any of the debates so it doesn't affect me
either way. Is anyone actually going to say anything we have not heard
already?

They might talk about Trump a bit more without the fear of getting stepped on
immediately.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

Rest assured. He'll have a snappy critique ready the following day.

On 1/28/2016 7:02 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 06:43:52 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 1/27/16 9:25 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:19:26 -0500, Alex wrote:

Boating All Out wrote:
How many from the Republican clown car will try to get in
on it, instead of mouthing inanities in a Fox debate.



Now you are using Harryism's, Kevin? I thought you were a bit smarter
than that.

I suppose the real question is how bad ratings will be on Fox without
Trump. That is the only thing Rupert really cares about. I suppose the
core audience will be watching but they would watch a test pattern if
that was what was on.
I haven't really watched any of the debates so it doesn't affect me
either way. Is anyone actually going to say anything we have not heard
already?


Early on, Kasich sounded as if he had an idea or two but that pretty
much stopped in the later "debates."I watched one more after that, but
now I just watch a few highlights or, in fact, lowlights. Very little
beyond name-calling and insults.

We are very familiar with one who says very little beyond name-calling and insults.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

I wonder why he doesn't run for office in bumfoch MD.

On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:13:42 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

We are very familiar with one who says very little beyond name-calling and insults.
--



I wonder why he doesn't run for office in bumfoch MD.

===

If you think he's disagreeable on the internet, imagine what he must
be like in person. :-)